ALL photo dev solutions.
Correct. No HQ in there. XTOL is a Dimezone-Ascorbate developer. Rodinal, D23, Perceptol and other formulas don't contain HQ either. Even D76 can be altered slightly and made to work the same without HQ (Haist version). Print developers are another matter. HQ in pretty much everything.
There has been either a big jump in price or a decrease in availability of many photographic chemicals in the last year. HQ is just one of them. Much of the US supply came from Texas Eastman which is probably scaling way back.
PE
..Im getting the quake in Japan - but there are other big manufactures in China. Given there are other uses other than 'photo' [maybe bigger], I cant see a 250% jump as justified. If we though we have seen sticker-shock, just wait till this hits the pike. ..just me: I use 100lbs a year. dw
Michael
could you post the formula for D76 without HQ?
You cannot just substitute ascorbic acid for hydroquinone. As has been stated many times on APUG the resemblence between these two chemicals is only superficial. Xtol is probably the closest ascorbic acid analog for for D-76 after all the correct adjustments to the formula have been made. Search on APUG for the formula which has been posted on more than one occasion.
There is also the Haist modification to D-76 which eliminates the hydroquinone and increases the metol content slightly. It is referred to as D-76H and is used just like D-76. Note that the name uses a captal H since there is another completely different version of D-76 referred to as D-76h.
D-76H
water (125°F) 750ml
metol 2.5g
sodium sulfite (anhydrous) 100g
borax (decahydrate) 2.0g
water to make 1 liter
The version above is used as a one shot either FS or 1+1.
There is a thread on this here on APUB about 2 months ago.
PE
I was not suggesting replacing HQ with ascorbic acid in any formula. I've stated many times on here I do not believe in simple substitution formulas. Once something is changed, the entire formula needs to be looked at and possibly rebalanced, or scrapped.
Bob - the formula Gerald posted for the Haist version of D76 (D-76H) is correct. The formula is the same as D-76 except the HQ is eliminated and the Metol is increased to 2.5g. Image characteristics are said to be virtually identical. As for its capacity compared to regular D-76, I cannot say.
I read somewhere that DK-76b is an official Kodak formula without hydroquinone, but I could be mistaken.could you post the formula for D76 without HQ?
APUB? PE, have you been drinking or got drinking on your mind?
Drinking? Not that early. Just an error while touch typing, one that I missed.
PE
I was with EK for 32 years. And, yes I hate to see them go down, especially the way it is taking place. It is now about 8 PM, and I have not had a drop!
Well, to coffee and fruit juice count?
PE
You cannot just substitute ascorbic acid for hydroquinone. .
Many deviations from this original d76formula have been proposed over the years. A recent suggestion, by Haist is to justomit hydroquinone and raise metol tohope this helps 2.5 g, creating D-76H, an environmentally friendly and more stable developer,sometimes called d76H.a simple but effective alterationby someonewho probably knows best.
here on APUB
This place is sort of like a pub.
Mostly friendly and jovial, lots of discussion, some disagreements, some arguments, some risque' humor, some dirty jokes, some clean jokes, some witticisms; a few who think they're funnier than they are, a few who think they're smarter than they are, some who are all talk, a know-it-all or two, an obnoxious jerk or two, a few who arrive clearly drunk; a couple of professorial types, some really smart non-professorial types, some young ones to whom it's all new, some who sit off in a corner and watch the goings on with amusement, lots of just regular folks; and through it all, the overworked, underpaid help, who try to keep a semblance of order, and the overworked, underpaid owner, who just wants to keep the fun flowing, but ends up spending most of his time keeping up the building.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?