My experience is the same.My Kodachrome slides from 60s, 70s and 80s look like new, but many Ektachrome slides have faded. Both kinds stored under similar conditions. Apparently, others have hade much better luck.
I think that a lot depends on the standard of the processing as well as the type of film.
Almost all of my Kodachromes, back to the 1980's and processed by Kodak UK, are fine. similarly Ektachromes from the late 1970's are still as taken, In the latter case, these were also factory processed by Kodak UK when this service was offered through dealers. I also have a large number of E6 Ektachrome taken and processed in Hong Kong in 1988, by the official Fuji lab there, and again these remain good.
OTOH, most of my late Father's E4 Ektachromes, shot in the 60's and 70's, have deteriorated, having been processed at random walk-in smaller labs while he was based in London at that time.
Luck of the draw! With no more Kodachrome, hopping my experience with contemporary Ektachrome will match yours. Still, for permanence, nothing beats BW.
Thanks for the observation. Possibly a difference in storage is the answer.
My Ektachromes were processed by Kodak at the same period of time that they processed my Kodachromes. Luck of the draw? Ektachromes faded beyond any kind of usefulness. I really appreciated those brief years that Kodak offered Kodachrome in MF 120. Unlike most other areas of artistic endeavors, photographers are dependent upon Mass produced materials.
My Kodachrome scans: Photos 50 years old but scanned ten years ago. Family - 35mm Kodachrome | Flickr
Ektachromes from around 35 years ago scanned about ten years ago. Search: ektachrome | Flickr
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?