How was 8x10 SS Kodak tank used?

The Gap

H
The Gap

  • 4
  • 2
  • 47
Ithaki Steps

H
Ithaki Steps

  • 2
  • 0
  • 71
Pitt River Bridge

D
Pitt River Bridge

  • 5
  • 0
  • 78

Forum statistics

Threads
199,003
Messages
2,784,452
Members
99,765
Latest member
NicB
Recent bookmarks
1
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
I bought on eBay years ago, for 'someday', a deep stainless steel tank, Kodak 8x10 IIRC.

I then read they are chemistry hogs & got more interested in trays & a Unicolor drum.

What kind of support mechanism was used with such tanks? Kind of tall & thin & easy to knock over...probably a trigger-happy bid on my part I guess. :rolleyes:
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,974
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Depends on how wide it is. Most that I've seen are freestanding, but I've seen some that are designed to sit in a water jacket.
 

richard ide

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
1,217
Location
Wellington C
Format
Multi Format
Mine are 1 gallon tanks (about 2.5" thick in the other dimension). Very economical with chemistry if you replenish the developer. I can develop 24 4 x 5 negatives at a time or 6 8 x 10. Would not be without them.
 

CBG

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
889
Format
Multi Format
Another vote for the 1 gallon 6x10 tanks.

C
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
They're considerably harder to knock over when fully loaded with chemistry. 1 gallon weighs what, 8 lbs? And if you think a 1 gallon tank is tough, try one of the Kodak hard rubber 8x10 tanks - they hold 3.5 gallons. The stainless one was most likely intended to be used in a "production line" in a water jacket, with replenishment.
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2007
Messages
907
Location
Nanaimo, Bri
Format
35mm
I received a bunch of the 3.5 gallon tanks from a fellow APUGger. Considering 4x5 is the largest I currently shoot they're only worth bringing out when I've got a LOT of film to process!
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
Both the 1 gallon and 3.5 gallon tanks were designed to fit into a water jacket or SS sink. In fact, there were special sinks designed for these tanks.

The 1 gallon tanks used SS 8x10 holders, but the 3.5 gallon tanks held either holders or saran baskets that held up to 24 sheets of film or paper. If you used holders, there was a top insert for either tank that spaced the holders apart to avoid scratching.

Kodak and other companies made nitrogen spargers for both types of tank for agitation with nitrogen burst.

PE
 
OP
OP
Murray@uptowngallery
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
Thank you. I was imagining a water jacket around it.

Lifting a 3.5 gallon one to empty it (oh, duh, that's why you need a sink) would not be fun for people with no running water/drainage in their DR.
 

jp80874

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2004
Messages
3,488
Location
Bath, OH 442
Format
ULarge Format
I use the one gallon ss tanks as a distilled water dip before hanging sheets to dry. This is after developing five sheets of 8x10 in a Jobo Expert tank.

John Powers
 
OP
OP
Murray@uptowngallery
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
1,041
Location
Holland, MI
Format
Pinhole
I looked in the box to see how big it was, and to my surprise, it had 4 8x10 hangers in it, so maybe it's not quite the useless orphan I initially thought ("I was thinking what good is 1 tank?")
 
Joined
Nov 16, 2003
Messages
624
I looked in the box to see how big it was, and to my surprise, it had 4 8x10 hangers in it, so maybe it's not quite the useless orphan I initially thought ("I was thinking what good is 1 tank?")

Gaseous burst agitation, the former industry standard for film development for nearly 40 years. When you take your transparency sheet film for E6 to a lab there is a 90% chance that they are using gaseous burst to develop it. With JOBO on the ropes there is no more repeatable and precise way to develop film around. There is only one moving part (the gas solenoid valve). I personally like the tanks with the wider rim.

Reference - View Camera magazine May June 2007.

Cheers!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom