Scotthenrylabonte
Member
There is no mount built into the lensdoes anyone who owns the lens have issues with camera shake with longer exposures
Do you have any sample pics?
Of what, photographs without lens movement. I have literly thousands of them. What would that show you that you have not already seen?
There is no mount built into the lensdoes anyone who owns the lens have issues with camera shake with longer exposures
I don’t know if I understand this question, but in general tripod mounts built into physically long lenses are for balance when mounted on a tripod. The 250mm Hasselblad lens is not all that long or heavy, so the engineers who designed it must have felt a tripod mount on the lens was unnecessary. Besides, is this not a leaf shuttered lens? Leaf shutters are inherently low vibration. But long exposures may benefit from mirror lock up prior to exposure.
The 250mm lens does not need a separate tripod mount as it is not that heavy. However, if the question was meant as to whether this focal length should be used with a tripod, the answer is yes. I also did shots with a 250mm Sonnar hand held and it is possible, but using a tripod will give more consistent results.
There is no mount built into the lensdoes anyone who owns the lens have issues with camera shake with longer exposures
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |