- Joined
- Aug 24, 2010
- Messages
- 187
- Format
- Multi Format
The 150mm and 180mm lenses are definitely not the same.
The diagonal angle of view is 29 degrees for the 150mm vs 24 degrees for the 180mm.
I have both lenses. The difference is noticeable.
The lenses have the same base speed, and the aperture range is the same.
These comparisons are from the CF datasheets. I believe the C specs are the same.
- Leigh
IMHO, the 180 is too close to your 150 to own both.
- Buy the 180, then sell the 150, or
- Don't buy the 180.
The 180 was significantly more $$$ than the 150, which is why despite wanting the 180, I went with the 150.
It is also heavier than the 150, if that makes a difference.
Compare the close focus distance and minimum field of view between the 150mm and 180mm options. If the 180mm offers an advantage, consider acquiring it.
By the way, APUG is not the place to go if you want to be convinced not to buy something.
I've never used the 180mm but i've had the 250 for a long time and it's a great lens. I also had the chance to get a 350mm a while back. It's a bit of a bear to lug around and it makes me a little nervous hanging off the end of the camera - but it's a great one too.
(i don't know if my bringing up the 350 is helping you out any though)
I have the exact same four lenses you do, plus a 250mm C. Having the 150mm, I don't see any compelling reason for a 180mm (other than collecting, which is fine).
Conceivably, there could be those few shots where the little bit of extra reach and shallower DOF of the 180mm is perfect. Maybe for (tight) portraits.
The one lens we're both missing is the wonderful 100mm.
Do not buy a 180. It will ruin your life. Buy a 250 instead!
Hi Logan,Thanks for this response! What situations do you find yourself going for the 180 vs. the 150 and vice versa?
What situations do you most often find yourself picking up the 250? I'd be very interested given that we have the same lenses aside from that one.
I did buy the 180 even after already having the 150 for portraits.It's well worth it; it puts that comfortable extra distance between you and the subject and is pinsharp;alsogreat for fashion and product photography.Then I did get the 250 later but it is used the least.Hi all,
I just recently got back into the Hasselblad system after a few years of shooting 8x10. I've put together a really nice little kit of a 503cx and a 553elx with the following lenses:
I also have the 8, 16, 21 extension tubes. I'm using the camera almost exclusively on a tripod and for portraiture. Even though the kit has been really great for covering a lot of situations thus far, I've seen a 180mm Sonnar that I think I can grab at a really good price and I'm debating getting it. Either that or maybe a 250mm.
- 50mm FLE
- 80mm CF
- 120mm Makro CF
- 150mm Sonnar CF
Given what I'm using the camera for, does anyone have some personal experience to add as to whether adding a 180mm lens is foolhardy or just kind of a good idea? I'd love to hear what anyone here has to say!
Thanks!
180 CF which will also eventually be replaced with a CFi.
Same here. All my lenses are CF except for the 350mm, which is a C IIRC.I decided that for me the sweet spot in features, handling & price were CF lenses.
I did buy the 180 even after already having the 150 for portraits.It's well worth it; it puts that comfortable extra distance between you and the subject and is pinsharp;alsogreat for fashion and product photography.Then I did get the 250 later but it is used the least.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?