@iakustov Something doesn't add up with your numbers. Normally, Pyrocat HD part B is 750g potassium carbonate in a total volume of 1l. You can use sodium carbonate instead, but an equimolar amount should be used, in order to get the same alkalinity. Potassium carbonate has a molecular weight of 138,2, while sodium carbonate has 106. This means that instead of 750g of potassium carbonate, 575g of the sodium salt should be used, assuming the anhydrous form. You seem to be using much more alkali in your working solution than normal. Of course, this can be a deliberate choice and give you exactly what you wish, but is certainly not the 1+1+100 dilution that I suspect you aimed for.
@iakustov I really don't understand how they got to these figures. If you were using the regular potassium carbonate solution, then you'd use 0,75g of potassium carbonate per 100ml of developer working solution. You are now using 1g of sodium carbonate instead of 0,575g. There's also no hydrate of sodium carbonate that would make the 1+5+100 dilution correct. As it is, 1+3+100 would be fairly close.
Hi again,
So, I finally got around to mix up Pyrocat-M. A question for dilution and time/temp though (film is TMax 400 if relevant)... Im reading a 1+1+100 dilution is good for silver prints while a 2+2+100 is good for alt. processes. But Im also reading that Pyrocat is the better developer for making dual-purpose negatives... The way I understand this is that you can use the same neg for both silver printing and say carbon printing (https://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/PCat/PCat3/pcat3.html). Or am I missing something? To make these negatives is it referring to the 1+1+100 dilution or the 2+2+100 dilution? Or some other dilution?
Also, any ideas about film capacity? Is, say, 500ml of working solution sufficient for rolls of 120?
Cheers
Peter
.........
Also, any ideas about film capacity? Is, say, 500ml of working solution sufficient for rolls of 120?
Cheers
Peter
Thanks. I did look around but its still slightly unclear too me... It appears to me that if one develop with 1+1+100 the neg can be used for silverprint an pt/pd... or UV light copying - like carbon prints. Also, as far as I can understand from the different posts negs intended for VC paper needs 25 % longer development time then times given (without being sure what times it is referred to)? I might have misunderstood something though.
Also, when developing with Pyrocat... does the process deviate in any other way? When developing BW negs in Jobo I would pre-wet, develop, plain water stop bath, fix, and then stab. Is this the same for Pyro?
Please tell me that you wash between fix and "stab".
The issue with VC paper and stained negatives was more of a problem with PMK where the image stain could be somewhat greenish rather than brown (mine were not noticeably green but I've seen images in which the PMK negs were quite green). Green acted as to modify the light source when exposing VC paper and so reduced contrast. However the stain from Pyrocat is more brown and the effect is a lot less, so I don't think you need to worry about it. To the extent that it still works, it results in a neg that's effectively a bit less contrasty with VC paper than graded paper (and hence some alternative processes if they are sensitive only to blue/violet). The negs can then be called "dual purpose."
The sodium sulfite bath isn't necessary, but won't harm and will help wash film quicker, that's all. It's not Pyrocat specific at all. You can also use a stop bath if you wish, although half strength might be a good idea.
Hi again,
So, I finally got around to mix up Pyrocat-M. A question for dilution and time/temp though (film is TMax 400 if relevant)... Im reading a 1+1+100 dilution is good for silver prints while a 2+2+100 is good for alt. processes. But Im also reading that Pyrocat is the better developer for making dual-purpose negatives... The way I understand this is that you can use the same neg for both silver printing and say carbon printing (https://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/PCat/PCat3/pcat3.html). Or am I missing something? To make these negatives is it referring to the 1+1+100 dilution or the 2+2+100 dilution? Or some other dilution?
Also, any ideas about film capacity? Is, say, 500ml of working solution sufficient for rolls of 120?
Cheers
Peter
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?