Answering part of my own question using this source: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5614854/Can anyone explain in layman's terms what the hardening process is in this case, and what factors may likely improve overall efficiency?
The problem here of course is that they're not discussing gelatin as such, but methacryloylated gelatin. In this case, it's not really the gelatin that does the hardening - it's really the MA functional group added to it. The idea of GelMA is to use gelatin for its biocompatibility (i.e. it works nicely in the human body), but to add a group to it that modifies its crosslinking behavior so non-toxic agents can be used. If gelatin would crosslink particularly well without those groups, I'm sure they would use it that way.Visible light excites Eosin Y from the ground state into a triplet state. This then extracts hydrogen atoms from amine-functionalized co-initiators, such as TEA. The deprotonated TEA radical then initiates the formation of a radical center on the methacryloyl groups of GelMA.
I've now found the original message by 'Jim' (James?) that gives a ballpark for the amounts he uses:Currently I'm using a 1:1 ratio of gelatin:TEA, and if I reduce the TEA by even 50%, the whole thing breaks down. I can't imagine it should take this much TEA to get the job done.
(the groups.io thing is an absolute nightmare to navigate, especially the archived threads...)It looks like a gram of dye will make 100 milliliters of sensitizer solution, and about 5 milliliters are needed for sensitising 100 milliliters of gelatin solution along with 20 milliliters of triethanolamine 1% solution, so a little goes a long way.
(w/w or v/w to dry gelatin) | My random guess | Jim's 2016 ratios |
Eosin 1% | 0.2% | 0.5% |
TEA | 100% | 2% |
OK, that actually talks about gelatin and mentions specific amounts - yay!20% gelatin with 0.0289 mM Eosin Y and 90 mM TEOA
For what its worth, I read that this particular system works best with green light where as if you switch to riboflavin as the photoinitiator then it will work with UVA and blue light best.
I've been following your progress with half an eye; not every detail, but I like to skim through your posts and see where you're going. Good stuff!I've been busy looking at PVA + sodium benzoate + ferric ammonium oxalate.
Depends; you're aware of Calvin Grier's work. I think that demonstrates it's possible. But that's all with a halftone screen approach. Not continuous tone. Continuous tone is inherently problematic with the pigment processes. There's really no good way around that. You can sort of optimize within a certain process window, but the problem of 'tonal threshold' (Calvin's term) will always be there. But under certain conditions you can push that threshold down far enough to make an image work.What I've noticed so far though is that gum will always have this inferior resolution compared to gelatine because you loose the highlights when developing.
Well, probably with GelMA, but I've not tried that. I've no idea if it'll work with PVA as I've not tried that, either. I'd be most interested to see if you managed to get some results that way!o riboflavin+TEOA seems to might do the job?
What is missing is the monomer:
PVA + riboflavin + amine + acrylate
expensive and so far not really rewarding.... Except I have no cancer yet.
Quite right. I guess the whole thing is related to what is known as "dye-sensitized photopolymerization". You may look for the groundbreaking work done by the Osters (Gerald and Gisela Oster).
Thanks for the reference. You seem to be aware of this field; if I may ask, are you familiar with any combinations that involve dyes as photon capture 'devices' and gelatin as the polymerization agent?
Thanks for the reference. You seem to be aware of this field; if I may ask, are you familiar with any combinations that involve dyes as photon capture 'devices' and gelatin as the polymerization agent?
With this kind of photopolymers it becomes difficult to produce a surface relief. Getting those chemicals may become a challenge. Moreover, after the light exposure you are ending up with a transparent layer.My god... https://patents.google.com/patent/DE102004030019A1/en
Could these inventors discombobulate my brains after reading thru?
US 3097096 might also be worth reading-This one is peaking my interest: US3097097A 1959-02-12 1963-07-09 Gisela K Oster Photo degrading of gel systems and photographic production of reliefs therewith
Instead you may look for one of the easily available photopolymers used for 3d printing.
You mean the kind used for "resin" printing? I like that idea. In a similar vein - how about the initiator/polymer systems used for UV curing inkjet ink? I've not looked into the chemistry of those, but availability of the materials sould be pretty good provided we can somehow tap into the industrial supply chain. There may be environmental issues though...
I've not looked into that yet; it's on my to-do list, but admittedly it's pretty far down.Thanks very much for pointing to the UV cured inkjet inks. I had completely forgotten about them. Is there a way for the non-professional user to obtain them?
Yes, definitely UV; 365nm is popular right now. I think a major benefit is also that this means the ink can be handled fairly well under artificial light without too much issue. I found the eosin approach quite interesting but also quickly realized it's kind of a b*tch to work with a sensitizer that's sensitive to visible light!From what I gathered the overwhelming majority of these materials are sensitized to UV-A radiation.
Electrical efficiency and cost play a role, too. Quantum efficiency of LEDs isn't too great at smaller wavelengths - which is often offset by the significantly higher sensitivity of initiators to such wavelengths, so sometimes/often it balances it when it comes to 'hardening power per dollar'. Still, LEDs are about 80% cheaper or so at around 400nm than around 360nm, so there's something to be said to make a photo initiator with a peak sensitivity around 400nm.there is a trend toward 405nm and slightly above. I guess this is largely due to safety reasons.
I've been playing around with this recipe this past week. I'm using PVA and CMC for now. I was able to get an image using clear-ish 3D printing resin as the monomer. The process needs a lot of work but its definitely possible. https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/spp-saidanes-print-process.213939/post-2906650
It surely does, at least for the recording of holograms. When I started the thing (www.holographyforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7636) I was amazed to make holograms that looked exactly like dichromated gelatin holograms (DCG).I think it should work just fine for gelatin.
This is very interesting!
It surely does, at least for the recording of holograms. When I started the thing (www.holographyforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7636) I was amazed to make holograms that looked exactly like dichromated gelatin holograms (DCG).
I meanwhile developed it a bit further. Adding a monomer (methylene bisacrylamide) turned it into a nearly high-speed material, not far from AgX. Moreover, it was possible to spectrally sensitize it from 400 - 660nm.
I tried the same activator I used for PVA on a Knox Gelatin sample and it did work. I tried an image but screwed up on the transfer. I exposed for 15 minutes on my visible light projector and obtained something that was over exposed. I made two simple samples and exposed one that was still wet to UV light 365nm for 1 minute. I washed both in cold water and nothing moved. Then I moved to warm water and the unexposed dissolved while the exposed did not. So I think it would work.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?