What's wrong with permanent? You can always make more; the thing about photos is the fact that they can be mass produced. Preserving the negative makes more sense.
I don't make a living selling raw photos but I do sell them when someone wants to buy. Dry mounting is quick without the extra fuss, and I offer a guarantee because it's permanent. I'm not in the market to sell to museums - too finicky for me. But that's just me.
Paul
I use archival photo corners, on a rag backing board and under a window mat cut to the image area. Partly because I don't own a press, don't have the space for one, partly because it is one of the truly archival methods.
I have a one of a kind print I did 25 years ago which is, regretfully, dry mounted, as the mount has suffered some, and it isn't rag board. Since it's dry mounted though, there's pretty much nothing to be done about the mount now. I certainly don't want to risk the print by trying to get it off.
Certainly the super flatness of a dry mounted print looks nice, but under a window mat, especially an 8-ply and in a frame it's hard to tell the difference.
[QUOTE I don't know any serious or well known photographers in the US or UK who sell dry mounted prints
As a museum preparator, I can tell you how we do it here:
typically we window matte photographs, and use one of two methods for mounting the image. If it's a loan and is therefore being returned to the lender, we use photo corners so there is nothing permanently affixed to the photograph. (These can be plastic or made from archival paper and linen tape.) If it is in the collection, we use a thin paper (mulberry paper) that is affixed to the photograph as hinges with wheat starch (or rice) paste. This allows us to make "hidden hinges" so that we can float the entire image in the window. It's also better than linen tape because linen tape hinges will often leave a dimple where they attach to the photo. Wheat starch paste is very easy to remove as well, but strong enough to hold the photo in place.
I am interested in learning all the common accepted methods to mount a print. But, I am especially interested in how "you" mount your prints, both small and large prints, and prints that are sold. Thank you.
As a museum preparator, I can tell you how we do it here:
typically we window matte photographs, and use one of two methods for mounting the image. If it's a loan and is therefore being returned to the lender, we use photo corners so there is nothing permanently affixed to the photograph. (These can be plastic or made from archival paper and linen tape.) If it is in the collection, we use a thin paper (mulberry paper) that is affixed to the photograph as hinges with wheat starch (or rice) paste. This allows us to make "hidden hinges" so that we can float the entire image in the window. It's also better than linen tape because linen tape hinges will often leave a dimple where they attach to the photo. Wheat starch paste is very easy to remove as well, but strong enough to hold the photo in place.
How do you assure absolute flatness?
How do you assure absolute flatness?
.....I think we need to wait another 100 years to know for sure what is best
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?