I do not have the 250mm SuperAchromat, just the regular 250mm lens and I do not have the lens shaking and I shot it hand held. Your lens may need a CLA.
I don’t know if I understand this question, but in general tripod mounts built into physically long lenses are for balance when mounted on a tripod. The 250mm Hasselblad lens is not all that long or heavy, so the engineers who designed it must have felt a tripod mount on the lens was unnecessary. Besides, is this not a leaf shuttered lens? Leaf shutters are inherently low vibration. But long exposures may benefit from mirror lock up prior to exposure.
I don’t know if I understand this question, but in general tripod mounts built into physically long lenses are for balance when mounted on a tripod. The 250mm Hasselblad lens is not all that long or heavy, so the engineers who designed it must have felt a tripod mount on the lens was unnecessary. Besides, is this not a leaf shuttered lens? Leaf shutters are inherently low vibration. But long exposures may benefit from mirror lock up prior to exposure.
The 250mm lens is easily used without a tripod. The 500mm lens must be used on a tripod or set on a firm location. It cannot be hand held. I have not handled the 350mm lens so I have not opinion on how to handle it, but it does have a tripod mount.
I tripod my 503CW with the 250 SA lens. For all the trouble hauling gear into the field why take a chance on shaking? What’s more trouble taking along a nice CF tripod?
The 250mm lens does not need a separate tripod mount as it is not that heavy. However, if the question was meant as to whether this focal length should be used with a tripod, the answer is yes. I also did shots with a 250mm Sonnar hand held and it is possible, but using a tripod will give more consistent results.
The 250mm lens does not need a separate tripod mount as it is not that heavy. However, if the question was meant as to whether this focal length should be used with a tripod, the answer is yes. I also did shots with a 250mm Sonnar hand held and it is possible, but using a tripod will give more consistent results.
The 250mm lens does not need a tripod with film speeds of ISO 400, slow speeds will require a tripod. Since I use ISO 400 films most of the time, I shoot the 250mm hand held.
The lack of a tripod foot is not an issue. I've shot my 250 SA at 1/2 of a second without a trace of shake in the image. Just be sure to have a sturdy tripod/head combo and use mirror lock up + cable release.
The lens really demands use of a tripod to achieve its potential.
I have mostly used Gitzo 3 series systemic tripod with 250SA without problems; one time on a travel trip I used Gitzo 1 series small travel tripod and ended up with a lot of frames with obvious camera shake, especially when combined with 2x Mutar, but also without it. To this day I don't know if it was the 1 series tripod or the environment (city streets with heavy car traffic around) or the combination. I told myself to run some controlled tests and just haven't gotten around to it yet.