I really think that this is one case where a digital approach is the way to go, or at the very least, to try first. I wouldn't do anything which could damage valuable original material like your transparencies, and I've never heard of any chemical method of "reducing" colour transparencies (unlike B&W negs, where good-old Farmers Reducer used to be on every darkroom shelf ! ). Any kind of "bleaching" would probably also be irreversable.
The transparencies could be scanned very simply, and something like Photoshop or Gimp might allow the shadow detail and contrast to be manipulated to recover what you hope for.
Even if you have a supply of any of the discontinued papers and chemicals for printing from transparencies, a darkroom approach seems a longer and more complicated way round on this occasion.
This is APUG, we always choose the longer and more complicate rout because it's traditional analog methods that we enjoy... That's the theme here.
I'm just shocked so many are suggesting digital when this guy obviously knows his stuff and had the experience to do it the analogue way, he is just asking which chemical will substitute for cyanide...
The gentleman didn't ask "which chemical will substitute for cyanide", he asked for "possible alternative solutions". A digital approach might be a possible alternative "solution" to consider????? He didn't say it had to be an analog methos.
Why do you knock other contributors when they are taking time to try to help the guy?
(Oh, and thanks for explaining that this really is APUG and that analog is the theme here. Perhaps it would have taken me another 6 years and 1600 posts to grasp this if you hadn't pointed it out to me.)
The gentleman didn't ask "which chemical will substitute for cyanide", he asked for "possible alternative solutions". A digital approach might be a possible alternative "solution" to consider????? He didn't say it had to be an analog methos.
Actually he did. "An alternative to cyanide"
Why do you knock other contributors when they are taking time to try to help the guy?
No knocking, just suggesting it's APUG, not DPUG.
(Oh, and thanks for explaining that this really is APUG and that analog is the theme here. Perhaps it would have taken me another 6 years and 1600 posts to grasp this if you hadn't pointed it out to me.
Maybe.
)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?