Another vote for a Rollei TLR if weight-reduction is a motivator. It's a beautiful camera that produces images with their own special magic. And there's something to be said for having a camera that has one and only one lens that keeps you from wasting time thinking about which lens you're using and makes you think more about how you're using it.
+1. How I wish I had been given this advice back in the 1980s when I suddenly had money to spend and went mad on cameras... I've owned a Rollei since 1966 but put it away in 1983 and started working thru the 35mm cameras - Nikkormat, Pentx, Leica (the biggest mistake I ever made), Linhof, Mamiya, German 6x6 and 6x9 folders and eventually, in a particular moment of madness, two entire Hasselblad kits. Almost all sold at a loss except the 'blads which gave me a modest profit when I offloaded them a few years ago. If I had to sell them now, in Australia anyway, I would probably lose money. So it goes.
I now shoot mostly digital but quite often the Nikkormats (worth nyet on the resale market, so I've kept them, also all my old Nikkors) and one of my four Rolleis get trotted out for a special shoot to be preserved on film for archival reasons. The results with the Rolleiflex and a recently acquired Rolleicord, always shame anything I can take on 35mm except for the interchangeable lens factor, but I've learned to live with this.
My Hasseblads were beautiful machines but buying extra lenses and all the other bits and pieces for it meant I paid out much more than I had intended. Am still selling off small pieces one by one, always at a loss (I bought into this system when prices in Australia were at their highest level). I also never felt comfortable with my 500CM out in the field, unless on a tripod. The ergonomics were lovely to handle but to shoot, for me, no go.
Nowadays I use my Rolleicord Vb with a pocketful of accessories (lens hood, a few filters, a 16 exposure and a 24 exposure kit and every now and then when I need it for critical shooting, the Rollei prism) and find the results are quite unique, a 'Xenar' look I've not been able to achieve even with a Zeiss Planar.
The message here? Hasselblads are wonderful, but there is always an alternative when one is on a budget. As a 71 year old pensioner, I now find my Vb much lighter to carry around with me and I shoot much less 120 film with the 16 exposure kit. As I've already said, the images speak for themselves.