How popular were earl Exacta SLR's?
-
A
- Thread starter chip j
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
Want to Buy Omega D5500 with Dichroic Head, Australia
- Started by andrewherrick
-
For Sale Two Graflex 6x9 film backs for Graflex RB 6x9 (2x3)
- Started by Alex Varas
-
For Sale Nokton 40mm f/.14 SC for Leica M cameras.
- Started by Alex Varas
-
Under Offer Nikon F2AS + Nikkon 50mm f/1.8 Ai - CLA'd in July 2025.
- Started by Alex Varas
Forum statistics
Exact unfortunately was largely fading in prominence in the 1960s, and the brand went out of existence in the 1970's...and approaching 50 years since prominence it almost qualifies as an 'antique' by common measures.
The Exakta Varex was the first universal use scientific camera. Just look at the accessories made for it.
Not quite... The trademark went in a legal case to West-Germany were it indeed faded. But about ten years later it was revived and a new west-german Exakta entity manufactured the Exakta 66. Based on Pentacon Six bodies imported from Pentacon in Dresden... to make the loop close.
Last edited:
Exacta's are very practical camera, the Zeiss lenses were excellent but focus lubrication was poor. I wish I'd bought a Varex 1000 and not a Zenit E when I was still at school. I now us a Varex IIb witha Pancolar or Tessar amd 30mm Lydith lens.
Ian
Ian
In the early 1970's, when I became interested in SLR's for the first time, I thought the Exaktas were very old fashioned - I wanted an instant return mirror and clever viewfinder displays.
About 15 years ago, their lack of complexity combined with their flexibility appealed to me. I now have three VX's, a VXIIa, and an Exa 500. I use them all the time. I use the delays and the long speeds. I use a wide variety of lenses from 28mm to 200mm. The 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Jena lenses are outstanding. I was probably the only person in the world to photograph the Aug. 21 total eclipse with an Exakta!
A few of mine:
Between July and October of this year, the only cameras I used were my Exaktas.
About 15 years ago, their lack of complexity combined with their flexibility appealed to me. I now have three VX's, a VXIIa, and an Exa 500. I use them all the time. I use the delays and the long speeds. I use a wide variety of lenses from 28mm to 200mm. The 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Jena lenses are outstanding. I was probably the only person in the world to photograph the Aug. 21 total eclipse with an Exakta!
A few of mine:
Between July and October of this year, the only cameras I used were my Exaktas.
In 1969 when I was looking for my first SLR a Varex 1000 with Pentaprism and f1.8 Pancolar was £75, an Exa with Domiplan was £22 but not a very good option, the Zenit E was £39 and had a meter.
The real reason Exakta's faded from prominence was the RTL100 etc based on a Praktica they'd lost their uniqueness.
My Varex IIb:
Ian
The real reason Exakta's faded from prominence was the RTL100 etc based on a Praktica they'd lost their uniqueness.
My Varex IIb:
Ian
One other thing I should mention: on my Exaktas at least, the shutter speeds - including the delays and long speeds out to 12sec - are still within tolerances. I'd bet they've never had a CLA and they're over 60 years old.
The only issue I have, and I bought it that way, is the shutter capping at 1/1000 on the VXIIa.
It's just amazing to look at roll after roll of perfect negatives coming out of these cameras.
The only issue I have, and I bought it that way, is the shutter capping at 1/1000 on the VXIIa.
It's just amazing to look at roll after roll of perfect negatives coming out of these cameras.
Yes instead of a cheap pair of binoculars which would have given him a far better view for his voyeurism than looking through an Exacta with a telephoto lens. Other than the Exacta, there were not very many SLRs around in the days when that film was shot. Besides Alfred Hitchcock might have been more interested in effect than accuracy......Regards!.
In their time they were known as rugged cameras that could be used anywhere and any conditions.
No. It was a Kilfitt Fern-Kilar f/5.6 400mm.
I had a Varex IIa, marked "made in soviet zone". I traded it for a Leica IIIg with Summarit, as new.
Don't forget that that the Exakta's and Exa's had a shutter release on the left hand side. Very few cameras did and this made them popular with lefties.
Advance lever on the left, too. I'm left eye dominant, but right handed, so I use shotguns left handed, as well as most cameras. I found the Varex very confusing, but now I want another one.
The Exacta is a left handed camera who could anyone not feel love for that! 
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2005
- Messages
- 6,826
- Format
- Multi Format
Hmm. The Exakta had an an unparalleled system and was approximately the top 35 mm SLR until the Nikon F was introduced. What killed Exakta wasn't that catastrophe the RTL1000, it was the Nikon system and, more generally, modern SLRs, primarily from Japan. East Germany couldn't complete.
EBay shows quite a few completed sales of body and lens for under $100 that seem functional - however, I think a CLA is long overdue on any of them.
Staying with Nikon makes sense, even though they don't have an internal film cutting knife.
Given that Exaktas were make in Dresden, Germany, which was a Soviet bloc controlled (East German) area after WWII, the brand suffered from the same relative 'backwardness' in design as just about all Soviet photographic products, and probably the same resistance to market success afforded to all the Soviet bloc products.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |