How would you go about duplicating Kodak No.1 Camera's asthetics using equipment commonly available today?

Hamster

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
207
Format
Med. Format Pan
If you are in for a little experimentation, help me check this configuration, as I do not have my 2x3 and 4x5 Graflex on hand at least for a few weeks, so I can't verify if any of this would work.

I wanted to make some of those circular prints from Kodak No.1/2 cameras from the early days of photography.

The circular prints are 2.5" for the Kodak No.1 (1888) and 3.5" (1889) for the Kodak No.2

From what I gather, the Kodak No.1 uses an Achromatic Meniscus with Focal length about 57 mm with fixed f11 aperture.

I know using only the rear group of a Tessar type approximate an Achromatic Meniscus and can form an image, but I cannot remember if it extends or reduce the effective focal length or what size image circle it would project. I am also not sure how much of the projected image circle is usable.

Maybe the rear group of an 135mm Optar/Raptar would be a good starting point to test? I only have 135mm Optar and 6-3/8" Ilex Paragon.

So if I use a circular mask on film plain and directive positive paper in the 2x3 or 4x5 film holder, I should be able to approximate the aesthetics of Kodak No1/2 prints?

How would you do it with the equipment you have on hand?

I have attached an image to illustrate what I'm getting at, photo credits Daily Mail UK.
 

Attachments

  • article-2439904-186D3E3100000578-781_636x382.jpg
    227.7 KB · Views: 19

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
1,197
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Honestly I’d probably just put a circular mask on a 6x6 back for RB67 and call it good.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…