How did you choose your film?

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,389
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
ChristopherCoy said:
But my original question was about film, not developers.
Click to expand...

Tri-X and HP5+ are good starting points. Both are fast enough to use smaller f/stops and higher shutter speeds and have the latitude to shoot in dimmer light.
 

grain elevator

Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,294
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
The way film behave is influenced by developers, so why try to separate the two? Btw. I'm under the impression that some films are especially sensitive to different developers, HP5+ and Kentmere 400 under its various names seem to be among them. This idea I got mostly from obsessing over pictures online and https://fotoimport.no/filmHP5 (have fun staring at this for hours, as you seem at least as obsessive as I am!), I haven't experimented enough myself to be sure of anything.
Me, I can't seem to settle. I always intend to, buy a brick of one film, use it up more or less but then usually I want something else. I guess I would have sort of settled on TMY-2, had they not increased the price so much. It's ok though.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,106
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
My Dad brought home a roll of 127 Verichrome Pan to go with the Brownie Starmite I received for my 8th birthday - both undoubtedly purchased using his Kodak Canada employee discount.
That was reinforced when, for my 11th birthday, he brought home the 616 folder, some more Verichrome Pan, and all the necessities for learning to develop film and make contact prints.
Everything since has essentially been an evolution from there, with a heavy Kodak influence.
Currently, I think that T-Max 400 is the best black and white film out there.
The "choose one film and stick with it" advice remains, IMHO, excellent advice for someone learning about using black and white film. The lessons learned from that approach can then be applied when one wants to try out new films.
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,102
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
"Sticking with it" might be two months for some folks, 2 years for others.

Tried what ever was on hand to start with -- Verichrome was a forgiving film to use as a beginner, but once I had figured a rough direction to head with my photography, I tended toward slow, fine grain film. At the time, Kodak Panatomix-X in 120 fit the bill...developed in Microdol-X 1:3.

Switching formats in the late 70s to 4x5, meant a new film and I settled for what the camera store had...Royal Pan, Super XX, some Plus-X if I remember right. Eventually went to TMax100.

Alternative photography led to different negative requirements (and larger formats)...the big one being no TMax100 due to its UV blocking layer (TMax 400 okay). FP4+ is now my primary film as it expands well for my needs. But I have specialty films I can use if needed.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
grain elevator said:
Weird! Is the mite somehow unbeknownst to me revered in North America or why did they put its name in a camera?
Click to expand...

It was supposed to be starBrite, but the designers assitant made a typo.
 

relistan

Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2013
Messages
1,591
Location
Dublin, Ireland
Format
Multi Format
When I got back into film I started with Fomapan 100 because I bought an Exakta in Poland and then was in Prague and Fomapan film was everywhere. It was crazy cheap. I took home ten rolls. Then I bought it from Freestyle in bulk for several years. I shot Delta 100 as my other film because of the look and the fine grain. Then I moved to Germany and APX-100 was available at the drug store by my house for cheap so I started shooting that. WOW that was better film. Ever since I’ve mostly shot that, ADOX Silvermax 100 which is its cousin, or Delta 100. In 120 I still mostly shoot Fomapan 100, Delta 100, or HP5.

I originally only used Rodinal for everything but switched to mostly Diafine for a few years. Eventually I landed on XTOL and occasionally PC-Glycol. I still use Rodinal on Fomapan 100 in 120.
 

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
Sirius Glass said:
Tri-X and HP5+ are good starting points. Both are fast enough to use smaller f/stops and higher shutter speeds and have the latitude to shoot in dimmer light.
Click to expand...

Maybe the questions are:
- Do you want classic b&w look with nice grain but overall very good film? Tri-X.
- Do you want digital look with awesome tonality? Tmax 400.
- Something between previous two? HP5.
 

Disappointed_Horse

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
168
Location
Florida
Format
35mm
I have my film developed at commercial labs so I prefer to use conventional films rather than T-grain films. I have tried TMax 400 and Tmax 3200 and was disappointed with the results. I use both Tri-X and HP5+ and like them both about equally (I generally shoot Tri-X at 250 and HP5+ at box speed). I also use FP4+ for brighter conditions.

I feel a little more confident in Ilford's long term viability and commitment to black-and-white film photography, so I tend to prefer their products.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,106
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
grain elevator said:
Weird! Is the mite somehow unbeknownst to me revered in North America or why did they put its name in a camera?
Click to expand...

I expect the "mite" part is related to "mighty" .
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
michael_r said:
Doesn’t matter. He loves posting that chart, even though I was the first to post it on APUG.
Click to expand...

I feel like there's a wager in there somewhere. Which one of you wants to give up a beloved camera if you weren't the first, and I'll search the apug archives tirelessly to find out for sure? I'll do that for you because I'm such a generous person....and I'll get one of your cameras.
 

BradS

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2004
Messages
8,120
Location
Soulsbyville, California
Format
35mm
I’m Spartacus!
 

Adrian Bacon

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
2,086
Location
Petaluma, CA.
Format
Multi Format
This is probably strange, but for me personally, the first order of business is how the film handles after its been processed. It’s it’s hard to handle and doesn’t lay flat, I generally avoid it unless it has some other aspect that I have to have. From there, it’s then a matter of traditional grain or newer grain, then from there, film speed. Sometimes I rank film speed above emulsion type.
 

Adrian Bacon

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
2,086
Location
Petaluma, CA.
Format
Multi Format

this is true. I’ve noticed that a lot of the “complexity” or “difficulty” tends to be self induced variables via work habits that many workers seem to be unaware that they’re doing to themselves. Removing variables tends to simplify things considerably.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,318
Format
4x5 Format
michael_r said:
A much overblown philosophy, by the way.
Click to expand...
Well, I picked the world’s best at first.

Kodachrome 25 and Panatomic-X 35mm. I also carried Kodachrome 64 and 200 and Tri-X but whenever possible I used the slowest film the lighting conditions allowed. Somewhere I read Velvia 50 was best so I switched to that.

Then I bought a 4x5 camera, Kodak bought me and I started using TMY2 exclusively.

Now I am messing around with a little of everything.
 

Wallendo

Subscriber
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
1,409
Location
North Carolina
Format
35mm
My choice of film varies with the cameras I use.

My favorite film is TX400 - it just looks like what I expect B&W to look like. I don't use it on my older mechanical cameras, because the film's speed forces me to often shoot at 1/500s and f16 - not my favorite combination. For those cameras, I tend to shoot FP4+. I also like to keep Fomapan 100 on hand because it seems to have a "retro" look that I enjoy for a change of pace.

For color, which I shoot much less often, I generally go with Velvia 50.

With current COVID travel restrictions, I find myself shooting the same scenes repeatedly and have been playing around with different films including Finesse 400, Rollei IR 400, and I just bought 100 ft of TMAX 100 for a change of pace.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
ChristopherCoy said:
So how did you choose your film?
Click to expand...
hi christopher
i buy like a big box of expired or soon to be expired film and dump it into a bigger box, with more of the same.
i stick my hand in the box and pull out a roll and put it in the camera. i put the camera at IDK f4 or 5.6 or wide open
depending on the day and situation, and the shutter anywhere between 1/15S-1/125S depending... and i just push the button, if it is a box camera i just load it and shoot.
i don't differentiate between film stocks and iso's. i just put the film in and use it.
when i process it, i develop it all at the same ( color or b/w ) time for about 10 minutes split between 5+5 caffenol c and whatever print developer i have lying around
i haven't exposed film in over a year now and have between IDK 10-25 rolls to develop from 2019. year and 1/2 should give me enough distance to have fresh eyes
when i look at the negatives... can't wait because i processed about 20 rolls the last run i did, and didn't see the stuff i wanted to see
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format


How many anti-anxiety pills do you take each day? I need a xanax just reading that post. Too many unknowns for me.
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
ChristopherCoy said:
How many anti-anxiety pills do you take each day? I need a xanax just reading that post. Too many unknowns for me.
Click to expand...
none, none of this stuff really matters too much so i roll with it.
i figure the film i end up with is between iso 50 and 1600, any of those films will get enough light, and i process the film enough so i've got nothing to worry about, there's always something on the film. been doing it like this for IDK a decade or more never had trouble.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,389
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format

Well my photographs must be more valuable, because I take the time to expose the film with the advice of calibrated light meters.
 

Adrian Bacon

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
2,086
Location
Petaluma, CA.
Format
Multi Format
ChristopherCoy said:
How many anti-anxiety pills do you take each day? I need a xanax just reading that post. Too many unknowns for me.
Click to expand...

Not much of a point in getting worked up over things you have no control over. It always amazes me when I'm people watching to see people get absolutely torn up over things that they have no control over and can't change. Myself, I get torn up over what I can control and can change. If I can't control it or change it, then I just don't spend mental energy on it. In the case of @jnantz this happens to be part of his process. For some people, the joy is just doing and seeing what you get. You can either obsess over all the little variables, or you can just get on with shooting and see what you get. If you didn't get anything you like, then keep shooting. The reality of the matter is for every great picture you see from a photographer, there are at least a handful of "meh" pictures that he/she took. I don't know a single photographer that takes 5 star photos on every shutter click. Even the greats have a whole pile of images that are "meh" that the general public just doesn't see because they edit them out and only show the best ones.
 
OP
OP

ChristopherCoy

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 9, 2011
Messages
3,599
Location
On a boat.
Format
Multi Format
Adrian Bacon said:
Not much of a point in getting worked up over things you have no control over.
Click to expand...

My AA Sponsor and all the text says the same thing. That still doesn't make it easy to do!
 

ParkerSmithPhoto

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
Stephen DiRado is an amazing photographer. That he is not more widely known in the community is a terrible shame. He is one of the very few photographers where I will visit their website and look at their photos again and again. I wish he had a few books I could buy. He has done some superlative work.
 

Bill Burk

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 9, 2010
Messages
9,318
Format
4x5 Format
I am starting to experiment with Double-X as a replacement for TMY2 in 35mm

Adrian Bacon might not like it for the acetate base. It wasn’t engineered to be wound tightly so I expect it will curl.

But I do expect picturesque grain
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…