Thanks. Do you think I necessarily need to go that big? The Compound #5 I was able to find was tricky to track down, and I'm saving it for my other, larger brass lens. If this one fits a Copal #3, that would be very convenient and less expensive than a #5.
Are there drawbacks to front/back-mounting a shutter rather than paying for the shutter to be integrated into the lens? Thanks.
I just checked at
https://skgrimes.com/shutters/ and a Copal #3 might to.
Drawbacks to front mounting? Vignetting by the rear of the tube is possible, especially with short wide angle lenses. Shouldn't be a problem with your ~ 150 mm magic lantern lens. By the way, try to measure its focal length. The result might surprise you.
Mounting the lens in shutter? Costly, and your lens isn't made for that. It doesn't seem to have a diaphragm, so you or your machinist can't be sure where the glasses should be located in relation to the shutter's blades.
I'm not sure you understand what front mounting entails. I have a small heap of lenses set up for front mounting, and a smaller heap of cup-shaped adapters for front mounting. Lens screws into adapter, adapter screws into a shutters' front tube. More lenses than adapters because some of my lenses have the same rear threads and because a few were made to screw directly into a shutter. I have no shutters dedicated to a only one front-mounted lens.
You have a Compound #5. Great, you can use it for the two brass lenses you've mentioned. Unless, that is, the longer lens is actually made of two cells that screw directly into, respectively, the front and rear of the shutter.