I've seen some conflicting advice on how to uprate guide numbers. Like the GN at 1m @ ISO 100 is 36.
The advice online is scant for some reason, but two conflicting methods come up.
Say I want the GN for 1600.
One says to just multiply by the number of stops. Like: four stops from 100 to 1600. So 36x4 = 144
The other says to multiply by 1.4 for each stop: So 36x1.4 = 50.4x1.4 = 70.56x1.4 = 98,78x1.4 = 138,29 @ 1600
Pretty close though. The last one seems to agree with the short table on the back of a packet of bulbs.
But one of them gotta be right though.
Which one?
For bounced flash it doesn't matter a whole heck of a lot of course, a lot is up to slack and experience. But it's still nice to be able to be precise.
One says to just multiply by the number of stops. Like: four stops from 100 to 1600. So 36x4 = 144
The other says to multiply by 1.44 for each stop: So 36x1.44 = 50.4x1.4 = 70.56x1.4 = 98,78x1.4 = 138,29 @ 1600
Helge I generated Guide Number curves in an Excel spreadsheet to do exactly what you want, based off data on the back of various flashbulbs. If you can use Excel I’ll upload the file
NewI've seen some conflicting advice on how to uprate guide numbers. Like the GN at 1m @ ISO 100 is 36.
The advice online is scant for some reason, but two conflicting methods come up.
Say I want the GN for 1600.
One says to just multiply by the number of stops. Like: four stops from 100 to 1600. So 36x4 = 144
The other says to multiply by 1.4 for each stop: So 36x1.4 = 50.4x1.4 = 70.56x1.4 = 98,78x1.4 = 138,29 @ 1600
Pretty close though. The last one seems to agree with the short table on the back of a packet of bulbs.
But one of them gotta be right though.
Which one?
...if you do not care about exposure accuracy, 'about the same' does not work when you stack the multiplier (just as the OP did). f/16 vs f/14.75... resulting in overexposure, is that 'close enough' for shooting transparencies?...not for many folks.