I researched the 70mm film system for Hasselblad a while back.
1) No one has made the film with the necessary and proper perforations for years.
2) Assuming that you could find the unexposed stock film, getting someone to make the perforations at a price you can afford is less than impossible.
3) Finding someone to process the long film rolls is a life long search without success.
4) Finding the tanks to process the long film rolls is probably extremely difficult at best.
Other than those problems, it will be clear sailing.
Steve
Have you looked into using a Camerz long roll camera? Camerz has two versions, one with 46 mm films and the other with 70 mm. I tried the 70 mm one once and it produced excellent images. It will give the negative of the size of 645. But you can shoot hundreds of shots on every 100 ft roll. There are a few places to process long roll films. Just search the internet. I still have a few partially used rolls in the freezer now. I had to cut the film at a few foot each to process in my own darkroom. I did that only for testing the camera. It worked really well. I am planing to adapt a 645 film magazine on it in order to shoot 120 or 220 films with the camera. It can be done but takes time. Camerz long roll cameras are dirt cheap now. Can be had from eBay for less than $100 shipping included. The 75 - 150 zoom lens on it is an amazing piece of optic. The Camerz camera with the adaption of a 645 magazine will make an excellent studio portraiture camera.
Kodak still makes 70mm aerial films. Check out their webpage for more info:
http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/Aeria...maging_Products_and_Services/Aerial_Films.htm
These guys, HAS Images, will process 70mm film (or they used to):
http://www.hasimages.com/
Jim B.
When I inquired, I was told that the perforations were on the ones needed for the Hasselblad. If you have found otherwise, please let me know.
Steve
Sorry to revive an older thread, but I have a couple questions for Kav. What time interval are you going to use, and just exactly how unattended does the camera need to be? I was thinking that a Hasselblad A32 back might work for you - certainly you can still get some color films in 220-size and getting them processed should not be a problem. You'll only get 32 shots instead of 100, but that's still a fairly large number of shots in one magazine. If your situation would let you reload periodically, might this work?
The interval would depend on how many shots I can take with out reloading, I have a back for 120 & 220 film. I will look into the A32 back. Otherwise I will just use what I have on hand. I would only be able to shoot one roll of film a day for this project. Thanks for the info!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?