How Many Cameras do you Own?

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
...
Nikon F4 ----> Canon T90
...

I respectfully disagree. The Nikon F4 is a professional grade camera with all functions accessible using individually dedicated controls (i.e. knobs, levers, switches are used in a single, simple, direct manner).

The T90 is a deformed, fossilized pear. A deformed, fossilized pear with advertising scribbled on the front of it. A deformed, fossilized pear, with advertising scribbled on the front of it, that I would never allow into my house.

How many cameras do I have? Well, from 1971 to 1986 I had just one camera and one lens (Pentax with 55/2). During those 15 years I used it extensively. To this day I feel very comfortable using it (which was just a few months ago).

After 1986, well, the number of cameras seems to have increased exponentially. However, I've slowed down recently and now focus on all-mechanical small cameras. For example, I'm currently using a Retina IIa.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format

Wow, so much hate for the T90. First time i ever, ever, read any person disparaging the T90. But to each its own. I also find the T90 ugly, much preferring the Canons that came before the "T" era. But internally the T90 is great stuff.

You are correct in pointing out that the F4 is a professional grade camera, the T90 is not. And i love the cameras that have all functions accessible using dedicated controls (as in the F4).

If the Nikon F4 wasn't so big, i would own one... However, for me once 35mm cameras get too big, i'd rather use any of my medium format cameras.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
Interesting that you did not include the F100. We all know that Canon has nothing equal to nor better than the Nikon F100.

Well, i was limiting myself to manual focus cameras (except for the F4 which still works just fine for manual focus, and its AF isn't so advanced either).

If you mean "equal" to the F100 in the sense that the F100 is a companion to the flagship pro camera (F5), in a bit less of ruggedness but most of the same (good) features, even more features in some respects, in a easier to use, smaller package that also cost less, and also "equal" in the sense of being a battery-powered autofocus camera...


... then what about the Canon EOS 3 then? There are things the EOS 3 does, that the F100 cannot do.

Not that i care, really; i don't care too much for AF, 1/8000 shutter speed or fancy flash metering modes.
 

keenmaster486

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2016
Messages
626
Location
Atroxus
Format
Medium Format
Oooh... Let me see if I can name them all from memory.

35mm
Kodak Retina IIa (my day-to-day rangefinder)
Regula Cita
A Pentax SLR which model I forget because I haven't used it in many years

Medium Format
Kodak Brownie No. 2
Kodak Brownie No. 2A
Folding Pocket Kodak No. 2
Voigtlander Bessa I (my day-to-day 120 job)
Kodak Duaflex II
Kodak Tourist II
Kodak Cartridge Hawkeye No. 2
Kodak Brownie No. 0

Instant
Polaroid Land 100

All in all, I'm pretty satisfied with this collection. The only thing I might feel obligated to add to it someday is a truly outstanding medium format camera. Otherwise, the Retina and Bessa have served me as well as I need them to.

On the other hand, my sister owns a Zeiss Ikon SLR which I am jealous of
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,649
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
I currently own about 12 workable 35mm and other format cameras.
 

paul ron

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2004
Messages
2,706
Location
NYC
Format
Medium Format
hundreds... i restored n collected for 45 years.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Interesting that you did not include the F100. We all know that Canon has nothing equal to nor better than the Nikon F100.


Hey man, like I was jerkin' you around. We all know that there are people who will never forgive Canon for changing the lens mount and diameter. There are people who will never forgive Nikon for removing the tab from the top of the lens. And there are people who will never forgive Nikon and Canon for switching to autofocusing lenses. Damn it, real photographers use wet plates and who does George Eastman think he is with his "You push the button and we do the rest."?
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
Hey man, like I was jerkin' you around.

LOL...
Don't worry, when I read your post "Interesting that you did not include the F100. We all know that Canon has nothing equal to nor better than the Nikon F100" i had a great laugh, immediately.


And gunpower flash!
I agree.

and who does George Eastman think he is with his "You push the button and we do the rest."?

He's a smartphone-photography, instagram/tweeting terrorist! Down with him!
 

rthollenbeck

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
210
Location
Near St. Lou
Format
Large Format
Interesting, I don't even know how many I have.


The F4 is great.
Don't have a T90 but I remember thinking it was worth consideration. There are/were so many consumer grade SLRs that I wondered how long it would be till they found their final resting place at the land fill. I wouldn't lump the T90 in with those. No reason to slap anyones Mama just for mensioning the T90'in my opinion.
 
Last edited:

etn

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,113
Location
Munich, Germany
Format
Medium Format
Far too many more than I need, always one or two short of the number I want.
Ha ha that is a nice way of presenting it

Mine are very complementary and all in use. From large to small:
Hasselblad with many lenses
Rolleiflex (with 1 lens, errr, actually 2 )
Nikon F90x (N90s for you Americans) with many lenses
Zeiss Ikon (last model)

And the most "analog" of all you-know-what-cameras, a Nikon Df.

Oh, I almost forgot an €8 Retinette 1B.

My next "wants", funds permitting, are an Xpan and a Nikon whose backs are not getting sticky with time, F100 or F6 perhaps.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,970
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
I don't hate the T90 - I just wouldn't own one.

I have owned a T90 for more than 25 years and although it has always worked faultlessly I can't say I love it I much prefer my Canon F1's, the main reason I have kept it is for it's TTL flash ability to use for fill in flash when shooting outdoor portraits.
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
I have negative feelings about the AE-1, but also about the nikon 2020 and 401/4004.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I have negative feelings about the AE-1, but also about the nikon 2020 and 401/4004.

At least the N2020 is a cute camera. Very cute.

What is your negatives about the AE-1? I consider it a great camera. Mechanically, a remarkably (for a consumer camera) smooth shutter and mirror action. A precise meter. A reliable AE system. A good viewfinder. Smooth shutter button. Easy operation.

Only "cons" is that it has a plastic top and bottom, and that it depends fully on the 4LR44 battery. But on the other hand on the AE-1 i had, the battery lasted A LOT.

The other "con" is stop-down operation, not so ergonomic, and that manual mode is very simplistic.
 

frank

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2002
Messages
4,359
Location
Canada
Format
Multi Format
For me, the AE-1 represents a tipping point between the era of classic cameras and the consumer plastic cameras that followed. Just an irrational personal bias, I know.
 

HiHoSilver

Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
2,170
Format
Multi Format
I have too many. I need to learn how to use one. They are fun & interesting, but I get too easily distracted from the reason I want to have one.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
For me, the AE-1 represents a tipping point between the era of classic cameras and the consumer plastic cameras that followed. Just an irrational personal bias, I know.

You are correct, it is THE tipping point, at least for a change in camera construction, to internal modularness, more plastic, and microprocessors.
 

Wallendo

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
1,409
Location
North Carolina
Format
35mm
I have too many, but try to shoot with each of them occasionally.
I own about 25, but a few don't work and I keep them as decorations. I bought 5 or 6 of them because they came attached to lenses I wanted and the set was cheaper than just buying the lens) I sometimes feel guilty about not using some of the cameras and will shoot a roll with each cameras periodically. It's not uncommon when I travel to take one camera loaded with B&W and another loaded with E6.
 

rthollenbeck

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2013
Messages
210
Location
Near St. Lou
Format
Large Format
For me, the AE-1 represents a tipping point between the era of classic cameras and the consumer plastic cameras that followed. Just an irrational personal bias, I know.

I don't disagree, but there is no reason to have hard feeling about the ushering in of the junk era. These consumer cameras did much more good than bad in my opinion.
Makers still ground out plenty of high grade cameras for those willing to pay for them.
Consumer junk made SLRs much more available and most at an adequate quality level (although they were not built to last through the ages).
No doubt lots of this junk led to advancements, like programs, matrix metering, and probably auto-focus. Most of this stuff wasnt desired by pros/or at least incorporated in pro models/ at its beginnings).

Speaking for myself, a few of these designs were pretty well done. I owned several Minolta XG-7. I liked that camera, it held up, I'd even happily use one again.
Just my 2 cents, that's not to say I'm not even more pleased with what I own now.
 

benjiboy

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
11,970
Location
U.K.
Format
35mm
You can't knock the cameras of the A and T series they were made with new materials, electronics and automated machining and assembly techniques that were a real money spinner for their company and it beat their major competitors in that section of the camera market hollow, and they put some pretty advanced photo technology in the hands of the consumer at a reasonable cost. In the 25 plus years since they were produced have proved to be pretty reliable because there are millions of them still about in good working order.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Back in the 1990's, when APS was introduced, I remember silently thanking all the millions of people who bought point-and-shoot cameras because their usage of film helped drive and fund further film development.

As for plastic cameras, most of my life I bought and used the professional Nikons (F to F4), Leica M's, and Hasselblads. Yet one weekend I became enamoured with a camera that I'd often reviled: a Canon Rebel (a 'G' aka 500N). I found it fun and easy to use, I enjoyed its features and modes, and the photos with its inexpensive 50/1.8 were really very good. From this life lesson, I've learned not to despise any camera.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Somewhere around 100 to 150 ranging from Minox, Minolta 16, 35 mm RF and SLR, 120 TLR, 120 and 620 box.
 

nsurit

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Messages
1,808
Location
Texas Hill Country
Format
Multi Format
This is something my wife and I agree on . . . too many! Not that it matters, but somewhere around 100.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…