It strikes me as odd that you would want to shoot film instead of digital because you don't take a lot of photographs. Surely there is a reason other than quantity that you would want to shoot film. I "snap off" photographs at about the same rate with film and digital.Over the past couple years I've taken a little over a thousand digital photos. Most of them are pretty worthless, you know, stuff you might send over instant messaging and such. Out of all those photos, I'd say about thirty or forty would be worth printing. So because of this, I decided film would be a great for me. Cheap to get into, and as long as I'm more deliberate with my shooting, the cost will remain pretty low. So with that, I ask, how often do you film shooters actually snap off a photograph?
It strikes me as odd that you would want to shoot film instead of digital because you don't take a lot of photographs. Surely there is a reason other than quantity that you would want to shoot film. I "snap off" photographs at about the same rate with film and digital.
Not daily - sometimes more sometimes less ...
In 2018 I shot about 50 rolls of 120 and approxemately 15 of 35mm.
Since you already have a digital camera, anything you spend on film cameras, not to mention film, processing, and scanning if you want to post online, is an extra cost not a savings, so if it's cost savings your after, I don't see it. As far as digital prints being punched up in Photoshop, well that's entirely up to you. You can punch your images up or not. And digital prints can last as long as chromogenic prints. In fact, some prints from digital files are chromogenic prints. If you want to shoot film, there are plenty of good reasons for doing so. I don't think your reasons add up so far. What's the real reason?Well, my initial interest in film was the low entry cost. I got those three cameras there in a partial cash partial trade deal for $200 and an old laptop. They're all in pretty darn good condition, too. I'm really starting to appreciate the look of film as well. With a lot of digital photos, you look at it and think, wow that's stunning, but then you realize how punched it up it's been in Photoshop and that wow factor just melts away for me. I've also never ever felt the desire to print digital photos. I don't know why. Clearly it's a psychological thing, but I really want some physical photos that I can look at in five or ten years and actual share those memories with people around a table or something. Did you not like me using the phrase Snapping off a photograph?
That's a lot. Do you have your own darkroom?
Since you already have a digital camera, anything you spend on film cameras, not to mention film, processing, and scanning if you want to post online, is an extra cost not a savings, so if it's cost savings your after, I don't see it. As far as digital prints being punched up in Photoshop, well that's entirely up to you. You can punch your images up or not. And digital prints can last as long as chromogenic prints. In fact, some prints from digital files are chromogenic prints. If you want to shoot film, there are plenty of good reasons for doing so. I don't think your reasons add up so far. What's the real reason?
I shoot film when I want to print gelatin silver prints, or tone my prints, or lith print. I shoot digital when I want to make digital negatives for platinum/palladium prints or other alternate processes. Occasionally, I make digital color prints.After getting film developed and scanned, it kind of behooves you to pay a little extra for some prints. As I already said, I've never had any inclination to print photos taken with digital. What's odd is I've never even considered it. Once I see the images on the monitor I just have no impetus do so. It's not logical, but that's how I feel about it. I could go on and give you a bunch of reasons, though many of them might not be logical. Film just feels better. But I'm a hobbyist. I'm certainly not making a case for film being better that digital. From a utilitarian perspective I think digital is definitely better. It's easier and the equipment yields better, more predictable results. My reasons for shooting film don't have to be yours. I assume you shoot film, though, so I'd love to hear your reasoning behind it.
...
Of course that really isn't even the MOST important question. That question is this; how many prints will my loving wife allow me to hang on her walls?
...
It has been my experience over the years that someone ALWAYS has ownership of the walls.It's always problematic when the wife has ownership of the walls.
Which leads to yet another important question: Are you having a good time? In 25+ years of shooting there are only a handful of my photographs that I think are really good. There are lots that I like, but that's different. Really good? Not so many. What's important to me is that I really enjoy the process. I'm having a good time (as are you). I seriously doubt any museums will be ringing my phone off the hook either.However, I am having a great time blowing my children's inheritance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?