Last night I received information the Environment Canada is looking at the regulation of Hydroquinone as a toxic substance. They are asking for input from "Industry and other interested stakeholders". There is a complete outline of the concerns and proposals in the fallowing links.
http://www.ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/challenge/batch1/batch1_123-31-9_rmscopes.cfm
http://www.ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/challenge/batch1/batch1_123-31-9.cfm
Michael
Noticed this comment at one of the links:
"Canadians may also be exposed to hydroquinone through handling photo developer chemicals for processing black-and-white film. Since the increased popularity of digital photography is rapidly replacing film photography, this type of exposure would be expected to continually decrease over time."
HQ does seem to have some toxicity but reading the links they confirm that the route of entry to the human body for photographic use is via the skin. Conclusion: don't put your fingers in developer, or wear gloves.
If you plan on handling the dry powder you are probably going to breath in significant amounts unless you are using a facility with more advanced ventilation/extraction than is normally used for a darkroom.
I think you ought to have specified that that is 12g per liter of stock solution, so that the final concentration in the user solution is 3 to 6g per liter.... B&W Print developer is more common form in which one might contact HQ. A typical print developer stock solution contains about 12g of HQ, and it is typically diluted at a rate of 1:1 to 1:3 with water. The prints are typically moved from tray to tray by using tongs. When multiple prints are stuck together in a tray, tongs may not have the grip to separate them, and an un-gloved pair of fingers may be needed to separate the sheets. ...
???Good Ol' Canada: start worrying when the problem is vanishing...
Hmmm, so...I guess I should really buy a set of print tongs then? Is it really so dangerous to move prints with bare fingers? Am I jeopardizing my health?
Hmmm, so...I guess I should really buy a set of print tongs then? Is it really so dangerous to move prints with bare fingers? Am I jeopardizing my health?
Why is Canada worrying about HQ now instead of having worried about it twenty years ago when everything pictorial was run on silver photography? It seems to me like yet another instance of our slow-to-the-party-but-well-intentioned-anyway attitude.
(4) Where the Ministers propose to take the measure referred to in paragraph (2)(c) in respect of a substance and the Ministers are satisfied that
(a) the substance is persistent and bioaccumulative in accordance with the regulations,
(b) the presence of the substance in the environment results primarily from human activity, and
(c) the substance is not a naturally occurring radionuclide or a naturally occurring inorganic substance,
the Ministers shall propose the implementation of virtual elimination under subsection 65(3) of the substance.
i.e. don't panic.
it's an off-the-shelf drug taken in darker-skinned cultures - consumed, apparently, in massive quantities - with no ill effects... about the same as vitamin-C, it would seem. if that. I liked the response that this old bavarian guy who ran a photo shop in my home town in canada (who sold me my first linhof, when I was 22) had to say on the issue; "what's the big deal...? it's only soda water...!" (we were talking about fixer)
According to the MSDS, a relatively small dose (29g/Kg) of Hydroquinoe taken orally has caused death in at least one human.
That's not a small dose. I'd need to eat about 3 kg (6 1/2 pounds) of hydroquinone to equal that dose. I can't eat a steak that big.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?