It is true - any time left handed me tried to use a Hasselblad, it was the sort of torture only the really dedicated and pure would ever endure!
On a 35mm SLR/MILC, you hold and trigger the shutter with your right hand, and focus with your left hand.
On a Hasselblad, you hold and trigger the shutter with your left hand, and focus with your right hand.
Which one is left handed, and which one is right handed?
@Melvin J Bramley I won't talk you out of it. Getting a Hasselblad is the end of your GAS journey. There's nothing after. A Hasselblad is the final destination. You now have everything. From now on you only have your skill and bad luck to blame for not becoming rich and famous.
Getting a Hasselblad is the end of your GAS journey. There's nothing after. A Hasselblad is the final destination. You now have everything.
my Hasselblad and a 4x5.
Yes and in between is the Mamiya 7 which also delivers images that can hardly be distinguished from the other two.
Phew! Someone gets it
I have both 500C and 500C/M. For me Hasselblad is the perfect system: compact, modular, reliable, beautiful glasses, easy to service.
You can't go wrong with 500C
Buy a Right handed hand grip, with a cable release and suddenly, your World makes sense again!
I have the opportunity to purchase a Hasselblad 500C and lenses at a reasonable price.
My current SLR MF is a Mamiya 645 pro, which is nice but I prefer the square format.
Talk me into it or out of it!
Pro's and cons.
Size weight portability metering etc!!
It won't be available long at the advertised price.
TB
I'm unable to use one of those - for the same reason I am unable to adjust aperture or shutter speed with my right hand.
With most cameras, I can use a winding crank with my right hand.
Melvin, did you buy it? Inquiring minds want to know.
I have both 500C and 500C/M. For me Hasselblad is the perfect system: compact, modular, reliable, beatiful glasses, easy to service.
You can't go wrong with 500C
I love my 500 C/M, beautiful camera, great lenses. I guess it's all relative, but I don't think I'd ever use the word 'compact' to describe it. It's a pretty meaty camera with a lens installed. I did a 5 hour, hilly hike with it a few years back and I still don't think I've replenished all of the fluids I lost that day
I love my 500 C/M, beautiful camera, great lenses. I guess it's all relative, but I don't think I'd ever use the word 'compact' to describe it. It's a pretty meaty camera with a lens installed. I did a 5 hour, hilly hike with it a few years back and I still don't think I've replenished all of the fluids I lost that day
I have the opportunity to purchase a Hasselblad 500C and lenses at a reasonable price.
My current SLR MF is a Mamiya 645 pro, which is nice but I prefer the square format.
Talk me into it or out of it!
Pro's and cons.
Size weight portability metering etc!!
It won't be available long at the advertised price.
TB
There isn’t enough info to answer. If the lenses are Compur shutter, parts have gotten very scarce, and also in that case the price (you mentioned further down) seems high.
I also do not like the early focus screens which were dark and made focusing a challenge u less the scene is very bright.
These are great cameras overall, fitting well in one hand, and a pleasure to use.
Having said that, personally if I were shopping it I would stick with CF or newer lenses (which are Prontor shutters), and I would get a body with interchangeable screens, ideally one that already has an Acute Matte D screen installed. They are the brightest and if you have to find one to add, they run $400-$500USD!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?