Regardless of whether visitors to the site will or will not understand traditional photography, Walker has a point.
I assume that your site is aimed toward a broad audience, and not just the type of folks we find here on APUG. If not aimed toward a broad audience, ignore my comments below.
The "about the print" section comes off a bit negative. You say a lot about what the prints are not, but don't speak to the tonal range, luminosity, texture, etc, etc. All of this may be obvious to those who understand and appreciate silver-based photography, but not to everyone. And even if they do understand, I think you want to be more positive (i.e. why your prints are better, not that others are worse). So you can leave in your current points, but balance them with the positive.
You might want to add some comments on contact printing and the implications it has for the creation of the original image.
I'd even go as far as to state the obvious - that no computer screen can fully convey the subtleties of the real image. My 2 cents.