a little harsh.
But to your point/question. The way I look at it, the big difference between now and then (Vietnam for example) is that today there is no viable commercial outlet for still photos of...well, almost anything. It is simply not feasible to freelance as a war photogrpaher. Contrast this to the situation in the 1960's and 1970's...we had print magazines like Life, and Look, and 100's news papers that paid! real money for photos and employed real photojournalists. Where is that today? How can anybody make a living doing freelance photojournalism to day? To my mind, the answer to your question is all about economics. Making money by talking about gear on YouTube is real. Lots of folks are doing it. Where's the money in photojournalism today?
Shot on digital, just to be clear since this is a film website)
Yes we will see. Thanks for your comments.At this time we would be discussing more about opportunists playing into their own future hoping to snap something that will have give them Pulitzer.
For me time will have come after this war is over to look at what was recorded and evaluate then.
In other words I don't think this is the right time to put anything of this nature up for a discussion.
Yes we will see. Thanks for your comments.
the US-based companies are useless.
...Up to here it went trough, but wait and see.!It's difficult to say what I mean with out editorializing. Hopefully, this passes the "no politics" test.
There may be many rookie photojournalists covering the current conflict that we are not aware of and whose work we do not see here in North America because, "it's not our war".
My question: Are there enough outlets to encourage photojournalism? Life, Look, Time and Newsweek?
Thanks for your comments. Do you know the names of any who have died? Would like to appreciate their work.Photojournalists are losing their lives in Ukraine. So I would never denigrate what they are doing. Also keep in mind that the Ukrainian government is limiting their access to help Ukraine propagandize their point of view. So it must be difficult for anyone including those writing stories from there to get the real scoop.
It would help if we actually had some journalism based magazine outlets with real editors and writers to frame and publish this sort of work.
And, no, this is not a partisan political jab; "Angertainment" has overtaken real journalism, period.
So where would the serious photojournalist publish?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?