My first "proper" camera was an ME-Super when I was in sixth-form ('82 ish ?) - still got it - still working - still beautiful !
When you think of Pentax from the film era, what are the first things that come to mind?
For me I will say completely overlooked. 30 years is a long time, but nothing that Pentax did 30 years ago got onto the shortlist of cameras to replace the Praktica BC1 that I had. The shortlist came down to an Olympus OM2 SP, a Canon T90 & a Nikon FA. The Nikon won by a long way.
When you think of Pentax from the film era, what are the first things that come to mind? .
In short, my perception of Pentax is they never again reached the mass public identity or confidence after the Spotmatics, but fell between Nikon's build quality, Olympus's coolness and Canon's innovation. Minolta were never a big player in the UK. If I were buying a Pentax in 2015 I'd opt for a nice old black Spotmatic for looks and a K2 if I was using it as my regular camera, but would probably buy something else first.
The FA? One of the ugliest Nikon cameras? And one with particularly sensitive electronics?! No way!!
When I bought the FA back in 86 the fragility wasn't widely known. Touch wood mine hasn't given me any problems apart from needing a refoam. It still shoots as nice as day 1. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder & what put me off of the techno marvel that was the T90 was the way it looked. Just struck me as so ugly that I couldn't see it around my neck. A couple of years ago out of curiosity I picked up an OM2 SP to give it a try. Felt a brief urge to try a T90 but all I read about the ERR error & needing to bang it on the floor as a temp fix put me off. Just saying that Canon's of the same era aren't 100% reliable either
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?