- Joined
- Aug 14, 2004
- Messages
- 4,031
- Format
- Multi Format
Kerik said:Of course not. If you actually read my post, it says that (in MY opinion) it's futile to try and control what is discussed in a public forum and it just pisses people off, which seems to be a sport for you. As much as it is your right to state your opinion, it is other people's right to discuss whatever the hell they want for as long as they want to! Have you noticed that these "hey, would you guys stop talking about this topic" threads never end amicably and generate needless ill-will?!?!? Or perhaps that is their purpose.
Sorry Dave. Don't see it that way. Personal feelings of guilt about something other people say are one's own problem to deal with. And it seems to me that the organisers of the event are the ones to gauge when they have "plenty of answers ... provided". Especially when the organisers put in the hours they have done for the purposes of wanted nothing more than to say Film is Alive & Well and having a party.Satinsnow said:I am getting tired of the posts trying to make people feel guilty because they could not afford, had schedualing conflicts or have family to consider before photography, I think plenty of answers have been provided over the last week, that should allow anyone that wishes to organaize and event of this nature, I am sure 2007 will be bigger and better, but I really don't think much is being accomplished anymore, there were those who attended and had a great time, there were those who wanted to attend and wished they could of, then there are those who didn't attend and don't have any desire to attend.
Would it be possible to leave it at that and not continue to drive this subject into the ground?
Dave
Satinsnow said:I agree Jennette,
I am logging off for the evening.
Dave
Satinsnow said:Sorry Chris,
I woke up and completed the other project I was working on...
I just don't think it is fair to make people say in a public forum, they didn't have the money...we can all make excuses, but this was expensive for most people, and again, I have nothing but admiration for those who organized this event, for a first time event I would say it was a great success...
I am not against, I am not lobbying for a certain location, but I would like to see the information gathering handled a different way...
I would like to see more pictures and hear more trip reports, I couldn't attend and though others I might be able to get a feel for what actually went on, yes the social side is important, but I would like to hear about the nuts and bolts of the event.
For those who think I am an enemy, or you have made an enemy because my opinion is different, you could not be father from the truth, this was an opinion, plain and simple, it could be valid and it might not be valid, I am for Traditional photography 100% plain and simple and will always question things we do, that can be done better to further our passion.
Dave
mrcallow said:Andy I have some good stories to tell, but I'm fearful of retribution.
mrcallow said:I also believe that those bitching about our attempts to make the conference better are either deluded or have another agenda.
mrcallow said:Dave get over it and put this forum on ignore.
Dave,Satinsnow said:John,
Why would I do that? I started this thread, your taking it personal, I am sorry to offended you so much..
Dave
mrcallow said:Dave put this forum on ignore.
You've stated your opinion Dave. Loudly. In the APUG Conference thread where everyone goes to read about .... da na na naaaaaa ... the conference.Satinsnow said:John,
Why would I do that? I started this thread, your taking it personal, I am sorry to offended you so much..
Dave
Satinsnow said:...there is no other agenda either, there is the belief that film photography can and will prevail in its present... blah, blah, blah
billschwab said:Forgive me everyone...
Dave,
What a bunch of passive aggressive crap. No you're playing nice, standing up for others and being a champion of film? What next?
You speak of opinions? I stated an opinion... that you might not want to read the conference thread if it upset you so. In fact, reading back I was pretty nice about it, I never once implied an order to "NOT" read a thread. Several others have since done so as well. What did that get me??? I need no innuendo, you made your thoughts very clear. "What am I going to do...?" you asked when you continued your aggressive PMs to me after I have asked you not to? I'll say that I haven't had to deal with a childish display like that since I was on the playground in grade school. Your PMs didn't only annoy me, they frightened me and put a bad taste in my mouth for this place knowing bullies like you still exist in adulthood. The fact you are continually allowed to do this surprises me, but I suppose being a sponsor has its perks.
Let me just say this... It does my heart good that someone of your character thinks I am a jerk. I'll take that as a compliment.
Good riddance to you,
Bill
Can't quit the bully bit, eh? These days the whacko behind the screen on the Internet isn't just the whacko on the Net any longer, but I guess you might not watch the news up there. Yes, it frightens me. It frightens me to have someone not heed my request to stop harassing. This is what you did no matter how you try to paint it. Be it on the screen or in person. For now, thankfully, it is on the screen. I hope I never have the displeasure of the latter.Satinsnow said:...there is nothing typed on a computer screen that frightens me, so you must be pretty fraile...pretty typical stuff Bill...
billschwab said:Can't quit the bully bit, eh? These days the whacko behind the screen on the Internet isn't just the whacko on the Net any longer, but I guess you might not watch the news up there. Yes, it frightens me. It frightens me to have someone not heed my request to stop harassing. This is what you did no matter how you try to paint it. Be it on the screen or in person. For now, thankfully, it is on the screen. I hope I never have the displeasure of the latter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?