idea with lith film

Microbus

H
Microbus

  • 2
  • 1
  • 951
Release the Bats

A
Release the Bats

  • 10
  • 0
  • 941
Sonatas XII-47 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-47 (Life)

  • 1
  • 1
  • 1K
Kildare

A
Kildare

  • 8
  • 0
  • 2K
Sonatas XII-46 (Life)

A
Sonatas XII-46 (Life)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3K

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,667
Messages
2,795,089
Members
99,995
Latest member
mackaydavid
Recent bookmarks
0

reub2000

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
660
Location
Evanston, IL
Format
35mm
I was thinking about using some lith film as a kind of mask for printing. What I want to do with it is put it in my easel and then expose it. It would then be completely black where the shadows are. Then I would use the sheet of lith film to burn the paper. This would then allow me to maintain local contrast across the paper and still getting both highlight and shadow detail. Would this work?
 

vet173

Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2005
Messages
1,209
Location
Seattle
Format
8x10 Format
Or you could take the mask, and make a positive to sandwich with the neg.
 

Mike Wilde

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
2,903
Location
Misissauaga
Format
Multi Format
read the articles

There are ways to sandwich discussed under an unsharp masking article started by donald miller, if I recall correctly.
 
OP
OP

reub2000

Member
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
660
Location
Evanston, IL
Format
35mm
I was thinking of using lith film so it would form a solid block where it blocks light, so it wouldn't really affect local contrast. I was thinking that it would be easier to put my mask on the easel over the paper, because this would be easier to properly align with 35mm film.

Also, (there was a url link here which no longer exists) is the article.
 

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,230
Format
Large Format
I was thinking of using lith film so it would form a solid block where it blocks light, so it wouldn't really affect local contrast. I was thinking that it would be easier to put my mask on the easel over the paper, because this would be easier to properly align with 35mm film.

Also, (there was a url link here which no longer exists) is the article.

Yes, you can do what you are thinking about doing. For dodging or for burning you may find that it is helpful to make an unsharp mask to blend the demarcations on the print (the unsharp mask would be used after your burn and dodge mask). The Photowarehouse APH material is available in sizes up to 20X24 inches the last time I checked.

The reason that we normally sandwich with the camera negative is the cost of the masking material is less expensive that way. But 35 mm is very difficult to register properly.

You might consider making a fold over fiber foard frame to hold your mask ...that way you can fold it in or out of the projected image as needed.

Another thing that can be accomplished by doing this is to have two different filter grades for your shadows and highlights...So you do not need to expose the entire print at a grade two ...you could print your highlights at grade 1 1/2 (as an example) and your shadows at grade 3 1/2 (as an example).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom