Hasselblad CFE 250mm F/5.6 SuperAchromat shake

Couples

A
Couples

  • 1
  • 0
  • 47
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 3
  • 1
  • 79
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 2
  • 102
Wren

D
Wren

  • 2
  • 0
  • 58

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,040
Messages
2,785,223
Members
99,789
Latest member
Veyen
Recent bookmarks
0

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,391
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I do not have the 250mm SuperAchromat, just the regular 250mm lens and I do not have the lens shaking and I shot it hand held. Your lens may need a CLA.
 

btaylor

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
2,256
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Large Format
There is no mount built into the lensdoes anyone who owns the lens have issues with camera shake with longer exposures

I don’t know if I understand this question, but in general tripod mounts built into physically long lenses are for balance when mounted on a tripod. The 250mm Hasselblad lens is not all that long or heavy, so the engineers who designed it must have felt a tripod mount on the lens was unnecessary. Besides, is this not a leaf shuttered lens? Leaf shutters are inherently low vibration. But long exposures may benefit from mirror lock up prior to exposure.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,391
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
I don’t know if I understand this question, but in general tripod mounts built into physically long lenses are for balance when mounted on a tripod. The 250mm Hasselblad lens is not all that long or heavy, so the engineers who designed it must have felt a tripod mount on the lens was unnecessary. Besides, is this not a leaf shuttered lens? Leaf shutters are inherently low vibration. But long exposures may benefit from mirror lock up prior to exposure.

The 250mm lens is easily used without a tripod. The 500mm lens must be used on a tripod or set on a firm location. It cannot be hand held. I have not handled the 350mm lens so I have not opinion on how to handle it, but it does have a tripod mount.
 

Edgy01

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2023
Messages
49
Location
Santa Barbara
Format
Multi Format
I tripod my 503CW with the 250 SA lens. For all the trouble hauling gear into the field why take a chance on shaking? What’s more trouble taking along a nice CF tripod?
 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
1,408
Format
Medium Format
The 250mm lens does not need a separate tripod mount as it is not that heavy. However, if the question was meant as to whether this focal length should be used with a tripod, the answer is yes. I also did shots with a 250mm Sonnar hand held and it is possible, but using a tripod will give more consistent results.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,391
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
The 250mm lens does not need a separate tripod mount as it is not that heavy. However, if the question was meant as to whether this focal length should be used with a tripod, the answer is yes. I also did shots with a 250mm Sonnar hand held and it is possible, but using a tripod will give more consistent results.

The 250mm lens does not need a tripod with film speeds of ISO 400, slow speeds will require a tripod. Since I use ISO 400 films most of the time, I shoot the 250mm hand held.
 

Slixtiesix

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
1,408
Format
Medium Format
Yes, as I said, it is possible. Fast film speed certainly helps.
 

GLS

Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2018
Messages
1,726
Location
England
Format
Multi Format
There is no mount built into the lensdoes anyone who owns the lens have issues with camera shake with longer exposures

The lack of a tripod foot is not an issue. I've shot my 250 SA at 1/2 of a second without a trace of shake in the image. Just be sure to have a sturdy tripod/head combo and use mirror lock up + cable release.

The lens really demands use of a tripod to achieve its potential.
 

pkupcik

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2022
Messages
18
Location
Atlanta, GA
Format
Medium Format
I have mostly used Gitzo 3 series systemic tripod with 250SA without problems; one time on a travel trip I used Gitzo 1 series small travel tripod and ended up with a lot of frames with obvious camera shake, especially when combined with 2x Mutar, but also without it. To this day I don't know if it was the 1 series tripod or the environment (city streets with heavy car traffic around) or the combination. I told myself to run some controlled tests and just haven't gotten around to it yet.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom