• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

How long can I keep my developer.

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,602
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
At the time, I have a generic two reel processing tank. It holds just shy of a liter of chemical. It's the one 120 or two 35mm reel kind.

I have been using the 5 liter jugs and mixing XTOL, and recently DDX (1:4).

The thing is, I'm not familiar enough with shelf life, or replenishing, enough to know what I'm doing. So to be safe, when I develop a roll, I discard the developer instead of putting it back into the jug. I got sloppy with the XTOL and would put it back into the jugs for a few times and took my chances, but I don't want to do that with my project film.

Since I'm trying to shoot more, and I'm developing regularly, I have learned that this is going to get quite expensive fairly quickly. I just bought the $17 bottle of DDX a week or two ago, and after only three rolls, it's time for another.

What can I do to reduce the cost, in terms if making this last longer?
 

Dave in Kansas

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jan 8, 2009
Messages
302
Location
Eastern Kans
Format
Multi Format
Xtol works well replenished and if you do a search you will find detailed instructions about how to do it. It's quite easy.

Kodak documentation states that Xtol will keep for 6 months. Some people have reported keeping the stock solution longer than that, but it does not change color with age and from I understand, when it quits, it quits. If you use constant replenishment you can keep the process going for years by adding fresh developer with every roll developed. It becomes very cheap if you do that.

DD-X does get rather expensive mixing it 1:4 as the instructions suggest and using it one time. A single batch mixed 1:4 can be used for multiple rolls, but Ilford states the quality may not be quite as good or something like that. Some people use DD-X at higher dilutions e.g. 1:7 or 1:9 one-shot and that helps to reduce the price per roll. I recently picked up a bottle of DD-X to try when my current batch of Xtol reaches the 6 month time at the end of this month.

Dave
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Using X-Tol in a replenishment regime would be by far the best approach.

With DDX, the Ilford Technical data sheet says:

AVAILABILITY AND CAPACITY
ILFOTEC DD-X is available in 1 litre bottles world- wide. Used at 1+4 for one shot processing it will develop 16 135/36 films. If reuse techniques are used it will develop up to 50 135/36 or 120 films.

Note the reference to 1 + 4, rather than the more confusing 1:4.

The technical data ("Fact") sheet that covers all the Ilford liquid film developers is accessed from the product page for DDX - here is the link: http://www.ilfordphoto.com/Webfiles/2011427124733149.pdf

The description of "reuse" process in the Ilford fact sheet indicates that involves some decrease in quality. It certainly involves a large increase in complexity (developing time is constantly changing).

The replenishment regime for XTol result in a subtle increase in quality, and is incredibly simple.

Your choice.
 

kbrede

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
285
Location
Nebraska
Format
Multi Format
If your tank takes just less than 1L, maybe it would be beneficial to look for a smaller tank. My Patterson tank (one 120, two 35mm size) takes 500ml of developer. A stainless tank would be even smaller.
 

tkamiya

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Oct 3, 2009
Messages
4,284
Location
Central Flor
Format
Multi Format
I used to use XTOL. It lasted me 8 months at minimum. I basically keep my developers in "per serving" bottles to minimize exposure to air. My bottles are plastic. It could have lasted longer but I ran out at that point.

I do not replenish but use it one-shot.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,369
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Xtol used at 1+1 and then discard is still quite cheap but I'd certainly look for smaller tanks. My Jobo will do 2x120 or 2x35 in 485mls. If you have a Jobo rotary processor then it is 140 and 240 mls respectively for 35 and 120 film. Store it in winebags

pentaxuser
 

John Wiegerink

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
4,105
Location
Lake Station, MI
Format
Multi Format
I went through four bottles of DD-X and to this day think it to be one of the best developers out there, but cheap it is not. I switched to using it more diluted than 1+4 as recommended and actually liked it just as well or maybe a little better. In the end I switched to replenished Xtol and now I'm looking into "Home-made Xtol" and then I'll use that as a one-shot. Of course, for now I'm using and really liking Pyrocat-HD. If you want "cheaper, but better" then look no further than Pyrocat-HD and you can buy that pre-packaged also or mix your own. You have a part "A" and a part "B" when mixed with water 1:1:100 or 1 oz. A + 1 oz. B + 100oz. H2O. A little goes a long, long way and it last nearly forever. Sounds like you might want to try it. JohnW
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,602
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
I don't want to use XTOL at all though. I don't want to use any Kodak chems or film - strictly Ilford.

I'll try it 1+9, until I can find something more suitable that's not Kodak.
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Allowing Ads
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,946
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
chris,
i strongly suggest to consider rotation processing.it will reduce your processing volume from 1l to a couple of 100ml(look at the instructionsthat came with your tank). you can switch from inversion processing to rotation processing with almost any tank by rolling it back and forth at the edge of a tableor by rigging something up with an old pair of roller skates,good luck happy processing.
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,602
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
Is that what a Uniroller would do?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
ChristopherCoy said:
I don't want to use XTOL at all though. I don't want to use any Kodak chems or film - strictly Ilford.

I'll try it 1+9, until I can find something more suitable that's not Kodak.
Click to expand...

I'd suggest ID-11 then - which film are you using (to determine dilution)?

I don't know why you won't consider Champion Photographic's chemistry.
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,602
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
MattKing said:
I don't know why you won't consider Champion Photographic's chemistry.
Click to expand...

Strictly HP5+.

And I never said I wouldn't consider another developer, I'm just not ready to venture into other stuff yet. I've been stuck on Kodak since high school, it's all I've ever worked with. And now I'm having to change my processes, albeit by personal decision. It's just easier for me and more comfortable for me to use a major player like Ilford right now.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
A replenished developer works best if you are processing film on a regular basis. If your developing is sporatic then a one-shot developer might be best such as Kodak HC-110. The concentrate keeps for a long, long time. It's also quite cheap when you figure how many rolls you can do with a single bottle ai 1+31 and higher dilutions. Look at the following website for information on this developer. www.covingtoninnovations.com/hc110
 

Nikonic

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
53
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format
What does a replenished do, anyways? And by that I mean chemically.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

The chemistry that was formerly made and marketed by Kodak is now made (in North America) by Champion - who are a major player.

Someone else may very well be marketing the Kodak stuff soon.

And as for ID-11 dilution choices, Ilford's fact sheet lists times for using stock ID-11 (7.5 minutes), ID-11 diluted 1 + 1(13 minutes) and ID-11 diluted 1 + 3 (20 minutes)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,602
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
MattKing said:
The chemistry that was formerly made and marketed by Kodak is now made (in North America) by Champion - who are a major player.
Click to expand...


Not major enough for me to readily find without a google search... And they aren't on the shelves in my local photo shop if I need them in a pinch one day.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,856
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have used replenish XTOL for over two years without a problem.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

Gerald C Koch

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Nikonic said:
What does a replenished do, anyways? And by that I mean chemically.
Click to expand...

A replenished developer system recycles most of the developer after use. An amount of either a specific replenisher or fresh developer is added to maintain the developer's strength. An example would be D-76 used with replenisher D-76R. It's economical but there is some change in the developers action after each replenishment cycle. People tend to either love the idea or hate it.
 

Nikonic

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
53
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format

But what is actually happening on a chemical level with these marketed replenishers. Is it an alkali to get the PH back up where it should be? Are there compounds that react with redox byproducts and clear them up or sludge them out? Or is it just a fresh jolt of whatever the reducer was?
 

Mr Bill

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Aug 22, 2006
Messages
1,529
Format
Multi Format

Essentially the byproducts are diluted out with replenisher. (The excess volume either overflows or is carried over into the following solution.) Compared to the processing tank solution, the replenisher is a bit overconcentrated with both developing agent and preservative. Also the pH is higher to boost the tank pH back up a bit.

In the systems that are replenished with original developer, obviously the initial tank solution must change during processing, and should eventually reach some different equilibrium levels. I'd guess that the B&W systems have a large error tolerance which allows this sort of thing. My experience has mainly been in large scale color neg and paper systems, which are generally too finicky for this sort of thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MartinP

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
Jun 23, 2007
Messages
1,569
Location
Netherlands
Format
Medium Format
That sounds like an astonishingly ineffective developing tank. Do you really mean a litre for a couple of rolls of 35mm?! If that wasn't a typo then the first step towards economy would be to replace the tank with a more normal one.

Apart from APX100 and Rodinal (which go so very well together) I seem to use ID11 1+1 for most things, with 1+3 for sheets in trays. This works out at a very reasonable point for cost/longevity when I buy the five litre packs, and is also a very standard and repeatable choice. Occasionally for HP5+ at a higher speed I would use DDX, but there isn't that much difference unless you are going over ISO800.
 

Nikonic

Member
Allowing Ads
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
53
Location
NYC
Format
Multi Format

I guess if you were running 10,000 negs through a machine a month this would end up being economical. But I don't see why anyone would bother with it on a small scale. Just make a new batch.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
55,326
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Nikonic said:
I guess if you were running 10,000 negs through a machine a month this would end up being economical. But I don't see why anyone would bother with it on a small scale. Just make a new batch.
Click to expand...

Using a 250ml tank and stock XTol as an example...

5 litres of XTol stock used one-shot: 20 rolls developed
5 litres of XTol stock used in a 70 ml replenishment regime: the first 5 litres will develop 57 rolls, and all subsequent 5 litre packages will develop 71 rolls.

And your working strength developer will always be at room temperature.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register