Recently the long thread by vania on his problem with exposure lines using HC110 and the lengthy thread quite some time ago about 510 Pyro and James Lane
Who are you referring to in this comment?Is this the same person who was kicked out of basically every film photography film community on facebook at some point or another for picking petty fights with people about pretty much everything in order to advertise his business? If so, surprised this character is still around and getting attention.
James's stuff is even slightly better than mine in terms of manufacturing. Results are identical.
Just wanted to state that this guy is in no way related to me, nor does he make dry plates that I’m aware of.
(My father is, however, named James Lane but is much older, rougher, and lives in Arkansas.)
- Jason
Can I ask what it is about James's stuff that is better in terms of manufacturing if results are identical?
Thanks
pentaxuser
Thanks I will take your "trade secret" phrase in the humorous spirit in which I think it is offered. If I didn't take it that way then I'd have to conclude that like faberryman, you might be introducing a kind of "black magic" into the making of 510 when we all know that in photo chemistry or indeed in life there is no such thing as black magicAfraid I can't indulge you that far into the fine details. Trade secret. I could only make a remote analogy: same piece of beef, but you can fire-grill it, sous-vide it, or smoke-grill it and get different results depending on your setup & skill. Getting the right purity of TEA & virgin chemicals also makes a difference, not only on the visual but also the quality.
Shelf-life is about the same, we concur. I'm still using a 500ml bottle from my 1st batch (made 6 years ago). It has turned pitch-black and it's still going strong.
Thanks I will take your "trade secret" phrase in the humorous spirit in which I think it is offered. If I didn't take it that way then I'd have to conclude that like faberryman, you might be introducing a kind of "black magic" into the making of 510 when we all know that in photo chemistry or indeed in life there is no such thing as black magic
If yours is now pitch black but James's is always paler then frankly I see no advantage in paler 510 if there is no practical benefit
pentaxuser
Jay DeFehr has a 2018 video on YouTube showing how to mix up the four ingredients which comprise 510 Pyro. It looks straightforward to me. He is not standing on one foot or waving a magic wand. He says if the TEA is older the solution will darken. He is using a heated magnetic stirrer.
No
Well, as I said, it may not concern end-users that much. As commercial players, we're faced with problems of consistency when making it in larger scale. The color atests to the level of process design & control that the maker is willing to maintain.
Making some 200-500ml of pyro on a heated magnetic stirrer is piece of cake. I could easily make it even without 1. But stirring a 2L or 5L pot of syrupy liquid & getting consistency is a whole new problem. Perhaps it's easier to appreciate the effort to overcome challenges after one has tried
Agreed, in Jay’s video he’s not even waiting for the previous ingredient to dissolve before adding the others—and because it’s in TEA, he’s not worried to put the ascorbic acid first to make sure it’s there to preserve the other agents. Other than darker TEA, which Gainer also discussed, the only other way for the developer to darken is oxidation of the developing agents. Mixing the ascorbic acid first might change that very very slightly but can’t see it would matter much. I don’t know if the pH of TEA drifts with oxidation but other than oxidized developing agents, that would be the thing I think is most likely to impact performance over time. I’m sure someone here knows the answer to that question about TEA.
Yes you may well be right in the first sentence and thus if your stuff or my stuff made to Jay DeFehr's recipe or John Finch's ( essentially the same) or bought from Photographer's Formulary or James Lane's ZoneImaging do the same thing as they all seem to, then my only concern is price.
If your process or James Lane's has an edge then as a consumer it has to be demonstrable to me in terms of outcome for negatives
Anyone claiming that their developer, made to a known recipe, has a certainly "magic" in it, has to explain the magic and demonstrate its powers, otherwise it just sounds like "marketing speak"
I remember all the famous adverts from the 1950s( the great days of the Mad ( Madison Avenue) Men about certain combinations of washing machines and washing powder that were magic combinations that gave the specific combination the "edge"
Of course these magic combinatons involved a lot of independent research and the washing powder maker and washing machine maker had no links with each other
pentaxuser
If the only thing you appreciate is price, i'm not sure you're seeing the whole picture here.
No I fear that may be the case. It certainly was when I used to buy a washing powder that worked as it should and was the cheapest. After 99 years on this Earth I have sadly concluded that I may never appreciate that famous "magic touch" that is being sold
I think our conversation has now come to a practical end
pentaxuser
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?