dcy
Subscriber
Hi everyone. Today was my first attempt at developing C-41. My negatives look fairly awful, and I don't know why. I am using the Kodak C-41 kit, and I don't know what to say except that I made an effort to follow the "Small Tank" instructions precisely.
See the photos below:
(1) The negatives on the left, already in their sleeves, are Kodak Gold shot with a point-and-shoot Pentax IQZoom 160, and developed by a lab. This is my reference point of what a negative should look like.
(2) The two negatives on the right, clearly just developed and hanging out to dry, are Kodak Color Plus (left) and Kodak Gold (right) shot with a Pentax 17 and the same Pentax IQZoom 160 as the reference roll. These negatives were developed together, in the same tank.
The fact that two rolls with different cameras look the same, and two rolls shot with the same camera look different, shows that the issue is not with the camera / exposure, but with the development. The negatives that I developed look wimpy. My guess is that they are underdeveloped. I used a sous vide to set the temperature. I set the sous vide to a temperature of 39°C in a water tank that also had the bottles with the developer, bleach, fixer, final rinse, and the Patterson tank filled with water. I left everything in there for maybe 2 - 3 hours while I did some errands and had dinner. When I came back, I measured the temperature inside the bottle of bleach to 38.5°C. The development time was 3:15, and I think I followed the agitation protocol in the instructions precisely --- 30s initial agitation, then 2s agitation every 15s.
I dunno... I think they look underdeveloped. What do you think I did wrong?
See the photos below:
(1) The negatives on the left, already in their sleeves, are Kodak Gold shot with a point-and-shoot Pentax IQZoom 160, and developed by a lab. This is my reference point of what a negative should look like.
(2) The two negatives on the right, clearly just developed and hanging out to dry, are Kodak Color Plus (left) and Kodak Gold (right) shot with a Pentax 17 and the same Pentax IQZoom 160 as the reference roll. These negatives were developed together, in the same tank.
The fact that two rolls with different cameras look the same, and two rolls shot with the same camera look different, shows that the issue is not with the camera / exposure, but with the development. The negatives that I developed look wimpy. My guess is that they are underdeveloped. I used a sous vide to set the temperature. I set the sous vide to a temperature of 39°C in a water tank that also had the bottles with the developer, bleach, fixer, final rinse, and the Patterson tank filled with water. I left everything in there for maybe 2 - 3 hours while I did some errands and had dinner. When I came back, I measured the temperature inside the bottle of bleach to 38.5°C. The development time was 3:15, and I think I followed the agitation protocol in the instructions precisely --- 30s initial agitation, then 2s agitation every 15s.
I dunno... I think they look underdeveloped. What do you think I did wrong?
Last edited: