thuggins
Member
While shooting fall foliage in Pennsylvania with one of my Olympus Chrome Sixes, a number of the frames came out "fogged" (for lack of a better term). I posted some on the images in the color film forum in a post titled "It Wasn't Foggy" and the responses there convinced me that the problem wasn't with the film or processing. That leaves me to conclude that the problem is somewhere in the camera.
After examining both the negatives and the trannies, it looks for all the world like a second exposure directly overlaid on the first. Having taking my fair share of double exposures I've gotten used to the look of them. Even trying to be scrupulously careful, I still managed one double exposure out of the six rolls on this trip. Since most of these "fogged" frames are uniform across the image the only way I can think of extra light getting in is thru the shutter.
I have dry fired a number of times and the shutter seems fine. This camera was also serviced by a top notch shop and the "good" shots come out perfectly exposed even at the top shutter speed (1/200s). Has anyone ever heard of a Copal shutter causing a problem like this?
After examining both the negatives and the trannies, it looks for all the world like a second exposure directly overlaid on the first. Having taking my fair share of double exposures I've gotten used to the look of them. Even trying to be scrupulously careful, I still managed one double exposure out of the six rolls on this trip. Since most of these "fogged" frames are uniform across the image the only way I can think of extra light getting in is thru the shutter.
I have dry fired a number of times and the shutter seems fine. This camera was also serviced by a top notch shop and the "good" shots come out perfectly exposed even at the top shutter speed (1/200s). Has anyone ever heard of a Copal shutter causing a problem like this?