Sounds like you're already on to a solid plan. Post some pictures once you get going and all the best with your new setup.
Best regards,
AlanH
Thank you all for the quick replies and help! I have registered at the other forum aswel! I mailed a few times back and forth with Omer from catlabs. And he is giving me a price for a complete package of a Rajah (deardorff copy) with a rodenstock Sironar 360mm F6.8, in black copal #3 + 2 regular holders + 1 polaroid holder + polaroid processor and tray. I think i will be very happy with this camera and lens. The 180mm was one of my favorite lenses on 4x5. I believe this lens has good image circle coverage as well. What do you think? Sounds good for me?
Haha... Kindred spirits?
Sorry, my wife's name is Anne, I did drive a Jeep many, many years ago, and I've never been to St. Louis.Only sports I've ever really been interested in are those I play myself--mostly tennis.
Best regards,
AlanH
Thank you all for the quick replies and help! I have registered at the other forum aswel! I mailed a few times back and forth with Omer from catlabs. And he is giving me a price for a complete package of a Rajah (deardorff copy) with a rodenstock Sironar 360mm F6.8, in black copal #3 + 2 regular holders + 1 polaroid holder + polaroid processor and tray. I think i will be very happy with this camera and lens. The 180mm was one of my favorite lenses on 4x5. I believe this lens has good image circle coverage as well. What do you think? Sounds good for me?
I'm getting a bit curious as to why 8X10 is so much more difficult than 4x5. I get that the camera is really big of course, but isn't the loading of film etc very similar?
I'm getting a bit curious as to why 8X10 is so much more difficult than 4x5. I get that the camera is really big of course, but isn't the loading of film etc very similar?
Thank you all for the quick replies and help! I have registered at the other forum aswel! I mailed a few times back and forth with Omer from catlabs. And he is giving me a price for a complete package of a Rajah (deardorff copy) with a rodenstock Sironar 360mm F6.8, in black copal #3 + 2 regular holders + 1 polaroid holder + polaroid processor and tray. I think i will be very happy with this camera and lens. The 180mm was one of my favorite lenses on 4x5. I believe this lens has good image circle coverage as well. What do you think? Sounds good for me?
I'm getting a bit curious as to why 8X10 is so much more difficult than 4x5. I get that the camera is really big of course, but isn't the loading of film etc very similar?
My setbacks were circumstantial. The camera was damaged in shipping, and the Polaroid processor needed a replacement part. Due diligence is in order when buying second-hand. You'll want to research the processors and holders if you're looking to buy things piecemeal. Try to find a complete system if you can. And plan on throwing away a few sheets of film just working with the holders and the processor. This frustrates a lot of people, it seems. And then a few more sheets trying to nail the exposure. The Impossible 8x10 material is contrasty and unforgiving when it comes to exposure. Add a good light meter to your shopping list. And a prayer book.Please do tell me about your mistakes so I can try and skip those! Aswel as your learning curve! I am both scared and excited about shooting 8x10, i think thats natural. Ofcourse I am a little afraid of messing up the first few expensive polaroids. I did not plan on practicing a year.
After all that has happend are you still satisfied with the purchase of your camera and lens? I thought that if I would invest between the 1000 and 2000 euro's on a camera and lens I would get some solid quality for it.
The polaroid processors and polaroid holders are still very expensive at least on e-bay and i am not quite sure where else to find them. I was also wondering about the polaroids processor, there a different types. Does this matter? Do they all process the current 8x10 polaroids from impossible project? Is there a significant difference between them?
And out of curiosity do you have a few examples of your 8x10 polaroids? Are you satisfied with the 8x10 polaroids? They recently released a second version have you tried those out already?
you might keep your eye open for a szabad 18x24 which i believe will work with
8x10 holders ( i hear they are interchangable but might be wrong )
szabad made lots of these camers in the 50-60s they are built beautifully
and were sought after by every pro shooter and his/her brother/sister in scandinavia
when they were in full production. i have the 8x10 version and love it!
while alan tells it like it is, that 8x10 is harder than 4x5 ... it really isnt that much harder
DOF is tricky and it can be a heavy and slow job setting up .. but if you have done well
with 4x5 you will probably not even notice the difficulties encountered with 8x10 ..
good luck ( have fun!)
john
Whatever you buy, you will probably want to change at some point. Don't spend a fortune on your first camera for that reason. The 360 Sironar N is a great lens, only BIG. I have a 14" Gold Dot Dagor which is the same focal length only a lot smaller. I also have a 300 Sironar N which although the heaviest lens I own, will be small compared to the 360. If you can find a 12 Dagor in good shape in a good shutter, it may be worthwhile looking into it. L
My setbacks were circumstantial. The camera was damaged in shipping, and the Polaroid processor needed a replacement part. Due diligence is in order when buying second-hand. You'll want to research the processors and holders if you're looking to buy things piecemeal. Try to find a complete system if you can. And plan on throwing away a few sheets of film just working with the holders and the processor. This frustrates a lot of people, it seems. And then a few more sheets trying to nail the exposure. The Impossible 8x10 material is contrasty and unforgiving when it comes to exposure. Add a good light meter to your shopping list. And a prayer book.
I just posted one of my Impossible 8x10 portraits to the gallery, but if you're not a subscriber here, you won't be able to view it. I added it below. The young lady here moved, so the composition and focus are a bit off. I still like it though. This is with the new v2.0 Beta film.
I'm getting a bit curious as to why 8X10 is so much more difficult than 4x5. I get that the camera is really big of course, but isn't the loading of film etc very similar?
That looks simply ...AWESOME! The new 8x10 polaroid looks solid! Yes the whole polaroid holder and processor thing is still a bit confusing to me but luckily I am currently looking at buying everything in one place, also to save on shipping costs. I already have a good light meter! But the thing that bums me out a little bit is that i can not process my polaroids on location, it must have electricity and doesn't have a manual crank. I can see right away if my exposure is right and also of course if i took a great picture or not. But after i shot the polaroid I can safely take it out and save it for a few hours and then process it at home right?
I don't expect to be wasting lots of film with the exposure but I was indeed afraid that the processing might be something new for me to learn and could be difficult to get the hang of. Then again people also said developing was difficult but imo it is also hard to mess up. I think i will try to shoot a few negatives first before i use the expensive polaroids just to make sure. Or maybe use some paper. But yes I do expect to mess up a few things and films at the start and also later on because of fatigue or excitement, it always happens, it is inevitable. But sometimes these mistakes turn out great!
Yes I've read and seen that its big and heavy, but isn't that also a quick indication of quality? Sort of like the main rule in photography with camera's (maybe DSLR rule?) ? And because it is so big it also has a good image circle coverage right? Or does the gold dot dagor also have great image circle coverage? Because that is something I need aswel because I am going to tilt and shift the camera. I figured i would aim for somewhere in between cheap and expensive, to avoid buying a camera i will regret buying and because i can not afford a expensive 8x10 camera haha.
I'm getting a bit curious as to why 8X10 is so much more difficult than 4x5. I get that the camera is really big of course, but isn't the loading of film etc very similar?
One thing that is easier with 8x10 over 4x5. With that big ground glass it is easier to see what you are doing.
I've got a bad back and I really notice the difference in bulk and weight. Everything is bigger and heavier from the camera to lenses, film holders, tripod, etc. I wheel my camera around in a wheeled tool bag and don't get too far from my vehicle. Shooting 4x5 would be easier on me but I just like the 8x10 better. What did Ansel say? Something about carrying the largest camera you can.Eventually in his old age he shot a Hasselblad out of necessity.
Totally agree! That big ground glass is like viewing a TV screen!!OK, really dating myself here...TV screens back when they were a LOT smaller than they are now.
Brett Weston used to say that anything more than 100 feet from the car was not worth shooting. Of course, I believe around the time he said that he was shooting a lot of 11x14. I still backpack my 8x10 outfit, but not nearly as far as I used to!
Best regards,
AlanH
Last fall the St. Louis Art Museum had a Brett Weston show. I took my wife and daughter and we all three really enjoyed it. There is nothing like viewing actual prints!
P.S. I remember watching tv on a 12" black and white set and arguing whose turn it was to get up and change the channel!
I remember a business trip I took (mid-70's) to Atlanta, GA where I visited a gallery that sold Brett Weston's work. I held in my hot paws an exquisite copy of his Mendenhall Glacier image and it was, I felt, priced reasonably. Like a fool I didn't buy it! I'll spare ya the story of how I also didn't buy a 16x20 copy of Ansel's Moonrise at a ridiculously low price a few years before passing on the Weston print!
But, in later years I made up for it a bit. I have John Sexton, Alan Ross, John Wimberley, and others hanging on the walls of my home where I enjoy them daily.
P.S. Man, 12" B&W? No remote control? You must be about as old as I am!!
Best regards,
AlanH
I'm a little younger (no business trips in the 1970's for me). I graduated high school in 1980. My dad was really cheap when it came to television sets.I remember buying a 19" RCA color tv in 79 or 80 with money I made from a part time job. My little brother and sister used to hang out in my room in the basement to watch it. Now I have a 58" Plasma with surround sound and remote. How things have changed!
Your collection of prints sound much more interesting than television though. I'm envious!
Alan
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?