Hasselblad Macro question

Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 0
  • 0
  • 30
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 2
  • 0
  • 28
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 1
  • 2
  • 49
Tōrō

H
Tōrō

  • 4
  • 0
  • 46

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,826
Messages
2,781,512
Members
99,718
Latest member
nesunoio
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
1,685
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
What is the practical difference between these two macro lenses? I have all of the black series lenses in 50mm, 80mm, and 150mm. I'd like to add the 120mm and am wondering what, if any real difference there is between these two. Older one goes for $300 and the newer is almost $700. Thanks for your input.

225293-2107294_07.jpg 225298-2505893_02.jpg
 

BrianShaw

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2005
Messages
16,526
Location
La-la-land
Format
Multi Format
No practical difference that I could ever discern.

The price diff is refective of the diff in age and likelihood of need for an overhaul before being reliable for use.

They have different shutters and a few other nonpractical differences.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,364
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The 135mm lens with variable focus tube is the only combination that will provide a 1:1 photograph.
 

mshchem

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
14,656
Location
Iowa City, Iowa USA
Format
Medium Format
I have the urge to buy stuff. I have the nice black one. Do I use it much? No. A short extension tube on a telephoto is the easiest way forward.
 

etn

Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Messages
1,113
Location
Munich, Germany
Format
Medium Format
Well, not much difference apart from the extra stop and the obvious C vs CF difference, of which you are surely aware (if not, please see here https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/hasselblad-c-t-vs-cf-or-cfi.134879/ - there is also a lot more resource on various places on the internet about this).

You can compare the specs here:
http://www.hasselbladhistorical.eu/pdf/lds/C120.pdf
http://www.hasselbladhistorical.eu/pdf/lds/CF120.pdf

The CF can focus somewhat closer without extension rings, 0.8m vs 0.95m... does that make a difference in practical use??

EDIT: most C lenses have B50 filters. The CF has a B60. So if you have other CF lenses, it might be good to go for the CF and use only 1 size filters.
 
Last edited:

GLS

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
1,726
Location
England
Format
Multi Format
The two lenses are not of the same optical design. The 120 S-Planar is one stop slower, and will not focus as closely. It also flares more from what I have read (older coatings).
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom