As good as this looks processed, I have doubts that it is from 1968 or earlier.
No, by 'as good as this looks processed' I mean that I shot and processed some today to find out what mystery film awaited me in the bulk loader with unknown storage conditions prior to me receiving it probably 10 years ago. It sure doesn't look like 50 year old film shot at "box speed" and no special treatment.Was processing before 1968 worse?
Did Ilford make FP4 (not plus) without the modern edge markings? As good as this looks processed, I have doubts that it is from 1968 or earlier.
I got an old bulk loader with some leftover FP4 (not plus) last year. The edge markings were just regular, no special coding.
Similar to what's in the image above?
I hadn't noticed this. You're right - the perfs are different from the Neopan.Ilford also made cine films. This was my first thought, until I read Ian's comment.
But now I see it got B&H perforations.
Ilford Movie film, (I have a roll of Pan-f I got somewhere)
1) "ilford Safty film" will read right from the emusion side
2) BH perforations
3) the many digit number will be one digit different on your next roll. that is the "footage Number" that would be used in editing. They would print a work print with the numbers printed through, edit the work print and then use those numbers to cut the camera negative to match. the number should also read right from the emulsion side.
the "B" probably indicates the film type But I don't have my old data sheets handy, (I have the compact Photo lab index on my computer, but I does not have the type codes.)
in those days you had the choice of Pan-f, FP4 or MarkV
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?