138S as long as you enjoy the debate then please continue to put forward what seems to me to be good points but please recognise that they will make no difference to most if not all of the U.S/N American Kodak users who decide to contribute posts here. I have yet to see any recognition that there may be even one U.S. Kodak user who begins to appreciate anything you have said.
As I said in another thread on Australian prices I do wonder where the U.S./N American viewpoint would be if it was Europe that was the biggest film market and it was we in Europe who enjoyed the price margin over the U.S. /N America.
Many film users make a great effort to use film and also they are enthusiats, but it they feel extorted then for sure many will drop, and this is a risk that may challenge color film survavility.
However for colour there are a more nuanced set of considerations -
Prices of old were based upon a certain "scale of economies" that don't exist anymore and won't exist again.
I don't agree, scale is more important than ever.
The highest cost of film is having a plant idle, so economy of scale it's important to overcome fixed costs. You have to pay the technicians that know how to make Ektachrome, if you produce twice that cost is half per roll...
The marginal cost of producing a roll is very low, main cost is having all the plant operative and paying salaries that are not related to manufacturing personel.
It can be attractive for the short term to push prices, in special if urgent cash is needed, but long term customer base reduction makes film more expensive to manufacture because fixed costs are distributed to less rolls, commanding a higher price which shrinks market and again increases fixed cost per roll. If you produce a single roll in one year it will cost millions of dollars.
I don't belive that kodak cannot produce produce more, the installations they have can produce insane amounts of film, that's a tale for kids, IMO.
What we may have is an EK vs KA race to see who charges more on the product.
Anyone who doesn't think that there is a distribution problem obviously hasn't lived in a different country just 47 blocks from the USA.
If I purchase stuff from a volume retailer in the US and have it shipped to a US address, it is remarkably cheap - in many cases much cheaper than my local retailer can buy it from a Canadian wholesale distributor.
In both cases though - the US distributor selling to the US retailer and the Canadian distributor selling to the Canadian retailer, they pay the same price to Kodak Alaris, outside of shipping and import costs.
Well that would be true if Kodak were idling their production lines, but supposedly they are running the existing lines at full capacity with 3 shifts a day and still are unable to keep up with demand.
You apparently missed the fact that Kodak demolished a significant portion of their production capacity (45 buildings around 5 years ago) and no longer have the capacity they once had.
https://petapixel.com/2015/07/19/kodak-turns-92-year-old-film-manufacturing-building-into-rubble/
The kids will have to be told another story...
Prepare the calculator.
(snip)
They are free to fix the price they want, but they should tell more refined lies.
Yeah... right
See here 0:12min....
This is the relatively "low capacity" manufacturing line that ilford has. Two 120 rolls per second.
Now power on the calculator. 3600x24*2 = 172,000 rolls per day, this is 63,072,000 rolls per year, spare a 20% time for service if you want. 50 Million rolls capacity of the 120 size only in a single line. Problem is that they can't sell that amount. Kodak/Fuji machinery is faster.
Dear '138S',
with all respect, but as someone who has been working in this industry for quite a long time in several areas, and as someone who has been inside of so far five different film manufacturing factories in several countries, I have to tell you that you
- have no knowledge at all how film manufacturing is really working, neits arguments here is completely wrong.
Latest example ist that:
I've been in the Ilford factory. I've seen the film converting running there, both 135 and 120.
Your numbers here are totally wrong!!
Because: You are only pointing at the 'boxing speed' of 120 film (putting the converted film into the card box). But that is completely irrelevant for the total possible capacity of 120 film converting!
The decisive factor for 120 film converting is the machine in which the film is assembled to the spool and the backing paper. And that process is very complex and needs time! It is very slow compared to the speed needed for putting the film into the card box.
About 6-8 seconds for one 120 film is needed in the 120 film converting machine! Therefore Ilford's real max. 120 film converting capacity is only a tiny fraction of what you have said in your posting.
That are the facts.
Eastman Kodak's problem is that definitely their 35mm film converting (and probably also their 120 film converting) is already running in 3 shifts per day at max. capacity. But that is not enough to satisfy demand. Demand is much higher. Therefore complete new converting lines have to be installed. I have seen such lines: That is absolutely high tech and a very complex technology. It needs much time and capital to build up such lines. And new staff has to be hired and educated to run these lines.
It is not possible to raise this capital from the so far (before the price increase) low margin film products. All film manufacturers have had so far this low margin problem. Therefore Fujifilm has increased prices in spring 2019 significantly (they have similar converting capacity problems), Ilford have had increases lately, too.
You should definitely have a look at the presentation of the ADOX CEO concerning the low margin problem in the industry here:
Best regards,
Henning
Henning, if you have been inside a factory... Haven't you noticed that they have spoolers working in parallel?
With all respect, there are enough spoolers to feed the boxing machine !!!
If not the line would not be balanced. In series production machinery capabilities are balanced to not generate stocks in the middle.
With all respect, go back to visit a factory and take a look.
Anyway an spooler is paid with the film it processes in two days, so if lacking spoolers...
We have talked about Ilford here: And no, there are no spoolers for the same format working in parallel at Ilford!!
Ilford has one 135 converting line in operation.
And they have also one 120 line in operation.
That are the facts.
When I toured the factory in 2007 they had a single 135 and a single 120 line. The talk then from our group was whether '220' film could be produced again but I think this was considered uneconomical due to the need to commission a new machine and forecast sales.
Possibly Henning could chime in on that.
Can you point me to the thread Henning, and update it with shareable information if appropriate?Matt, we already had discussed that topic in a different thread. I have given all information I am allowed to give. But I cannot give more details because of a NDA.
Best regards,
Henning
Can you point me to the thread Henning, and update it with shareable information if appropriate?
We have talked about Ilford here: And no, there are no spoolers for the same format working in parallel at Ilford!!
Ilford has one 135 converting line in operation.
And they have also one 120 line in operation.
That are the facts.
Due to reliable sources who have visited the EK factory in Rochester about two years ago - before the recent huge demand increase for 135 colour film started - at that time two 135 lines had been in operation.
And as I know from my market analysis of the global film market and Kodak's market share running two lines at full capacity 3 shifts per day is now not enough at all to satisfy the strongly increasing demand. New converting machinery is needed.
you have never been in any film factory at all.
Again wrong: Film production is not series production, it is batch production.
To get a ROI needs a long time.
So, you are convinced to know all about film production much better than the experts who are working in this industry for so long.
If film production is so easy and profitable as you think, then you should find investors and start film production as soon as possible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?