• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

I want A Hasselblad. Talk Me Out Of It!

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,937
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format

Why did I sell my Bronicas?
 

Vaidotas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Feb 9, 2019
Messages
96
Location
Vilnius
Format
Multi Format
My humble few cents after 25 years with V501 …
In that particular order …

Pro’s
Resale value. Selling is easy even now.
I sold three times when I was short in funds and rebought again in more sunny days. Huge market for lens & accesories.
It fits in your palm. Perfectly. Kind of transition of your body. Try it with Rollei66.
Format. What others claim as nonsense, square is magic. Supposedly engineered for convenience - just crop vertical or horizontal for glossy journal pages. Composing sqare is Zen. Tricky but highly regarding.
Reliability. Good specimen won’t fail you.
I was confident as hell in every assignment .
Compatibility. Fully usable optics on digital - FF or MF.
Zeiss optics. No comments required.
Central shutter. All the goodness with flash.
Travelling. Good companion even with 1 lens of your choice.

Con’s
Age. Repair might be costly.
I do not recall which celebrity photog said that it is hard task to make a tack sharp image with hassy. It takes some practice. Almost all shots I made are with tripod.
Bokeh. Five aperture leafs, it’s up to your taste, background might be fuzzy wide open.
Format. Hey, it’s tiny 56x56mm!
Lens sharpness. It started bothering me after these years as I longing for high resolution in lower contrast. Mamiya Press is my fave now.
And last one - it’s emotionally hard to sell. My precious.
 
Last edited:

nikos79

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Mar 9, 2025
Messages
1,052
Location
Lausanne
Format
35mm
To reply above: Something about square formatting:
It is not magic, it is at first very counterintuitive to compose in square. The biggest problem is that the strict square format already imposes you a very strict geometry, so you already have "solved" the form or composition problem "easily". Now to make it work beyond the obvious form and make the photo interesting I find it very hard. But worth trying it saves your from horizontal or vertical dilemma
 

Don_ih

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,544
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Yes, with a Hasselblad, you can crop it rectagular



or leave it square

 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,914
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
BrianShaw said:
A kind gesture but you already know 2 things shout him: he’ll tell you to buy a Hasselblad (and a bunch of lenses) and he’d chime in on this topic whether invited or not.
Click to expand...

Sirius is a well-respected contributor and very knowledgable about everything Hasselblad! We are fortunate to have him here as a member.
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
4,007
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I think the ball is in Andy's court now. I have my Hasselblads and am well satisfied. One thing for sure is that if I never took another decent photograph it wouldn't be from the lack of the proper tools.
Sometimes I think we photo nuts have more of a lust problem when it comes to photo equipment. Yes, I'm guilty myself since I will always lust for a Rollei SL66E and a flock of lenses. Heck, I'd settle for a SL66, but then I'd still be lusting for a SL66E. Where does it all stop? I hear my wife's voice echoing in my ears, "You need another camera like you need a hole in your head".
 

Nokton48

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
3,096
Format
Multi Format
Also look at availability of accessories. Plenty of Blad stuff available.
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
4,007
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
Andrew O'Neill said:
@John Wiegerink I was just looking at the Rollei SL66 and they are pretty expensive!
Click to expand...
Andy, I was just lusting and will probably never own a SL66 or SL66E. Unless I win the lottery, which won't happen since I spend my money on film and not lottery tickets. Besides, if either one came in the postal mail I would surely end up with a hole in my head and my wife's hand wrapped around a smoking gun. I've been told many times that the only difference between men and boys is the price of their toys. I used to snicker at that saying, but I do think there is a lot of truth there. I think we all, men and women, try to justify purchases that aren't a necessity. The problem for me always comes down to separating my "wants from my needs". If I ruled out all the purchases I have made based on "wants" I would have missed out on a lot of enjoyment. Of course, I would have had a few less regrets also. Clint Eastwood said, "A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do" and Andy, you have to do what you have to do. Good luck
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
4,007
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
Andrew O'Neill said:
@chuckroast is your 100mm f/3.5 Planar a T lens?
Click to expand...
When it comes to "T" lenses I haven't found the none "T" lenses lacking in much of any way. That said, if you are a wide-angle type guy then go for the best coatings you can get. I have an early SWC with the 38mm non-"T" and it's one flaring son-of-a-gun when the sun or bright light gets anywhere near it. The glass on the 38mm is perfect so it's not from internal haze or scratched coatings. I have two 80mm Planar lenses, one "T" and one single coated and have no problems with either one.
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,522
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
Depends on what your main subject matter is. For me, square is the worst possible format, panoramic is the best.
 

BrianShaw

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,973
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
nikos79 said:
You took this photo? Is really good! And with a very difficult subject that is emotionally charged
Click to expand...

It really is a nice photo, but it gives me the creeps. The last time I was in a graveyard with my Hasselblad I slipped on some ice and fell flat on my back and head. After regaining conciousness I was pleased that the Hassy landed right in the middle of my chest/stomach. And since I was the only one in the graveyard at the time I was also happy to have actually regained conciousness before freezing to death.
 
OP
OP

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
12,870
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
@John Wiegerink Good to know about T and non-T lenses. Thanks! Bye the way, I've cut back a bit on doughnuts, and put the savings towards film!
@Arthurwg thanks! Good to know!
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,937
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format

Sounds like a "Swedish" safety feature, like a Volvo, the camera tucks itself in to protect itself in a collision

I recommend "Yaktraks" for your shoes. Maybe get a X-ray, we can't afford to lose you!
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,937
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I would start with a newish outfit. I need to use a grip, same with my RZ67II. My oafish hands require something to hold on to. Kangol beret optional

 

Pieter12

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 20, 2017
Messages
8,164
Location
Magrathean's computer
Format
Super8
The downside for me is the WLF. I just find it awkward hand-held. Of course, that goes for any WLF: on a Bronica, Mamiya, Kiev, Rolleiflex, etc. Adding a prism finder improves things, but adds a lot of weight. The Hasselblad prism seems bulky and unbalanced to me, others are better. But still heavy.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,062
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register