How large have you printed with a pinhole negative?

nsurit

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 27, 2005
Messages
1,808
Location
Texas Hill Country
Format
Multi Format
I've done a bit of pinhole photography and the largest I printed to date was an 11X14. My son-in-law has asked if a large mural size print might be produced with reasonable quality from either a 4X5 or 6X17 on 120 negative. I have the ability to produce either however would be interested in knowing what others have experienced. He is thinking color and perhaps 4 feet by 5 feet or perhaps 3 feet by 8 or 9 feet from the 120. Any ideas or experience with going large out there? I would have to have a lab print one this large in color. Bill Barber
 

Jim Jones

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
3,740
Location
Chillicothe MO
Format
Multi Format
At best a 4x5 pinhole contact print will appear slightly unsharp at a normal reading distance. Therefore, a 4x5 foot enlargement will appear slightly unsharp across a small room. Perhaps this is acceptable to some viewers. Getting a mural size color print made to determine this seems expensive to this tightwad. Perhaps a less expensive poster print will settle the question.
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
I have printed 30x40 lith prints from 35mm pinhole negs.
they look wonderful
 

keithwms

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2006
Messages
6,220
Location
Charlottesvi
Format
Multi Format
I have seen ~4 ft prints from 4x5 pinhole, taken on acros. They certainly looked credible to my eye. Scott (Flying Camera) may recall who that was, hit was a photographer had a small show in DC. Federal scenes, as I recall. N.b. the final prints were not analogue and I was too polite if they were digitally sharpened, but they looked undoctored and quite effective.

Anyway, roughly speaking, at enlargements bigger than ~1:1 (contact print), the lack of detail will become evident. But that doesn't mean that the image falls apart.... if the method is suited to the subject, you can go much larger.
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,482
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
I have a friend who routinely prints his 4x5 pinhole shots at 16x20. They look fine.
Pinhole shots always lack detail, it's the nature of the beast, but at a reasonable viewing distance for the print size it's not something you notice any more than you would with a smaller print viewed closer.
As Keith says, if the method suits the subject the print size doesn't matter much.
 

Terje Lindal

Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2006
Messages
17
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
I’ve had a pro lab printing 1,5*2 meters (6 ft * 8 ft) from a 120 (6*7) pinhole for an exhibition a few months ago - printed on aluminum. Sold the picture for about 820 $ (5000 Norwegian Krones) to a couple who to have it in their living room.
I guess the price they were happy to pay kind of indicates the quality.....
 

walter23

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
1,206
Location
Victoria BC
Format
4x5 Format
Anyway, roughly speaking, at enlargements bigger than ~1:1 (contact print), the lack of detail will become evident. But that doesn't mean that the image falls apart.... if the method is suited to the subject, you can go much larger.
Click to expand...

I think you hit it on the head Keith. There's no answer to this question; it just depends on whether the image is suitable for such a big display, taking into account the appearance the pinhole capture method will lend to it.
 

Rich Ullsmith

Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2007
Messages
1,159
Format
Medium Format
Totally agree with walter on the suitability of the image. I print conventionally and lith to 16X20, but stick to scenes where cloud motion is the main subject. Those are great. If the subject requires any detail, I forget about it. Might have something to do with my pinholes and camera motion.
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
Not sure are you referring to me. If so the pinhole negs I printed large are Guilluame Zilli and you can look at his work on his website.

SMBooth said:
Rob would be interested in seeing some of your lith pinholes, do you have a web site?
Click to expand...
 

Guillaume Zuili

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 3, 2005
Messages
2,971
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
There are also some on the gallery here.
If you want sharpness with pinhole you can simulate it by bringing contrast and black way up.
Lith printing is the best for this.
G.
 

Bob Carnie

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
7,735
Location
toronto
Format
Med. Format RF
These french guys and their funny names, I never get them right.


Jerry

PVia said:
Ha, ha, ha...foot in my mouth again. But I knew that Bob had it wrong...

...and Bob should know better ;-)

So sorry and thanks for the correction.
Click to expand...
 

Mike Wilde

Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
2,903
Location
Misissauaga
Format
Multi Format
jnanian said:
i hear guillaume z's 35mm pinhole work is printed HUGE and looks fantastic.
Click to expand...

I was going to comment on Mr. Z's work when I saw this thread.

He had prints in a show in town at Elevator before they moved to thier current location. He actualy was there at the openning, but I did not get a chance to speak with him.

The prints were awesome to see, and BIG - maybe 30x40.

Grain was not quite 'golf ball' sized, but came close, but the effect was what he was aiming for.
 

SMBooth

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
1,192
Location
Melbourne, N
Format
Multi Format
Bob Carnie said:
Not sure are you referring to me. If so the pinhole negs I printed large are Guilluame Zilli and you can look at his work on his website.
Click to expand...

Actuality I meant Rich, but maybe secertly meant Bob, and typed both names . But happy to see all pinhole.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…