Help with deciding what chemistry is right for me

End Table

A
End Table

  • 1
  • 1
  • 72
Cafe Art

A
Cafe Art

  • 8
  • 3
  • 197
Sciuridae

A
Sciuridae

  • 6
  • 3
  • 193
Takatoriyama

D
Takatoriyama

  • 6
  • 3
  • 179

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,660
Messages
2,762,586
Members
99,432
Latest member
sciencegirl100
Recent bookmarks
0

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
853
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Hi!

I’m currently thinking about restocking on chems, but I want to think a lot more about what I get this time instead of just going to the shop and getting whatever chems they have there.

The name of the game is longevity. I don’t print or process super often, but I do want to be able to process stuff without worrying about my developer dying (which I believe has just happened to me and ruined a roll).

I have some thoughts about it already, but getting more opinions couldn’t hurt.
  • Film developer: I like the idea of a 1 shot developer for film, and I have used HC-110 and liked the results I got. So, I’ll probably pick up a liter of FPPs equivalent.
  • Paper developer/B&W reversal first dev: unsure what developer would fit this roll. Ilford Multigrade seems like it would fit the bill, shelf life seems long, and dilutions of 1+14 mean I can use very little chemistry per print. Please let me know your experience.
  • Stop bath: Lasts pretty much forever, not super worried about it.
  • Fixer: heard that Hypam fixer lasts basically forever in a low oxygen environment, and it’s a good deal. Any other suggestions?

Finally, storage, do I get a bunch of small bottles to store the chems in? Do I look for storage bladders like for wine? Do I not worry about it?

Thanks!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,174
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I have used XTOL and replenished XTOL for years. The last decade I have been using only replenished XTOL which properly stored can last for years. Why XTOL? You will be glad that you asked!
XTOL.png
 

cliveh

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
7,492
Format
35mm RF
D76 at 1:1
 

Paul Howell

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
9,529
Location
Scottsdale Az
Format
Multi Format
I do not shoot as much film as I had in the past and moved to one shot chemistry. For film I use Rodinal clone for slower film like Tmax 100 and Foma 100, for faster film I use HC 110, dilution E it is the newer version, not sure if it will last as long the older version. For paper I use Freestyle house brand which is rebranded Clayton as I get it in smaller size. I use my old glass bottles to store stop bath, fix, and clearing agent. I use to keep DK 50, MCM 100 and D76 on hand, I do miss MCM 100, but at $48 a gallon I would rather buy more film.
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,290
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
I have standardized on Rodinal.
The concentrate lasts forever, and it is very economical at 1+50, and even 1+25.
A good one-shot, high acutance developer...no extra bottles needed.
Some folks whinge about it not being "fine grain", but that's not an issue for me since I shoot large and medium format.
Besides, I prefer sharp grain over mushy grain.
 

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
2,992
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
I would recommend LPD for paper developer. Stuff lasts forever. I haven’t had good luck with multigrade and longevity.

For film I’d recommend ID-11. Lasts a long time. HC-110 or Rodinal would be good too, probably better for very infrequent developing.

Stop bath from ilford and Hypam is what I’ve always used. No problems there.
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
853
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Thanks for all the comments and advice!

A few thoughts of my own, in no particular order:

I’m currently using D-76, and I’m fairly confident it died in the bottle, so I’ll have to test it somehow. So I’m not sure it’s really meant for my use case.

I have thought about ordering raw chems, but honestly I have no idea where to start with that. Honestly, there’s almost too much info online, and it’s kind of overwhelming.

I considered Rodinal (and it’s clones) as an option, but I honestly don’t like the look it gives on some films. The film looks almost like sandpaper sometimes! While I don’t mind grain, I don’t want that much grain.

Xtol looks like an interesting option @Sirius Glass, I’ll have to look into it. Although honestly, I know very little about replenishment, so I was kind of avoiding it.

@brian steinberger I found 2 types of LPD, liquid and powder. What’s the best option for someone like me who develops a few prints every couple of months? Seems like longevity is not an issue with it at all. And, could I use it as a reversal first developer, in theory?

Thanks again everyone!
 

mwdake

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
774
Location
CO, USA
Format
Multi Format
I’ve always used Artcraft for raw chemicals for mixing up various developers.
Good range with great prices and service.
Formulas for many developers can be found online or look for the Film Developing Cookbook or Darkroom Cookbook by Steve Anchell
 

Maris

Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
1,549
Location
Noosa, Australia
Format
Multi Format
I have used XTOL and replenished XTOL for years. The last decade I have been using only replenished XTOL which properly stored can last for years. Why XTOL? You will be glad that you asked!
View attachment 340505
I'll second that. My first XTOL batch ran from 2006 to 2017 and did hundreds of films using my personal replenishment rate of 90ml per film. Eventually it became murky due to accumulated dye and I started a new batch which has worked perfectly to date. If handled appropriately the working stock of XTOL is stored in a bottle that's always full to the top - no air space to prompt oxidation.

A difficulty with one shot developers diluted from stock is that the stock bottle gradually becomes empty with an increasing airspace. Oxidation bites harder as the decreasing volume of stock ages.
 

brian steinberger

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
2,992
Location
Pennsylvania
Format
Med. Format RF
I use the powder LPD and I think most people do. It’s cheaper and lasts indefinitely until it’s mixed into solution. And once mixed in solution lasts forever too.

Rodinal is not for everyone, so I understand what you’re saying about the grain. HC-110 would be better choice for you. Not familiar with current HC-110. I’ve heard it’s not the same quality as it always was. Might want to research that. In general HC-110 is very similar in look to ID-11/D-76.
 

Craig

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
2,241
Location
Calgary
Format
Multi Format
Replentished Xtol seems to have a very long life, it makes an excellent film developer.
 

Brad Deputy

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 23, 2021
Messages
171
Location
Martha Lake, WA
Format
35mm
My vote is for XTOL. Replenishment isn't necessary (but it can save even more money) and you can use it one-shot with decent longevity and value.

Being a long D-76 user, nothing was left behind using XTOL. It really brings the high definition to tabular based film emulsions.

One recommendation: skip TMAX developer. I never could tame the grain or overdevelopment without cutting 30% or more from recommended times.
 

cmacd123

Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,302
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
one thing to do if mixing stocks like D76 is to store them in a series of FULL bottles, preferably made of Brown Glass. Do leave a small buubble to the top, perhaps 1 cm from the cap. as glass will not expand. a 4oz bottle diluted 1:1 will fill a one reel 35mm tank.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,631
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
Easy
B&W xtol
C41 flexicolor.
 

Moose22

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Messages
1,158
Location
The Internet
Format
Medium Format
My vote is for XTOL. Replenishment isn't necessary (but it can save even more money) and you can use it one-shot with decent longevity and value.

We did the math in another thread. It doesn't save money to do replenished over normal xtol, you get about the same number of rolls.

That said, for longevity it can't be beat. And I am pleased with the quality, good grain, good sharpness, easy to use, regardless of full strength, one shot, or replenished. I store the fresh Xtol in wine bags I got from amazon. With no oxygen, xtol in the wine bag keeps far longer than the recommended 6 months, and it's cheap either way, you'll get 70ish rolls of film for your $15.

Anyway, I mainly use xtol replenished (I'm on 70ml per roll right now and mostly use 1+1 times) and it is mindlessly easy and very good.


I also really like pyrocat HD, but I still personally recommend xtol for OP.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,174
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Thanks for all the comments and advice!

A few thoughts of my own, in no particular order:

I’m currently using D-76, and I’m fairly confident it died in the bottle, so I’ll have to test it somehow. So I’m not sure it’s really meant for my use case.

I have thought about ordering raw chems, but honestly I have no idea where to start with that. Honestly, there’s almost too much info online, and it’s kind of overwhelming.

I considered Rodinal (and it’s clones) as an option, but I honestly don’t like the look it gives on some films. The film looks almost like sandpaper sometimes! While I don’t mind grain, I don’t want that much grain.

Xtol looks like an interesting option @Sirius Glass, I’ll have to look into it. Although honestly, I know very little about replenishment, so I was kind of avoiding it.

@brian steinberger I found 2 types of LPD, liquid and powder. What’s the best option for someone like me who develops a few prints every couple of months? Seems like longevity is not an issue with it at all. And, could I use it as a reversal first developer, in theory?

Thanks again everyone!

XTOL is very forgiving. Replishing is after 5 rolls on adds 70ml/roll to the replenished XTOL storage bottle and then on pouring out the developer, it is poured back in the storage bottle filling to the top to keep air out. The remainder is discarded. Replenishment is the least expensive way to use a developer and I have kept a replenished bottle going for years before I discarded it.
We did the math in another thread. It doesn't save money to do replenished over normal xtol, you get about the same number of rolls.

That said, for longevity it can't be beat. And I am pleased with the quality, good grain, good sharpness, easy to use, regardless of full strength, one shot, or replenished. I store the fresh Xtol in wine bags I got from amazon. With no oxygen, xtol in the wine bag keeps far longer than the recommended 6 months, and it's cheap either way, you'll get 70ish rolls of film for your $15.

Anyway, I mainly use xtol replenished (I'm on 70ml per roll right now and mostly use 1+1 times) and it is mindlessly easy and very good.


I also really like pyrocat HD, but I still personally recommend xtol for OP.

However replenished XTOL provides finer grain, better edge sharpness and better tonality than stock XTOL.
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,631
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
Xtol 1:1 for BW
Flexicolor for c41
 

Radost

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2021
Messages
1,631
Location
USA from Ukraine
Format
Multi Format
We did the math in another thread. It doesn't save money to do replenished over normal xtol, you get about the same number of rolls.

That said, for longevity it can't be beat. And I am pleased with the quality, good grain, good sharpness, easy to use, regardless of full strength, one shot, or replenished. I store the fresh Xtol in wine bags I got from amazon. With no oxygen, xtol in the wine bag keeps far longer than the recommended 6 months, and it's cheap either way, you'll get 70ish rolls of film for your $15.

Anyway, I mainly use xtol replenished (I'm on 70ml per roll right now and mostly use 1+1 times) and it is mindlessly easy and very good.


I also really like pyrocat HD, but I still personally recommend xtol for OP.

1:1 I need to put a little extra chems in jobo to match Kodak 100ml per film requirement.
Still great for 120
 

Moose22

Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2021
Messages
1,158
Location
The Internet
Format
Medium Format
However replenished XTOL provides finer grain, better edge sharpness and better tonality than stock XTOL.

This is debatable. The difference is quite small and, in fact, this has been debated to death.

That said, it is not worse. Still recommend however OP chooses to use it.

1:1 I need to put a little extra chems in jobo to match Kodak 100ml per film requirement.
Still great for 120

Yeah, you are correct. I can understand that. But that's using one shot. Stock is 75 rolls normally, replenished 71ish rolls. If you have to use 100ml you're getting 50 rolls for your $15.

Still, cheap as chips. Still stores well. I still recommend, using any method you chose.
 

bags27

Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Messages
557
Location
USA
Format
Medium Format
Xtol produces fantastic whites, but I can't seem to bond with it overall. I keep coming back to Pyrocat HD, which, of course, is toxically toward the other end of the scale from Xtol. But I am always so pleased with the rendering.
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
853
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
B&H is saying “Screw you” and won’t ship LPD dev powder. But shipping the (more expensive) liquid is fine? WTF B&H???
 

Philippe-Georges

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 11, 2005
Messages
2,659
Location
Flanders Fields
Format
Medium Format
I'll second that. My first XTOL batch ran from 2006 to 2017 and did hundreds of films using my personal replenishment rate of 90ml per film. Eventually it became murky due to accumulated dye and I started a new batch which has worked perfectly to date. If handled appropriately the working stock of XTOL is stored in a bottle that's always full to the top - no air space to prompt oxidation.

A difficulty with one shot developers diluted from stock is that the stock bottle gradually becomes empty with an increasing airspace. Oxidation bites harder as the decreasing volume of stock ages.

When the level in the stock bottle lowers, then blew some DustOff in it, whose propelling gas is Propane (replacing CFK'S) which is heavier than air/oxygen and it will cover the developer and somewhat prevent oxidation.
 
OP
OP

MCB18

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2023
Messages
853
Location
Colorado
Format
Medium Format
Thinking about getting a couple of these containers for dev and fix. A bit more expensive than wine bags, but very durable and easy to clean. Anyone have experience with them? Anyone have any reason not to use them?

 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom