Help. What's wrong with my negatives?

Abandoned Well

A
Abandoned Well

  • 2
  • 0
  • 340
f/art

D
f/art

  • 0
  • 0
  • 415
{void}

D
{void}

  • 1
  • 0
  • 413

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,994
Messages
2,800,136
Members
100,098
Latest member
ArgoShots
Recent bookmarks
0

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
866
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Hi everyone. Today was my first attempt at developing C-41. My negatives look fairly awful, and I don't know why. I am using the Kodak C-41 kit, and I don't know what to say except that I made an effort to follow the "Small Tank" instructions precisely.


See the photos below:

(1) The negatives on the left, already in their sleeves, are Kodak Gold shot with a point-and-shoot Pentax IQZoom 160, and developed by a lab. This is my reference point of what a negative should look like.

(2) The two negatives on the right, clearly just developed and hanging out to dry, are Kodak Color Plus (left) and Kodak Gold (right) shot with a Pentax 17 and the same Pentax IQZoom 160 as the reference roll. These negatives were developed together, in the same tank.


The fact that two rolls with different cameras look the same, and two rolls shot with the same camera look different, shows that the issue is not with the camera / exposure, but with the development. The negatives that I developed look wimpy. My guess is that they are underdeveloped. I used a sous vide to set the temperature. I set the sous vide to a temperature of 39°C in a water tank that also had the bottles with the developer, bleach, fixer, final rinse, and the Patterson tank filled with water. I left everything in there for maybe 2 - 3 hours while I did some errands and had dinner. When I came back, I measured the temperature inside the bottle of bleach to 38.5°C. The development time was 3:15, and I think I followed the agitation protocol in the instructions precisely --- 30s initial agitation, then 2s agitation every 15s.

I dunno... I think they look underdeveloped. What do you think I did wrong?

Color-Negatives-1.jpg

Color-Negatives-2.jpg
 
Last edited:

Don_ih

Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
8,084
Location
Ontario
Format
35mm RF
Do they also perhaps look to have a bit more overall fog?

Next time, try extending your development to 3:45?
 

loccdor

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
1,832
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
They do look underdeveloped but I would not expect being 0.5C low on the temperature to have such a big impact. Although I would have given at least an extra 15 sec to compensate.

I was looking to see if you poured the developer into a cold tank but it seems you were heating the tank to temp. Did you measure only the bleach bottle temperature? Maybe your developer temperature was lower than your reading for the bleach. That is the most important chemical to measure here.

Another avenue is that the chemicals might be slightly more dilute than recommended. Was anything spilled in the mixing?

For next time, err slightly on the side of too hot or too long, likely that will fix things up.
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
866
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
They do look underdeveloped but I would not expect being 0.5C low on the temperature to have such a big impact. Although I would have given at least an extra 15 sec to compensate.

The instructions give a range of 37°C - 39°C. I set the sous vide to 39°C because I expected that there would be some loss.


I was looking to see if you poured the developer into a cold tank but it seems you were heating the tank to temp. Did you measure only the bleach bottle temperature? Maybe your developer temperature was lower than your reading for the bleach. That is the most important chemical to measure here.

Yeah, I only measured the bleach. That's because the bleach was the last component I prepared so I figured it'd be the last one to reach temp. But you're right. I should've checked the developer. That's the one that matters.

You said that 0.5°C is enough difference that you would've given it an extra 15s. I can think of one thing probably did wrong that could produce a ~ 1°C difference: At the beginning of the process, for the first minute or so, I didn't think to put the Patterson tank back in the hot water. So the tank might have cooled a bit.


Another avenue is that the chemicals might be slightly more dilute than recommended. Was anything spilled in the mixing?

Nothing was spilled during mixing.

For next time, err slightly on the side of too hot or too long, likely that will fix things up.

Thanks! Both you and @Don_ih are giving me the same advice, so that's what I'll do. Next time I will develop for 3:45 like @Don_ih said and see how it goes.
 

loccdor

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
1,832
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I don't use a sous-vide, but rather a stoppered sink. One thing I do when heating the chems is aim for the sink/tub to be 1-2 degrees hotter than the desired temp of the chems. Because as they approach temp, the temp changes more slowly (mathematical asymptote sort of thing).

So you didn't spill the chemicals, good, how sure are you about the actual volume contained in your bottles? May be slightly different from manufacturer's statement or they could be expecting you to not fill it up to the cap.

I think the instructions for 37-39 should really be a hard 39 degrees based on other C-41 kits I've used. That big temperature range is going to have an impact on results if time is not adjusted.
 

gbroadbridge

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 18, 2004
Messages
634
Location
Sydney, Australia
Format
Medium Format
Did you use distilled/Deionised water?

Are you certain you have not contaminated the developer?
I always mix dev first to avoid any possibility of contamination by bleach/fixer.
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
866
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Replying slightly out of order...

I don't use a sous-vide, but rather a stoppered sink. One thing I do when heating the chems is aim for the sink/tub to be 1-2 degrees hotter than the desired temp of the chems. Because as they approach temp, the temp changes more slowly (mathematical asymptote sort of thing).
...
I think the instructions for 37-39 should really be a hard 39 degrees based on other C-41 kits I've used. That big temperature range is going to have an impact on results if time is not adjusted.

Hmm... In that case, next time I will set the sous vide to 40 degrees.


So you didn't spill the chemicals, good, how sure are you about the actual volume contained in your bottles? May be slightly different from manufacturer's statement or they could be expecting you to not fill it up to the cap.

The package doesn't come with bottles for the working solution; you have to supply those. I used breakers and graduated cylinders to measure the volumes and I made a very conscious effort to be precise with the volumes.

One thing I did that strictly did not follow the instructions is that I poured the concentrates into the beaker first, and then added water to volume. I can't imagine that that would matter, but I wanted to put that out there in case it does matter.


Did you use distilled/Deionised water?

Distilled water.


Are you certain you have not contaminated the developer?
I always mix dev first to avoid any possibility of contamination by bleach/fixer.

This is another place where it is possible I screwed up. I mindlessly mixed the fixer first. But I did realize that that was a potential problem, so I made a conscious effort to rinse the beakers and the graduated cylinders with distilled water several times in an effort to remove every trace of the fixer.

While I'm on this topic, I thought that the color of the developer was odd when I was mixing it. As I poured part C into the A+B mix, the solution quickly turned milk white. It felt like pouring milk in coffee. As I stirred, the solution became clearer, but developed some weird blotches, similar to drops of oil floating on water. I used a magnetic stirrer to do the mixing, and after a little while the entire solution turned clear, with no blotches. Just a very slight brownish tint, like very diluted tea.

No idea if anything I just said is relevant.
 

Samu

Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2023
Messages
206
Location
Lithuania
Format
35mm
They do look underdeveloped but I would not expect being 0.5C low on the temperature to have such a big impact. Although I would have given at least an extra 15 sec to compensate.

I was looking to see if you poured the developer into a cold tank but it seems you were heating the tank to temp. Did you measure only the bleach bottle temperature? Maybe your developer temperature was lower than your reading for the bleach. That is the most important chemical to measure here.

Another avenue is that the chemicals might be slightly more dilute than recommended. Was anything spilled in the mixing?

For next time, err slightly on the side of too hot or too long, likely that will fix things up.

0.5 degrees makes no practical difference. Officially, the temperature should be 37.8°C +-´0.3°, but the process will tolerate more deviation. Those negatives are seriously underdeveloped. Unfortunately the picture is not in focus, so I can´t see the edge markings.

My guess is a problem with mixing the developer. Wrong concentration, contamination, etc. The temperature would need to be totally wrong in order to produce results like you show. Something like trying to develop C-41 in 20°C. Also, chemistry must be something like 20% too weak to make a difference like that. Was the developer the color it should be ´- light yellow? If totally oxidized, the developer for C-41 will turn black.
 
Last edited:

brbo

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
2,249
Location
EU
Format
Multi Format
There is no way to be so far out of the target temperature or developing time window to get such results. It also doesn't look like this is a case of insufficient bleaching and/or fixing (you could still repeat those steps just to be sure), so I think it's your developer.

I hope somebody will have an explanation what could go wrong if you first mix part A, B and C together without water. Every instruction manual for every developer that came in separate parts has always been quite clear that you start with water and then add A, B and C in this order and always after thoroughly mixing in the previous part.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
7,001
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
I hope I still have my C41 book from over 40 years ago when I used it to troubleshoot the C41 processor from Noritsu.
 

loccdor

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 12, 2024
Messages
1,832
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Yes, it does sound reasonable that something could be wrong with the developer. With regard to rinsing the fixer out, Ilford method recommends 7 rinses. Maybe it could be that contaminating it.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,128
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I would use a nice photo thermometer to confirm temperature of sous vide. Negatives definitely look under developed. The factory edge markings are faint (and the Pentax 17 is working fine!!!)
 

Klaus Mähring

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
47
Location
Austria
Format
4x5 Format
While I'm on this topic, I thought that the color of the developer was odd when I was mixing it. As I poured part C into the A+B mix, the solution quickly turned milk white.

That does not sound good.... I've never encountered milky developer, even during mixing.

I poured the concentrates into the beaker first,

As long as you didn't mix the different parts before adding water, that shouldn't matter.

The negs are definately underdeveloped, you can see it looking at the small print on the side of the film. On your reference films that printings look much stronger.
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
866
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
0.5 degrees makes no practical difference. Officially, the temperature should be 37.8°C +-´0.3°, but the process will tolerate more deviation. Those negatives are seriously underdeveloped. Unfortunately the picture is not in focus, so I can´t see the edge markings.

Here are the edge markings. I'm not sure what to look for, except the fact that I see them.

Pentax_17_Edge_Markings.jpg

Pentax_IQZoom_Edge_Markings.jpg



Was the developer the color it should be ´- light yellow? If totally oxidized, the developer for C-41 will turn black.

The fresh developer from one of the unused bottles looks very light yellow. The one that I used now has a darker tint. I noticed that after the pre-soak step, when I dumped the water, it came out green. My understanding is that this is normal, but I didn't think to do more rinses, so the color of the used developer could include a little bit of whatever it is that made the pre-soak water green.

Fresh developer:
Fresh_Developer.jpg


Used developer:
Used_Developer.jpg
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
866
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
As long as you didn't mix the different parts before adding water, that shouldn't matter.

I did mix the different parts before adding water. I took a beaker, poured part A, then B, then C, then water. Do you think that's where I went wrong? I'll be sad to hear that I ruined the entire kit, but it's better to know where I went wrong than to not know.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,775
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Can you share the mixing instructions you were working from?
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,128
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
Those instructions are not the same as how Kodak (Eastman) told you how to prepare. EKCo Spelled out to start with water, then add each part in order with stirring. Oh Boy.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,775
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Those instructions are not the same as how Kodak (Eastman) told you how to prepare. EKCo Spelled out to start with water, then add each part in order with stirring. Oh Boy.

In one part, they sort of say that - assuming you read left to right:
1759196147035.png
 
OP
OP
dcy

dcy

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2025
Messages
866
Location
New Mexico, USA
Format
35mm
Is there a growing consensus that mixing order is probably where I went wrong?

I think we can safely say that there was in implicit assumption that the mixing order would be:
  1. Add "most" of the water first.
  2. Add parts A, then B, then C.
  3. Add water to the final target volume.
This is how we normally mix chemicals and you can see it depicted pictorially in the bottle:

Developer_Bottle.jpg


I did not do it this way because I do not have a 2.5L beaker. My largest is 1L. Now, I could buy a 3L beaker and be done with it. At the time I thought I could get away with a clever use of my 1L and 500 mL beakers:
  1. First, I mixed A+B+C and water to 1L in the 1L beaker.
  2. Then I extracted portions to move to the 500 mL beaker to bring to full dilution and store away.
At the time I did not think that adding water last would be an issue. I could have added 500 mL of water first, then A+B+C, then water to the 1L mark.

Next time I could try that... or I could just buy a 3L beaker.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
15,128
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
No reason to let the marketing folks try to over simplify things. No real reason to use "Genuine" Kodak chemistry either. Not with ambiguous instructions. You need to start with 80-90% of the required water with some held back. Measure each addition carefully, rinse the graduate with a tiny bit of water, add this to the mix. Repeat for each, then dilute to the end volume, mixing along the way.

This makes a case for a quality blix kit like Adox. I have enough Flexicolor chemistry to float a boat. Still.

Frustrating.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom