Looks like tungsten correction by the lab to me. Did you use the modeling light on the flash instead of the flash? Assuming you were using flash? Or you had a blue correction filter to correct for tungsten but used flash instead and the lab scanned it as you gave it to them? Could be a couple of things obviously.
Like Matt said, can't really tell where the problem lies unless we see the neg....
How do the negatives look - share a photo of them, backlit against a white light source.
If I was dealing with a lab that uploaded scans like this before mailing the negatives, I would contact them immediately and ask if they could pull them from the shipping room and check the scans.
Darryl, I've used TheFindLab in the past and they were great. Not the cheapest, though, so I started developing my own.Can you recommend a lab to process my film?
Yes - but Vancouver, BC Canada probably doesn't work for you.
That being said, I've worked in and with lots of labs over a very long time. I've yet to encounter one that doesn't make a mistake at least once in a while.
The best (pro) labs I have ever used or worked in checked everything visually and manually. I doubt that is economic for most now.
HATE when that happensI use http://photogenic.com/item/82/201/pl2500dr-1000-ws-with-digital-display/ and I just test-fired it with the 250w modeling light on full blast and it doesn't go off. I thought they were supposed to when the flash fired. Argh!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?