I'll second that. My first XTOL batch ran from 2006 to 2017 and did hundreds of films using my personal replenishment rate of 90ml per film. Eventually it became murky due to accumulated dye and I started a new batch which has worked perfectly to date. If handled appropriately the working stock of XTOL is stored in a bottle that's always full to the top - no air space to prompt oxidation.I have used XTOL and replenished XTOL for years. The last decade I have been using only replenished XTOL which properly stored can last for years. Why XTOL? You will be glad that you asked!
View attachment 340505
My vote is for XTOL. Replenishment isn't necessary (but it can save even more money) and you can use it one-shot with decent longevity and value.
Thanks for all the comments and advice!
A few thoughts of my own, in no particular order:
I’m currently using D-76, and I’m fairly confident it died in the bottle, so I’ll have to test it somehow. So I’m not sure it’s really meant for my use case.
I have thought about ordering raw chems, but honestly I have no idea where to start with that. Honestly, there’s almost too much info online, and it’s kind of overwhelming.
I considered Rodinal (and it’s clones) as an option, but I honestly don’t like the look it gives on some films. The film looks almost like sandpaper sometimes! While I don’t mind grain, I don’t want that much grain.
Xtol looks like an interesting option @Sirius Glass, I’ll have to look into it. Although honestly, I know very little about replenishment, so I was kind of avoiding it.
@brian steinberger I found 2 types of LPD, liquid and powder. What’s the best option for someone like me who develops a few prints every couple of months? Seems like longevity is not an issue with it at all. And, could I use it as a reversal first developer, in theory?
Thanks again everyone!
We did the math in another thread. It doesn't save money to do replenished over normal xtol, you get about the same number of rolls.
That said, for longevity it can't be beat. And I am pleased with the quality, good grain, good sharpness, easy to use, regardless of full strength, one shot, or replenished. I store the fresh Xtol in wine bags I got from amazon. With no oxygen, xtol in the wine bag keeps far longer than the recommended 6 months, and it's cheap either way, you'll get 70ish rolls of film for your $15.
Anyway, I mainly use xtol replenished (I'm on 70ml per roll right now and mostly use 1+1 times) and it is mindlessly easy and very good.
I also really like pyrocat HD, but I still personally recommend xtol for OP.
We did the math in another thread. It doesn't save money to do replenished over normal xtol, you get about the same number of rolls.
That said, for longevity it can't be beat. And I am pleased with the quality, good grain, good sharpness, easy to use, regardless of full strength, one shot, or replenished. I store the fresh Xtol in wine bags I got from amazon. With no oxygen, xtol in the wine bag keeps far longer than the recommended 6 months, and it's cheap either way, you'll get 70ish rolls of film for your $15.
Anyway, I mainly use xtol replenished (I'm on 70ml per roll right now and mostly use 1+1 times) and it is mindlessly easy and very good.
I also really like pyrocat HD, but I still personally recommend xtol for OP.
However replenished XTOL provides finer grain, better edge sharpness and better tonality than stock XTOL.
1:1 I need to put a little extra chems in jobo to match Kodak 100ml per film requirement.
Still great for 120
I'll second that. My first XTOL batch ran from 2006 to 2017 and did hundreds of films using my personal replenishment rate of 90ml per film. Eventually it became murky due to accumulated dye and I started a new batch which has worked perfectly to date. If handled appropriately the working stock of XTOL is stored in a bottle that's always full to the top - no air space to prompt oxidation.
A difficulty with one shot developers diluted from stock is that the stock bottle gradually becomes empty with an increasing airspace. Oxidation bites harder as the decreasing volume of stock ages.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?