You should hear me go on about "retro" crap.
If you're a professional photographer, would you use a Lomography camera?
What's wrong with a little retro? I mean, almost all of my cameras are "vintage." Even my Diana. I guess there is a small difference. They aren't new things made to look like old things, they're just old things. They're "authentic." This weekend I will probably make waffles in my c. 1950 Sunbeam W-2 waffle maker and serve them on c. 1960 Royal China Blue Heaven plates set on our formica 'n chrome kitchen table.
What's wrong with a little retro? I mean, almost all of my cameras are "vintage." Even my Diana. I guess there is a small difference. They aren't new things made to look like old things, they're just old things. They're "authentic." This weekend I will probably make waffles in my c. 1950 Sunbeam W-2 waffle maker and serve them on c. 1960 Royal China Blue Heaven plates set on our formica 'n chrome kitchen table.
I believe John Canlas uses a Holga at weddings with x-processed slide film.
Without lomography and their enthusiastic shooters army, the color processing labs in my city wouldn't make it until this day. Even a Kodak professional lab is saved from this lomography hype, the lab is almost shut down when the digital frenzy was happening and affected film-processing lab in the whole country.
I really don't give a shit about their overpriced lo-fi cameras and overpraised point-and-shoot style. Honestly the only thing I care is we both shoot film, for the love of the old tradition.
Sure yeah, I should say this: dear lomographers, thanks for everything.
but does that mean that we and they (the buyers) should accept that the products are overpriced?
If you think something... anything... is overpriced, then simply don't buy it. Let the market take its course.
Like I said before, I can think of all kinds of photographic items that are overpriced. Not just these "low end" items. So what. I am not compelled by ego, nor by fashion, nor by colleagues to buy anything that I don't want.
Anyway, if it is so clear-cut that the prices are offscale, then why isn't a competitor emerging....?! If you really know that the price for any product is too high according to yoru own calculations, and you know that the demand is there and is solid, then just go into business and take your profit.
would that it were so easy...
besides, there are equivalents that do the same thing and do it for far less, but they - unlike these - aren't marketable in clothing stores. surely being desired doesn't up it's quality or value?
The stores we're talking about are typically next door to starbucks, for crying out loud...!
[...]
buy up a bunch of old cameras on ebay, clean 'em up, paint them pink and bedazzle them and sell them with a roll of film and a blingy chain.
it's the same piece of poorly moulded plastic
I think you mean individually molded plastic. Think about it, the defect has become the effect. Why? Well it's the antithesis of pixel perfection. I still don't see why some insist that the product value is merely the "rational" material value. That has never been true in any business!!! Not even if you're selling gold straight out of the ground.
But anwyay... I say go with it if you want. If not well then the same price will buy you a week's worth of vente moccha crappucinos...
but don't you think it should be rational material value, that we should be better consumers, that we should expect more for our ever harder to earn cash?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?