Yes, farnky unexpected indeed for PoP to pay attention to something that isn't fancy enough today such as megapixels, flashy digi P&S...feels somewhat refreshing (albeit I ceased reading PoP few years back when they got feeded by digital solely and swamped by ads).
There are at least one mistake i the article though:
"50mm f/2 Summicron focusing to 0.7 meters, half stops, to f/22.) $1,600." should read f/16 (smallest aperture) not f/22, other two contenders indeed go down to f/22.