Something called "AF9" was used before AF2000. It was solid, and IIRC, it was stated that AF2000 was introduced because of instability/risk of explosion of AF9. Maybe that would give some hint...
Anyway, if you take a look at Kodak h2408 (for example, Dead Link Removed ), you will see that the effect of removing the antifoggant is quite minimal; +0.04 in blue low densities. So, it's mostly for "fine-tuning" towards the perfect result, and you probably won't see any difference unless you do a careful side-by-side test. To put this in perspective, the error caused by removing the antifoggant may be below the normal operational tolerances of a motion picture lab.