HC-110 same as Ilfotec LC29 or not?

WPPD25 Self Portrait

A
WPPD25 Self Portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 21
Wife

A
Wife

  • 4
  • 1
  • 71
Dragon IV 10.jpg

A
Dragon IV 10.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 78
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

A
DRAGON IV 08.jpg

  • 1
  • 0
  • 46

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,880
Messages
2,766,326
Members
99,495
Latest member
Brenva1A
Recent bookmarks
0

Devlog

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
44
Location
Berlin
Format
Multi Format
Dear photographers,

I purchased a bottle of Ilfotec LC29 because I saw photos on the web with Neopan 400 at 1600 and LC29. My question: I already have an open bottle of HC-110 - and now I heard both developers have similar characteristics.

If this is the case, I could keep the bottle of LC29 closed and give it away again. But then again, I'm too curious and will try it in a few minutes.

Are both developers more or less the same?
 

Nuff

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
581
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Format
Multi Format
They are nearly identical, just LC29 is more diluted version of Ilfotec HC. Which has the same dilutions as HC110, but LC29 has different ones.
The times are identical.
 
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
316
Format
Multi Format
They are nearly identical, just LC29 is more diluted version of Ilfotec HC. Which has the same dilutions as HC110, but LC29 has different ones.
The times are identical.

Yeah, LC29 is the diluted version of ilford HC. Ilford HC is nearly identical to HC110.
 

nworth

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Messages
2,228
Location
Los Alamos,
Format
Multi Format
HC-110 is a proprietary formula, as is Ilford HC. Although Ilford HC has been engineered to be very similar to HC-110, it is doubtful that they are identical. Over the many years of its existence, most of the formulation of HC-110 has become more or less known to the industry, but the exact formulation is still a company secret. It is very doubtful that Ilford would release an exact copy and risk the legal implications.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
They are similar in some respects but are not identical even when considering the difference in the strength of the concentrates. One important difference IS the presence of water in the Ilford product. This shortens the shelf life of the Ilford concentrate. Oxidation requires the presence of water to occur. This is the reason why the HC-110 concentrate contains no water. The Kodak product has a VERY long shelf life. The Ilford product has a more conventional shelf life.

It is easy to determine whether two developers are the same or similar. Just compare the two MSDS's.
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
HC-110 is a proprietary formula, as is Ilford HC. Although Ilford HC has been engineered to be very similar to HC-110, it is doubtful that they are identical. Over the many years of its existence, most of the formulation of HC-110 has become more or less known to the industry, but the exact formulation is still a company secret. It is very doubtful that Ilford would release an exact copy and risk the legal implications.

If there is no patent, copying a competitor is completely legal.

HC110 is old enough to have had all patents expire.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
If there is no patent, copying a competitor is completely legal.

HC110 is old enough to have had all patents expire.

A formula cannot be patented. Only a new and novel use of a specific ingredient can be patented. Therefore the exact formulation of a developer like HC-110 or Ilfotech HC is a closely held trade secret. I believe that this distinction is made by most governments in their patent law.

Copying a developer like HC-110 requires special equipment and chemicals that are not readily available. In fact some of the ingredients were manufactured by Kodak because of their general lack of availability.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OP
OP
Devlog

Devlog

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
44
Location
Berlin
Format
Multi Format
Thank you very much

Your help is very much appreciated, thanks a bunch for all the responses - now I can see the differences more clearly.
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,309
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
of course these days both products are apparently made side by side by by the same large German contractor. who ironically is probably the only one to know the exact differences, and is not allowed to say.
 

Nuff

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2013
Messages
581
Location
Tokyo, Japan
Format
Multi Format
of course these days both products are apparently made side by side by by the same large German contractor. who ironically is probably the only one to know the exact differences, and is not allowed to say.

Do you mean Tetanal? They also have their own version of HC110.
 

WD4AON

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
53
Location
Florida/NY
Format
Sub 35mm
HC-110 is a proprietary formula, as is Ilford HC. Although Ilford HC has been engineered to be very similar to HC-110, it is doubtful that they are identical. Over the many years of its existence, most of the formulation of HC-110 has become more or less known to the industry, but the exact formulation is still a company secret. It is very doubtful that Ilford would release an exact copy and risk the legal implications.

What legal implications? Any patents have now expired. --Terry
 

WD4AON

Member
Joined
May 8, 2020
Messages
53
Location
Florida/NY
Format
Sub 35mm
A formula cannot be patented. Only a new and novel use of a specific ingredient can be patented. Therefore the exact formulation of a developer like HC-110 or Ilfotech HC is a closely held trade secret. I believe that this distinction is made by most governments in their patent law.

Copying a developer like HC-110 requires special equipment and chemicals that are not readily available. In fact some of the ingredients were manufactured by Kodak because of their general lack of availability.
While the 'formula' may not be patented, the PRODUCT produced according to the recipe is patentable, provided it is new, useful, and unobvious (US patent rules).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom