Hi, thanks for sharing this.
You are doing a lot of post processing after the already processed output of NLP.
I don't use NLP (I don't use or need Adobe Lightroom) but I thought you pay for NLP (and pay dearly) for it to give you a usable, and sometimes bang-on inversion out of the box and spare you the need for further lengthy processing?
If post-processing is something you enjoy or master (I don't) why not simply manually invert using the curves (e.g. Koraks' method), and then tweak as above?
With the midtone layer in the adjustment field, click exactly on the previously set measurement point.
Long story short, you can photograph a color checker (this could be something like an IT8 target), run it through the entire process (i.e. develop the film, scan it and then do e.g. a linear inversion) and then use the digital output to construct an ICC profile. So basically you would treat much of the processing as a black box and profile it in an end-to-end kind of way. A digital camera could be profiled in the same way. A free software suite to do this with is ArgyllCMS, which doesn't excel in user-friendliness, but it's really powerful. And free.
That's a rather crude summary of the topic,
What do you mean specifically?
I might type out the long story at some point but not now.
If you search the Forum you may find some posts of mine where I discuss these.
You could; it'll boil down to a manual approach with visual color matching. With ArgyllCMS you should be able to automate this, although no guarantees of a really functional ICC profile.
I have reason to be critical of the contents of that pdf. I just don't have the time or inclination to explain in depth now. The gist of it is that the conditions which the author of the odd considers as dealbreakers need not be in practice. It depends on the use case. And there's also the chance of experiencing utility of even an imperfect profile; it's a bit like shooting a digicam on fixed daylight white balance.Then please be so kind as not to disparage other people's work without reason. That doesn't help anyone.
Until that happens, we as users still have to adjust the controls
For profiling digital cameras, I use the Colorchecker Passport 2 (still from Xrite). Maybe I can use it for color film, too, and tinker a bit.
I thought the whole point was that the colors were open to interpretation to begin with?
I previously tried photographing Colorchecker Passport on film, scanning, saving as DNG, and running the result through the camera profile creator software, but this resulted in an error message.
Fortunately, I've gotten pretty good at color negative reversal using Silverfast AI Studio, then making final adjustments using the RGB curves controls in Lightroom, enough so that I felt I was getting results comparable to that using Negative Lab Pro.
There is an ongoing debate among photographers whether digital photography processes will ever be able to reach the pinnacle of image quality and tonality achieved by Ansel Adams decades ago. The Digital Zone System (DZS) is an innovative methodology for editing digital images that mimics the Zone System created by Adams.
Thank you, that saves me a disappointment
I'm not saying that it can't be done, only that it didn't work for me, and I don't know why.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?