Personally I wouldn’t care that much about how a photo was taken. He might have taken it by pressing the shutter by mistake or he might have waited for a whole month for it to happen as he wanted.
But by him choosing it, he makes a statement, that this photo fits into his artistic vision and that is the most important thing for me, suddenly the photo becomes valuable as a window or piece to his oeuvre
there is also another thing:
50mm is the more discreet or neutral lens. It doesn’t overwhelm with its form. I have the feeling HCB preferred things simple, no contrast exaggeration or dark room manipulations and the choice of a 50mm supports this philosophy
Perhaps it is also due to the perspective a ‘normal’ focal length lens provides the viewer. The lens and the viewers’ eyes are processing the visual data with a common perspective.
Our stereoscopic vision fails and the world is 2D in appearance beyond 60 feet from our eyes, so beyond 60 feet we depend on how big something looks to determine its distance relative to our position (perspective). For example…We can get a good idea how fast a car is driving away from us by how quickly it gets small. But through binoculars something seems a little off…the car is taking forever to get small and the fellow with the 24mm lens on his Nikon lost sight of the car a while back.
So if other than a ‘normal’ lens is used, the relative size of objects in the scene will be different than experienced in our visual reality. Which in turn can be used to influence the viewer.
There are a couple of images in that YouTube video are not from HCB. For example these two photos I recognised being from other photographers:
1. Piergiorgio Branzi at 7:05
2. John Leonard at 7:13
Also the swinging girl at 01:53 I doubt is HCB. But I also have no clue who the photographer might be.
Apart from that many nice photos I never saw before thanks Clive!