Something smells fishy to me. I could imagine having to shim a screen to get proper focus as a way for the manufacturer to accommodate tolerances, but it's crazy to think Hasselblad intend for parts to be sanded down.
Is there any chance your earlier screen was mounted upside down in camera? It would certainly throw focus off at film plane. You now, it's supposed to be frosted side down towards mirror.
Sounds weird. All screens for the V-System can be used on this body regardless whether digital or not, because film backs and digital backs have the same flange distance. Unless you really mounted the screen upside down (which is something I assume the repairman should have noticed immediately), I could also imagine that the mirror was out of adjustment (also a point the repairman should have checked first), or your body had been dropped by the previous owner. I read it several times that dropping a Hasselblad body, even when leaving no visible outer signs, may get the body out of calibration.
To my personal experience, there are two reasons why a Hasselblad isn't focussing correctly, wether it is with a film cassis or a digital back.
First is putting the focussing screen upside down (yes I have seen it happening) and, secondly, the angle of the mirror being out of adjustment (reflecting angle).
The second reason is rather common with the 500C and the 500CM (it happend to mine), but I never heard of it happening to a 503 body which has the 'gliding mirror system', but you never know.
All Hasselblad V accessoires are made to fit flawlessly any of the V system cameras, even in conjunction with a digital back like the CFV 50c which is particularly dedicated to that system.
Why, coming from Hasselblad, would it be otherwise?
I guess that something else than a focussing screen issue is going on here, does it occurs with other lenses?
Nothing wrong with trying something else. I can't shoot with one camera for long as it gets boring too quickly. But we are all different.
It is possible that the body is out of alignment. Could happen if the body has been dropped or knocked some time in the past. Hasselblad made an alignment jig that most Hasselblad service people would have and it is a simple task to get the body back in alignment. There should be no reason to file the screen to achieve focus. I know because my 500c/m had a similar focus problem a few years ago and the local Hasselblad service agent realigned the body and all was well.
I had a similar issue with an entirely different camera (Minolta XD-7). I was able to correct it by shimming the lens mount. Not assymmetrically like you'd expect after damage from being dropped or some such. So my only explanation is that there must have been shims from the factory that were lost in some previous repair.
In your case, as you couldn't reach infinity, it sounds like the lens would need to come closer to the body though. Maybe there are shims there that shouldn't be there? Or the lens is out of spec, but I'd expect a repair person to check that right after the orientation of the focusing screen.
In any case, do your film tests, also to see if the focus scale and infinity stop on the lens are close enough, and test with another lens or ask the repairan if he did! And be happy if everything works out.
I suggest you send the camera to Hasselblad in Sweden.
That is closer to you than David Odess in US (whom you mentioned) and would be the gold standard for repair work on Hasselblad.
I'm in the US but had to have a Hassy lens sent to Hasselblad Sweden because there were no technicians at Hasselblad USA who could work on it.
Yes if they are willing to take it I'll send it to them, but I'm not sure they are. We'll see what they say!
I've also contacted Kamerastore in Finland to inquire wether or not they'll take it on. They are pretty advanced and tackles stuff like this all the time, but they might not want to take on something aren't gonna fix up and sell in the store.
The 503cx does not have the GMS, it has a slightly modified version of the cm mirrors, and use foam pads to locate the mirror. It is prone to the same issue as the C/CM, but as they are younger, the foam pads are usually not as old and deteriorated. Most people versed with servicing a Hasselblad should know to check the mirror pads if it is front focusing.... rather common with the 500C and the 500CM (it happened to mine), but I never heard of it happening to a 503 body which has the 'gliding mirror system', but you never know....
I don't know why Hasselblad in Sweden wouldn't accept your camera for repair.
Let us know what they say. Good luck.
I've never had to file the body to get alignment, something else is probably off.
The 503cx does not have the GMS, it has a slightly modified version of the cm mirrors, and use foam pads to locate the mirror. It is prone to the same issue as the C/CM, but as they are younger, the foam pads are usually not as old and deteriorated. Most people versed with servicing a Hasselblad should know to check the mirror pads if it is front focusing.
Only the 503CW & CWD had the GSM.
The good news is that you can always shim the focus screen back up to where it should be once the actual fault is determined and fixed.
Ah, I wasn't sure if they still serviced V series cameras, but if they do that's that might be the best option. Thanks for the well wishes!
Are you sure it is the screen? Which viewfinder are you using and have you tried more than one lens? They made different diopter eyepieces and it's possible that the one on the viewfinder is not compatible with your vision also if the lens had been dropped rather than the camera an element may be off slightly. It seems that all of the "pieces" should be checked separately on a well functioning camera to eliminate which is off before an invasive repair is tried.
They do. Hasselblad USA told me they would send my 201F there if it needed repair. (Just fyi, 200 and 500 series both V series cameras.)
I think this is a component issue and not a case of 'send it for a service', it should be possible to determine the cause from what you had and what you got. And look where a camera tech got you, sanding down metal!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?