Are you being deliberately disingenuous? Philosophy of photography, yes. Philosophy of denigrating COPD sufferers, well, huh.
Such comments (and the attitude they reflect) are rife on the Guardian OL where brave keyboard warriors feel free to denigrate. Here on Photrio, I take exception to such remarks.
The Rollei Dutos and Softars are the same and can be used on 3.5 Tessar Rolleifexes or 3.5 Xenar Rolleicords. I have both sets, in Bayonet I, the original Tessar mounts. Identical.
I am pleased to see we are back on appropriate 'photo philosophy'. Please, please, let's keep it up.
I am a fan of the Richard Avedon warts and all school of portraiture. Beats Olan MIlls hands down.
I photographed my only teacher who was dying from "photographer's disease"...Parkinson's.
This is the first I've heard that Parkinson's is apparently caused by being a photographer.
A number of famous photographers died of Parkinson's: Edward Weston for example. Probably genetic, but sometimes said to be caused by frequent exposure to pyrogallol developer. Fingernails turn black due to the exposure.
Stanford University physicians guessed the pyro connection when they met my 33yr old teacher.
My mother, a serious amateur photographer, mentioned that she had read (in Minicam?) "photographer's disease" related to Weston and her hero, Margaret Bourke White.
My teacher's fingernails were not black during the dozen years I knew him, but he had spent a lot of time at RIT in darkrooms before he graduated and switched to Kodachrome. I have no idea about his exposure to photo chemicals at RIT.
The pyro connection is tenuous, but "photographer's disease" was commonly attributed to it (many photographers did get black fingernails back when pyro was a common chemical).
Parkinsons is a syndrome, not an individual disease. Some people live long lives with little more than quivering hands. It's very common.
It's extremely unusual in young people, which interested Stanford in my teacher, whose version caused his body to totally freeze up sometimes, making the carpentry he'd been doing when diagnosed impossible. It almost immediately made his speech very hard to understand..that was the "within" part.
My teacher was diagnosed at 33, was treated semi-successfully at Stanford University with L-DOPA back when that was a wildly experimental drug (they had no idea about dosages). He died at 45, finally managing to produce a very personal slide show called "A Scream From Within"...like hideous psychedelia.
\
It's true that a number of photographers had Parkinsons, but tens of millions didn't. Parkinson's is not well understood and neither are its causes unfortunately.
Parkinson's is the second most common neurological disorder behind Alzheimers, and is growing. Darkroom photography is the millionth least common hobby and declining. I see no reason for concern and have never read a study suggesting darkroom chems have anything at all to do with PD. (There was a synthetic heroin poisoning in the 80s that triggered Parkinson's syndrome in some unfortunates and has been well documented and studied, and was thought to be the trigger for a swift cure to the disease but it hasn't panned out.)
The most common factor for Parkinson's is simply age, which makes it especially painful when young folks get it. (If we all lived to 120 we would all have Parkinson's syndrome.) That pain of a young diagnosis is why there are so many false correlations between activities, diet, chemical exposure etc and the disease.
jtk,
They are your friends. How do you want to photograph them?
Ah, finally we are back on topic again.
That’s okay. This question has been asked before and not answered...Well we were until you posted that.
jtk,
They are your friends. How do you want to photograph them?
That addict situation focused a lot of scientific effort on pesticides for quite some time as a cause of PD but alas.
Yes deep brain stimulation for some is basically a miracle cure, giving the patient his/her life back, if only for a while. (I wouldn't go so far as to describe it as easily targeted and installed though. This is in no way a trivial operation.) There are significant side effects as you might imagine and the therapeutic effect is not permanent, but I'd do it if it was me.
right.
How about a follow up discussion about the photo session experience you were seeking advice about in post 1...
Did they have concern about their assistive devices?
Did you include them in the portrait?
Did you have any emotional experiences because of their ailment?
I didn’t promise anything... and don’t flatter yourself... I’m not stalking or following your posts...
To be clear: Not intentionally offensive. Just intentionally blunt. Offensive is all in your perception. You were the one challenging folks to post their examples “to prove their credibility”.
I’m actually interested in discussing the topic you originally posted. Which is taking pictures of people with “disabilities and other ailments “. Aren’t you?
So...
The installation was done in Phoenix, AZ (NM didn't/doesn't have brain surgeons and drive to PHX is scenic). The individual, a very attractive middle-aged woman, has remained an active elementary school teacher for the past dozen years.
That's as close to perfect as one could hope for. A dozen years of perfect.
Sounds right, tho hoping for "perfect" seems a bit of a stretch
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?