I noted the warning about today's prices because whenever someone poses a question like this about almost any premium camera, a bunch of characters chime in with "It is too expensive because I paid $20 in 2005 for this item." No one cares; it is irrelevant today. That is useless data.Welcome to 2021 where $1,800 is a BARGAIN! I have been watching Hasselblad equipment and patiently building my kit for over a year. Kodachromeguy is right, paying attention to focusing screen helps, but $1,800 is a great price regardless of what screen it has. BTW, there are two generations of AcuteMatte screens, and the latest generation (D) had 3 types (crosshair, grid+split, split+microprisms).
As far as I know, the 501cm came with type-D from a factory and that's what it should have unless the owner swaps for a cheaper screen before selling.
P.S. I paid $2,400 for a similar 501cm kit about a year ago, but with a 100mm CF lens and the most popular/expensive split+prism type-D screen.
ABSOLUTELYThe dollar is dead. Long live the $1000 dollar.
Ten years ago, I purchased a 500C and spent twice the initial cost having it fixed up. In the end it was a beauty, but it just became one of those moments were the process (a year + $1200) kind of killed the joy. I ended up selling it - and bought a Leica MP - so no regrets there. But I have always missed that "thing" that the Hasselblad had.
First of all: I want a "recent" camera/lens combo. If someone flew by with a 503CW that would be perfect, but in the meantime I guess I have to deal with the real world.
Secondly, none of the cameras/lenses sold locally (nationally) seems to have been serviced at all. Every single one seems to involve ten years or more on a shelf.
I have been offered a Hasselblad 501CM, and need some parental guidance from people like you. It comes with an 80mm CFE and one A12 back. Exterior seems to be very clean. Original owner, but it hasn't been used for the last five-seven years or so. No boxes.
The price is $1800.
Gut feeling is to turn it down, and keep looking. But that is based on my experience with a 500C + 80mm (much older). So, people with experience, what would you do? Would you be worried buying Hasselblad gear that is 20 years old and which haven't been used for the last seven years?
go to the arax website and get a 88cm/mlu, you won't be sorryUpdate: I declined. I've asked about serial numbers and acute matte, but no straight answers. It did not help that the price was increased to $2300 (for no obvious reason). In the end, for me, this was not it. Prices are what they are. My budget is around $2500 for a kit, but as the saying goes: Buy the seller.
Thank you all for sharing your opinions and knowledge, deeply appreciated.
And unlike a Hasselblad, if it locks up usually a good whack will get it going*go to the arax website and get a 88cm/mlu, you won't be sorry
you can use European glass, and even get a 6,000$ distigon for $150 to use with it...
and out of your 2000$ you have to spend, you will have like $1000 left over to buy bricks of film!
good luck!
John
And unlike a Hasselblad, if it locks up usually a good whack will get it going*
*First 36 rolls or 36 hours, whichever comes first.
Indeed, these are no good signs. Declining was the correct thing to do I guess.Update: I declined. I've asked about serial numbers and acute matte, but no straight answers. It did not help that the price was increased to $2300 (for no obvious reason). In the end, for me, this was not it. Prices are what they are. My budget is around $2500 for a kit, but as the saying goes: Buy the seller.
Thank you all for sharing your opinions and knowledge, deeply appreciated.
Update: I declined. I've asked about serial numbers and acute matte, but no straight answers. It did not help that the price was increased to $2300 (for no obvious reason). In the end, for me, this was not it. Prices are what they are. My budget is around $2500 for a kit, but as the saying goes: Buy the seller.
Thank you all for sharing your opinions and knowledge, deeply appreciated.
Ten years ago, I purchased a 500C and spent twice the initial cost having it fixed up. In the end it was a beauty, but it just became one of those moments were the process (a year + $1200) kind of killed the joy. I ended up selling it - and bought a Leica MP - so no regrets there. But I have always missed that "thing" that the Hasselblad had.
First of all: I want a "recent" camera/lens combo. If someone flew by with a 503CW that would be perfect, but in the meantime I guess I have to deal with the real world.
Secondly, none of the cameras/lenses sold locally (nationally) seems to have been serviced at all. Every single one seems to involve ten years or more on a shelf.
I have been offered a Hasselblad 501CM, and need some parental guidance from people like you. It comes with an 80mm CFE and one A12 back. Exterior seems to be very clean. Original owner, but it hasn't been used for the last five-seven years or so. No boxes.
The price is $1800.
Gut feeling is to turn it down, and keep looking. But that is based on my experience with a 500C + 80mm (much older). So, people with experience, what would you do? Would you be worried buying Hasselblad gear that is 20 years old and which haven't been used for the last seven years?
Well, that is a new experience for me. When I am out using my Hasselblad (or Fuji GW690 or any other camera), almost no-one in the general public has any idea whatsoever about the hardware I am using. Two exceptions: two gents in Poland commented on my Rolleiflex. A gent in Havana complemented me on my Leica M2.Then... when out seeking a 'something' to record to film, you will not be bombarded with the usual "Oh.. is that that a Hasselblad?"
The next time or the time after will be the right one for you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?