Help identifying and valuing an original Nikon f with a trigger (leicavit) winder!

Tyndall Bruce

A
Tyndall Bruce

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
TEXTURES

A
TEXTURES

  • 4
  • 0
  • 56
Small Craft Club

A
Small Craft Club

  • 2
  • 0
  • 52
RED FILTER

A
RED FILTER

  • 1
  • 0
  • 45
The Small Craft Club

A
The Small Craft Club

  • 3
  • 0
  • 52

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,903
Messages
2,782,790
Members
99,743
Latest member
HypnoRospo
Recent bookmarks
0

Gram Nylén

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Messages
318
Location
92612
Format
35mm
Hello, I recently purchased this original Nikon f with a trigger winder (it was a fine price and piqued my interest). I can't find any documentation on the internet of such a camera let alone what such a thing might be worth and I was really hoping one of you experienced Nikon folk might be able to shed some light as to what I just purchased:

1669448909378.png


1669448921040.png

1669448930989.png
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,548
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
If you just bought it how much was it? If you own it, can you tell us about it. How does it handle. How fast can it fire the shutter? Was it a worthwhile purchase? Should others try to find one too?
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,266
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
It may well be a prototype. I remember seeing a 10x8 Thornton Tourist camera at a Camera Fair 3 or 4 years ago, it had an 8" wide roll film back, the lens board was missing, but they were round and tool 2 or 3 lenses, and you rotated the board to select the lens. The camera was made before Pickard joined and invested in the company. I have two unusual Thornton Pickard shutters that there's no mention of in literature, both came from close to where the company was located.

Prototypes were made and given to photographers to test, it's not unusual, but it is pot luck finding them as they are rare. In this case it's likely the winder never went into production. Remember that prior to the Nikon F the professional system camera with motor drives was the KW Praktina, and a choice of spring or electric motor drives and a bulk film back, also a huge choice of lenses from multiple manufacturers.

I'd do some digging around, it may well be worth a lot more than you paid for it.

Ian
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
That's very interesting, I've only seen those on rangefinder cameras. Usually on Leica's, but not always. I'm wondering why they didn't just put a motorized winder on it, especially on a big 'ol Nikon F camera. Whatever you do, don't sell it, it may be worth a pretty penny to someone. The Nikon spelling and the F on the front looks as if it was a genuine Nikon accessory. Then there's that serial number on it, which must mean something, but I have serious doubts they made 130,715 of those things.

My guess is that someone used an aftermarket winder and put the writing on it from a Nikon camera, or it's a genuine Nikon prototype. If it's the latter it could be worth a mint
 
Last edited:

Mike Lopez

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
643
Format
Multi Format
Hello, I recently purchased this original Nikon f with a trigger winder (it was a fine price and piqued my interest). I can't find any documentation on the internet of such a camera let alone what such a thing might be worth and I was really hoping one of you experienced Nikon folk might be able to shed some light as to what I just purchased:

View attachment 322701

View attachment 322702
View attachment 322703
I’m out of the country at the moment, but when I get home in a week I’d be happy to see if this shows up in my copy of the Nikon compendium. Although I bet there are others here who might have a copy and could get back to you before I could.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
One thing to note is that while the lettering is in the Nikon style, it isn't embossed, just painted on. On the very far top left of the piece that is on the back, it looks like I can see the pebbled covering peeking though, which is odd. On the other side of that piece, you can see where someone has brushed black paint on it, for what purpose I don't know.

The longer I look at the pics, the more I think (guess) it is a Leicavit that someone managed to adapt to the camera.
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,371
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
One thing to note is that while the lettering is in the Nikon style, it isn't embossed, just painted on. On the very far top left of the piece that is on the back, it looks like I can see the pebbled covering peeking though, which is odd. On the other side of that piece, you can see where someone has brushed black paint on it, for what purpose I don't know.

The longer I look at the pics, the more I think (guess) it is a Leicavit that someone managed to adapt to the camera.

A Leicavit is rounded not angular at the ends...i'd bet it's some kind of prototype
 

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,530
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
One thing to note is that while the lettering is in the Nikon style, it isn't embossed, just painted on. On the very far top left of the piece that is on the back, it looks like I can see the pebbled covering peeking though, which is odd. On the other side of that piece, you can see where someone has brushed black paint on it, for what purpose I don't know.

The longer I look at the pics, the more I think (guess) it is a Leicavit that someone managed to adapt to the camera.

Would you like to point to these areas using arrows and the original photographs? How you can see the serial number is painted on and not embossed I don't know but it may be. However the general shape and layout follows a 'standard' F-36 motor wind base except for all the mechanical alterations. The idea it is a Leicavit integrated into an F motor winder base and given a fake serial number is absurd, if it is all real it must all be Nikon.
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,410
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
The housing is very similar to the motor drive part of the F36 motor for the Nikon F: https://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/michaeliu/cameras/nikonf/fmotors/index.htm
without the battery grip part. The motor drive housing has obviously been modified to have the cutout on the left for the locking lever, and it doesn't have the motor dials on the back of the motor, information panel on the back, and so on. The housing seems like a genuine Nikon part, the modifications would have to be either Nikon factory or extremely skillful aftermarket.
 

Mackinaw

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
705
Location
One hour sou
Format
Multi Format
A Japanese company name Mikami made rapid-winders for a Nikon F. This may be one of theirs.

Jim B.
 
OP
OP
Gram Nylén

Gram Nylén

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Messages
318
Location
92612
Format
35mm
The housing is very similar to the motor drive part of the F36 motor for the Nikon F: https://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/michaeliu/cameras/nikonf/fmotors/index.htm
without the battery grip part. The motor drive housing has obviously been modified to have the cutout on the left for the locking lever, and it doesn't have the motor dials on the back of the motor, information panel on the back, and so on. The housing seems like a genuine Nikon part, the modifications would have to be either Nikon factory or extremely skillful aftermarket.

this was my friend's theory as well. This seems most likely as of right now.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,667
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
OP
OP
Gram Nylén

Gram Nylén

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 6, 2022
Messages
318
Location
92612
Format
35mm

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,530
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
It may or may not be worth noting the serial number is consistent with Nikon F-36 motor drives for 1967/68, so perhaps classed in the same group of 'film advance devices' by Nikon even though mechanical. The earliest date for that style of prism finder is also 1968 but of course everything could be coincidence.
 

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
Did Nikon make a rapid finder for the Nikon S2? Or could it have been a prototype made before Nikon gave up on RF cameras? I can’t measure now, but isn’t the footprint of the original F the same as the S2? Either way, a Nikon collector will lust for this.
I would check with one of the prestigious auction houses that operate special camera auctions. As those with GAS on this site will tell you, there is no rational explanation. However, collectors due preserve the past.
.
 

250swb

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2012
Messages
1,530
Location
Peak District
Format
Multi Format
Did Nikon make a rapid finder for the Nikon S2? Or could it have been a prototype made before Nikon gave up on RF cameras? I can’t measure now, but isn’t the footprint of the original F the same as the S2?
.

A simple Google search shows at least one person did make a Rapidwinder for the SP, but it's architecture is entirely different from the OP's.

https://www.cameraquest.com/nikon_sp_rapidwinder.htm
 

4season

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
1,986
Format
Plastic Cameras
I wonder if it could have been a custom creation by someone like Marty Forscher, built upon an existing F36 housing.
 

reddesert

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,410
Location
SAZ
Format
Hybrid
Did Nikon make a rapid finder for the Nikon S2? Or could it have been a prototype made before Nikon gave up on RF cameras? I can’t measure now, but isn’t the footprint of the original F the same as the S2? Either way, a Nikon collector will lust for this.
I would check with one of the prestigious auction houses that operate special camera auctions. As those with GAS on this site will tell you, there is no rational explanation. However, collectors due preserve the past.
.

Unfortunately, it is an internet myth that the Nikon F is built on the body casting of an S or S2. They have stylistic similarities, but the bodies are different widths. This came up a while ago when someone wondered if the backs were interchangeable. From camera spec sheets the F is about 146mm wide while the S and S2 are about 135mm and 136mm wide (S and S2 may be the same size with differences due to measurement method). I personally compared an F and S and verified the F is significantly wider. Also, the tripod socket is in a different place, and there are other small differences.

The Tom Abrahamsson rapidwinder for the SP mentioned by 250swb is a much later item, from the 2000s.

There's a whole Nikon Historical Society devoted to Nikons, artifacts, and trivia, they and/or the suggestion of collectors/dealers would surely like to see this - perhaps Stephen Gandy at Cameraquest, who has documented many oddities like the half-frame Nikon S3M with motor https://www.cameraquest.com/nrfs3m.htm
 

MarkS

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
503
Marty Forscher in NYC was a master at modifying cameras for the professional trade, and inventing new devices (like the Forscher ProBack for 35mm Polaroid). This winder might be one of his.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
That was my first thought. Oh, it must have come off a Nikon rangefinder body. But like reddesert mentioned, they're not really the same camera bodies. Doubtful the innards of the shutter release on the bottom would be the same even if the body size was similar.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom