Hood for a Rolleiflex 2.8A Quandary - Bayonet II or...?

Sombra

A
Sombra

  • 3
  • 0
  • 57
The Gap

H
The Gap

  • 5
  • 2
  • 81
Ithaki Steps

H
Ithaki Steps

  • 2
  • 0
  • 92

Forum statistics

Threads
199,010
Messages
2,784,556
Members
99,768
Latest member
wwestergard
Recent bookmarks
0

Why a poll?

  • yes

  • no


Results are only viewable after voting.

davela

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
2,387
Location
Satellite Beach, FL
Format
35mm
I've been trying to find a hood for my Rolleiflex 2.8A. The authentic ones from the 1950's, when available used are pretty expensive, so I bought an aftermarket Bay II hood (these are made in China and are commonly sold on eBay). This hood arrived and appears to have the correct outer diameter for the outer bayonet flange on my camera, but it will not engage because the trio of curved slots milled into the hood diameter are shorter in arc length than the mating flange pieces on the lens. My question is: Is there more than one Bayonet II "standard". I know for instance, that Bayonet II size is also the specified as the proper hood size for certain later era F3.5 Rolleiflex models (like the 3.5F if I'm not mistaken). I believe most Bayonet II accessories are also marketed for these later Rolleiflexes cameras as well (the 2.8A is sort of an orphaned camera, but I just love it!). I do own a few Bay II filters (AKA B36) that fit my 2.8A fine. All of this is pretty strange!

By the way, the aftermarket Chinese hood is not a low quality item, it is made of metal, has a nice paint job, and otherwise well made. I own another Chinese metal Bayonet III hood which I use very successfully on my Rolleiflex 2.8C, so I do not think this is likely to be a manufacturing fault. I may be able to file out the slots one the hood to enlarge them - sort of a cheesy fix though (or better yet, mill them out if I can find access to a milling machine).
 

Rayt

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
285
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Format
Multi Format
I have the Rolleiflex 2.8A. The hood for it is unique to that model and will not fit on later models. It took me a long time to locate one on eBay. Bay II hoods for later models will not mount on the 2.8A. Bay II accessories like filters will fit. As for Bay II lens caps there are two versions - long and short for late and early models.
 
Last edited:

gorbas

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
1,269
Location
Vancouver, Canada
Format
35mm Pan
For my 3.5F I need Rollei B II hood with “outer bayonet”. The same kind of hood but in BI I need for Baby Rolleiflex.
Nobody I asked so far was able to tell me “proper” naming of those different hoods types.
07691713-1E79-447C-A51E-74092C26F930.jpeg

On the left : Rollei BI, on the right Rollei BII.
Maybe you need BII hood with “outer bayonet”. Does Rollei BII “straight” exist at all??
 

Rayt

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
285
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Format
Multi Format
Bay II hood for Rolleiflex 2.8A
 

Attachments

  • D20A9995-832D-441E-A341-C01760959368.jpeg
    D20A9995-832D-441E-A341-C01760959368.jpeg
    329.5 KB · Views: 131
  • 30D2A556-9771-4A25-A3B9-10882FA8D8BE.jpeg
    30D2A556-9771-4A25-A3B9-10882FA8D8BE.jpeg
    342.4 KB · Views: 124
  • 249F91E6-5782-42BB-860E-46ED01B9919D.jpeg
    249F91E6-5782-42BB-860E-46ED01B9919D.jpeg
    456.3 KB · Views: 141

beemermark

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
869
Format
4x5 Format
I bought a Bay II to 43mm adapter for my 2.8F. It was cheap, cheaper than a Rollei filter. The 43mm filter (and adapter) is the same outer diameter of the lens so you don't even notice the adapter.
 

Rayt

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
285
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Format
Multi Format
I bought a Bay II to 43mm adapter for my 2.8F. It was cheap, cheaper than a Rollei filter. The 43mm filter (and adapter) is the same outer diameter of the lens so you don't even notice the adapter.

That’s the best solution for hard to find sizes. I used a Bay IV to 49mm adapter before finding the hood for my Rolleiwide.
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,902
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
You can see in Rayt's photos that the outer tabs that the metal hoods use are aligned with the inner openings for a filter. Effectively rotated 180 degrees from a later Bay II design.

Rayt, could you post a photo of the back? It might let the OP (and others) know if a later hood can be hacked to work. I seem to remember that I was able to rotate a later hood backwards, but it was not stable. Been a while since I had an A, and I was lucky enough to locate a correct hood after some time.
 

Rayt

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
285
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Format
Multi Format
Two types of Bay II hoods
 

Attachments

  • B35E50B7-98AE-40F1-815A-F80BB79F978E.jpeg
    B35E50B7-98AE-40F1-815A-F80BB79F978E.jpeg
    1.3 MB · Views: 111
  • 59A6DF16-905C-4D4F-B75C-FC3FB1D31997.jpeg
    59A6DF16-905C-4D4F-B75C-FC3FB1D31997.jpeg
    1 MB · Views: 112
  • 7F0EC5ED-874A-460A-8E9C-C46055A44889.jpeg
    7F0EC5ED-874A-460A-8E9C-C46055A44889.jpeg
    580.2 KB · Views: 117

Rayt

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
285
Location
Santa Rosa, CA
Format
Multi Format
I don’t see how the later hood can be modded because the lip of the hood comes in contact with the rim of the viewing lens so can’t be mounted. it isn‘t like it mounts but off by some degrees.
 

beemermark

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 21, 2008
Messages
869
Format
4x5 Format
I bought a Bay II to 43mm adapter for my 2.8F. It was cheap, cheaper than a Rollei filter. The 43mm filter (and adapter) is the same outer diameter of the lens so you don't even notice the adapter.

That’s the best solution for hard to find sizes. I used a Bay IV to 49mm adapter before finding the hood for my Rolleiwide.

Yes, the adapter uses the inner filter bayonet. You can buy one cheap, works well while you hunt for the Holy Grail Rollei hood. No need to butcher a later Rollei hood.
 
OP
OP

davela

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
2,387
Location
Satellite Beach, FL
Format
35mm
Thanks for all those who posted. Rayt your post with the photos of the two types of Bay-II hoods tells me all I need to know, and also what I suspected. There is more than one "Bay-II" !

I also won't be able to modify my hood, at least not without some careful machining, but that's not even an assured solution. Other than not engaging the bayonet lugs, I now see that the outer hood diameter is too thick. This causes an interference with the viewing lens flange and the iris/shutter control wheels (as some of you realized).

Yes maybe an inner Bay-II to some standard filter thread might lead to a solution, but I will still need to locate an appropriate hood for that - probably not a big deal.
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,902
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
Plan on using a circular hood.

Blocking a small section of the viewing lens has almost no effect on the focus screen image, and the benefits of a hood far outweigh any viewing lens effect.
 

Kino

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 20, 2006
Messages
7,767
Location
Orange, Virginia
Format
Multi Format
I bought a Bay II to 43mm adapter for my 2.8F. It was cheap, cheaper than a Rollei filter. The 43mm filter (and adapter) is the same outer diameter of the lens so you don't even notice the adapter.

Where did you find this adapter? All I can find are Bay II to 39mm...
 

Trask

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 23, 2005
Messages
1,930
Location
Virginia (northern)
Format
35mm RF
You may be able to find an original -- I did -- by looking carefully at the photo images in ads selling Rolleiflex hoods. The correct hood for a 2.8A is marked "34" followed by a "0" with a slash through it to indicate diameter on the "bottom" side of the hood -- the Rollei logo is usually on the "top" side of Rollei hoods. I found this info several years ago in a post by "flstutterheim" on photo.net, to give credit where credit is due -- here's the URL: https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/223937-need-a-rollei-lens-hood/
 

JPD

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
2,156
Location
Sweden
Format
Medium Format
You may be able to find an original -- I did -- by looking carefully at the photo images in ads selling Rolleiflex hoods. The correct hood for a 2.8A is marked "34" followed by a "0" with a slash through it to indicate diameter on the "bottom" side of the hood -- the Rollei logo is usually on the "top" side of Rollei hoods.

This hood is marked "34⌀" on the same side as the Rollei logo and looks like the correct one. https://www.ebay.com/itm/304130687953
 
OP
OP

davela

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
2,387
Location
Satellite Beach, FL
Format
35mm
You may be able to find an original -- I did -- by looking carefully at the photo images in ads selling Rolleiflex hoods. The correct hood for a 2.8A is marked "34" followed by a "0" with a slash through it to indicate diameter on the "bottom" side of the hood -- the Rollei logo is usually on the "top" side of Rollei hoods. I found this info several years ago in a post by "flstutterheim" on photo.net, to give credit where credit is due -- here's the URL: https://www.photo.net/forums/topic/223937-need-a-rollei-lens-hood/

This is in fact exactly what I did (before reading this post). I saw such a hood, at a moderate price, and bought it, figuring it was probably for the 2.8A and taking a chance. It works perfectly!
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom